Validity and Reliability of Agoraphobic Cognitions Questionnaire-Turkish Version

Objective: The aim of this study is to investigate the validity and reliability of Agoraphobic Cognitions Questionnaire -Turkish Version (ACQ). Method: ACQ was administered to 92 patients with agoraphobia or panic disorder with agoraphobia. BSQ Turkish version completed by translation, back-translat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ayþegül KART, M. Hakan TÜRKÇAPAR
Format: Article
Language:Turkish
Published: Association for Cognitive and Behavioral Psychotherapies 2013-12-01
Series:Bilişsel Davranışçı Psikoterapi Araştırmalar Dergisi
Subjects:
Online Access:http://77-1390242633.pdf
id doaj-c13c7da6203b45daa5cc02f4bd3d6ff2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c13c7da6203b45daa5cc02f4bd3d6ff22020-11-25T00:25:30ZturAssociation for Cognitive and Behavioral PsychotherapiesBilişsel Davranışçı Psikoterapi Araştırmalar Dergisi2146-94902013-12-0123162166150657Validity and Reliability of Agoraphobic Cognitions Questionnaire-Turkish VersionAyþegül KARTM. Hakan TÜRKÇAPARObjective: The aim of this study is to investigate the validity and reliability of Agoraphobic Cognitions Questionnaire -Turkish Version (ACQ). Method: ACQ was administered to 92 patients with agoraphobia or panic disorder with agoraphobia. BSQ Turkish version completed by translation, back-translation and pilot assessment. Reliability of ACQ was analyzed by test-retest correlation, split-half technique, Cronbach’s alpha coefficient. Construct validity was evaluated by factor analysis after the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) and Bartlett test had been performed. Principal component analysis and varimax rotation used for factor analysis. Results: 64% of patients evaluated in the study were female and 36% were male. Age interval was between 18 and 58, mean age was 31.5±10.4. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.91. Analysis of test-retest evaluations revealed that there were statistically significant correlations ranging between 24% and 84% concerning questionnaire components. In analysis performed by split-half method reliability coefficients of half questionnaires were found as 0.77 and 0.91. Again Spearmen-Brown coefficient was found as 0.87 by the same analysis. To assess construct validity of ACQ, factor analysis was performed and two basic factors found. These two factors explained 57.6% of the total variance. (Factor 1: 34.6%, Factor 2: 23%) Conclusion: Our findings support that ACQ-Turkish version had a satisfactory level of reliability and validity. [JCBPR 2013; 2(3.000): 162-166]77-1390242633.pdfAgoraphobiacognitionvalidityreliability
collection DOAJ
language Turkish
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ayþegül KART
M. Hakan TÜRKÇAPAR
spellingShingle Ayþegül KART
M. Hakan TÜRKÇAPAR
Validity and Reliability of Agoraphobic Cognitions Questionnaire-Turkish Version
Bilişsel Davranışçı Psikoterapi Araştırmalar Dergisi
Agoraphobia
cognition
validity
reliability
author_facet Ayþegül KART
M. Hakan TÜRKÇAPAR
author_sort Ayþegül KART
title Validity and Reliability of Agoraphobic Cognitions Questionnaire-Turkish Version
title_short Validity and Reliability of Agoraphobic Cognitions Questionnaire-Turkish Version
title_full Validity and Reliability of Agoraphobic Cognitions Questionnaire-Turkish Version
title_fullStr Validity and Reliability of Agoraphobic Cognitions Questionnaire-Turkish Version
title_full_unstemmed Validity and Reliability of Agoraphobic Cognitions Questionnaire-Turkish Version
title_sort validity and reliability of agoraphobic cognitions questionnaire-turkish version
publisher Association for Cognitive and Behavioral Psychotherapies
series Bilişsel Davranışçı Psikoterapi Araştırmalar Dergisi
issn 2146-9490
publishDate 2013-12-01
description Objective: The aim of this study is to investigate the validity and reliability of Agoraphobic Cognitions Questionnaire -Turkish Version (ACQ). Method: ACQ was administered to 92 patients with agoraphobia or panic disorder with agoraphobia. BSQ Turkish version completed by translation, back-translation and pilot assessment. Reliability of ACQ was analyzed by test-retest correlation, split-half technique, Cronbach’s alpha coefficient. Construct validity was evaluated by factor analysis after the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) and Bartlett test had been performed. Principal component analysis and varimax rotation used for factor analysis. Results: 64% of patients evaluated in the study were female and 36% were male. Age interval was between 18 and 58, mean age was 31.5±10.4. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.91. Analysis of test-retest evaluations revealed that there were statistically significant correlations ranging between 24% and 84% concerning questionnaire components. In analysis performed by split-half method reliability coefficients of half questionnaires were found as 0.77 and 0.91. Again Spearmen-Brown coefficient was found as 0.87 by the same analysis. To assess construct validity of ACQ, factor analysis was performed and two basic factors found. These two factors explained 57.6% of the total variance. (Factor 1: 34.6%, Factor 2: 23%) Conclusion: Our findings support that ACQ-Turkish version had a satisfactory level of reliability and validity. [JCBPR 2013; 2(3.000): 162-166]
topic Agoraphobia
cognition
validity
reliability
url http://77-1390242633.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT aythorneguumllkart validityandreliabilityofagoraphobiccognitionsquestionnaireturkishversion
AT mhakantuumlrkccedilapar validityandreliabilityofagoraphobiccognitionsquestionnaireturkishversion
_version_ 1725348631821680640