SWISS MADE: Standardized WithIn Class Sum of Squares to evaluate methodologies and dataset elements.
Contemporary high dimensional biological assays, such as mRNA expression microarrays, regularly involve multiple data processing steps, such as experimental processing, computational processing, sample selection, or feature selection (i.e. gene selection), prior to deriving any biological conclusion...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2010-03-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2845619?pdf=render |
id |
doaj-c1dafb5d3318402ba6e98c786a018ace |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-c1dafb5d3318402ba6e98c786a018ace2020-11-24T22:16:17ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032010-03-0153e990510.1371/journal.pone.0009905SWISS MADE: Standardized WithIn Class Sum of Squares to evaluate methodologies and dataset elements.Christopher R CabanskiYuan QiXiaoying YinEric BairMichele C HaywardCheng FanJianying LiMatthew D WilkersonJ S MarronCharles M PerouD Neil HayesContemporary high dimensional biological assays, such as mRNA expression microarrays, regularly involve multiple data processing steps, such as experimental processing, computational processing, sample selection, or feature selection (i.e. gene selection), prior to deriving any biological conclusions. These steps can dramatically change the interpretation of an experiment. Evaluation of processing steps has received limited attention in the literature. It is not straightforward to evaluate different processing methods and investigators are often unsure of the best method. We present a simple statistical tool, Standardized WithIn class Sum of Squares (SWISS), that allows investigators to compare alternate data processing methods, such as different experimental methods, normalizations, or technologies, on a dataset in terms of how well they cluster a priori biological classes. SWISS uses Euclidean distance to determine which method does a better job of clustering the data elements based on a priori classifications. We apply SWISS to three different gene expression applications. The first application uses four different datasets to compare different experimental methods, normalizations, and gene sets. The second application, using data from the MicroArray Quality Control (MAQC) project, compares different microarray platforms. The third application compares different technologies: a single Agilent two-color microarray versus one lane of RNA-Seq. These applications give an indication of the variety of problems that SWISS can be helpful in solving. The SWISS analysis of one-color versus two-color microarrays provides investigators who use two-color arrays the opportunity to review their results in light of a single-channel analysis, with all of the associated benefits offered by this design. Analysis of the MACQ data shows differential intersite reproducibility by array platform. SWISS also shows that one lane of RNA-Seq clusters data by biological phenotypes as well as a single Agilent two-color microarray.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2845619?pdf=render |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Christopher R Cabanski Yuan Qi Xiaoying Yin Eric Bair Michele C Hayward Cheng Fan Jianying Li Matthew D Wilkerson J S Marron Charles M Perou D Neil Hayes |
spellingShingle |
Christopher R Cabanski Yuan Qi Xiaoying Yin Eric Bair Michele C Hayward Cheng Fan Jianying Li Matthew D Wilkerson J S Marron Charles M Perou D Neil Hayes SWISS MADE: Standardized WithIn Class Sum of Squares to evaluate methodologies and dataset elements. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Christopher R Cabanski Yuan Qi Xiaoying Yin Eric Bair Michele C Hayward Cheng Fan Jianying Li Matthew D Wilkerson J S Marron Charles M Perou D Neil Hayes |
author_sort |
Christopher R Cabanski |
title |
SWISS MADE: Standardized WithIn Class Sum of Squares to evaluate methodologies and dataset elements. |
title_short |
SWISS MADE: Standardized WithIn Class Sum of Squares to evaluate methodologies and dataset elements. |
title_full |
SWISS MADE: Standardized WithIn Class Sum of Squares to evaluate methodologies and dataset elements. |
title_fullStr |
SWISS MADE: Standardized WithIn Class Sum of Squares to evaluate methodologies and dataset elements. |
title_full_unstemmed |
SWISS MADE: Standardized WithIn Class Sum of Squares to evaluate methodologies and dataset elements. |
title_sort |
swiss made: standardized within class sum of squares to evaluate methodologies and dataset elements. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2010-03-01 |
description |
Contemporary high dimensional biological assays, such as mRNA expression microarrays, regularly involve multiple data processing steps, such as experimental processing, computational processing, sample selection, or feature selection (i.e. gene selection), prior to deriving any biological conclusions. These steps can dramatically change the interpretation of an experiment. Evaluation of processing steps has received limited attention in the literature. It is not straightforward to evaluate different processing methods and investigators are often unsure of the best method. We present a simple statistical tool, Standardized WithIn class Sum of Squares (SWISS), that allows investigators to compare alternate data processing methods, such as different experimental methods, normalizations, or technologies, on a dataset in terms of how well they cluster a priori biological classes. SWISS uses Euclidean distance to determine which method does a better job of clustering the data elements based on a priori classifications. We apply SWISS to three different gene expression applications. The first application uses four different datasets to compare different experimental methods, normalizations, and gene sets. The second application, using data from the MicroArray Quality Control (MAQC) project, compares different microarray platforms. The third application compares different technologies: a single Agilent two-color microarray versus one lane of RNA-Seq. These applications give an indication of the variety of problems that SWISS can be helpful in solving. The SWISS analysis of one-color versus two-color microarrays provides investigators who use two-color arrays the opportunity to review their results in light of a single-channel analysis, with all of the associated benefits offered by this design. Analysis of the MACQ data shows differential intersite reproducibility by array platform. SWISS also shows that one lane of RNA-Seq clusters data by biological phenotypes as well as a single Agilent two-color microarray. |
url |
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2845619?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT christopherrcabanski swissmadestandardizedwithinclasssumofsquarestoevaluatemethodologiesanddatasetelements AT yuanqi swissmadestandardizedwithinclasssumofsquarestoevaluatemethodologiesanddatasetelements AT xiaoyingyin swissmadestandardizedwithinclasssumofsquarestoevaluatemethodologiesanddatasetelements AT ericbair swissmadestandardizedwithinclasssumofsquarestoevaluatemethodologiesanddatasetelements AT michelechayward swissmadestandardizedwithinclasssumofsquarestoevaluatemethodologiesanddatasetelements AT chengfan swissmadestandardizedwithinclasssumofsquarestoevaluatemethodologiesanddatasetelements AT jianyingli swissmadestandardizedwithinclasssumofsquarestoevaluatemethodologiesanddatasetelements AT matthewdwilkerson swissmadestandardizedwithinclasssumofsquarestoevaluatemethodologiesanddatasetelements AT jsmarron swissmadestandardizedwithinclasssumofsquarestoevaluatemethodologiesanddatasetelements AT charlesmperou swissmadestandardizedwithinclasssumofsquarestoevaluatemethodologiesanddatasetelements AT dneilhayes swissmadestandardizedwithinclasssumofsquarestoevaluatemethodologiesanddatasetelements |
_version_ |
1725790896565256192 |