Use of DNA-damaging agents and RNA pooling to assess expression profiles associated with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation status in familial breast cancer patients.

A large number of rare sequence variants of unknown clinical significance have been identified in the breast cancer susceptibility genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2. Laboratory-based methods that can distinguish between carriers of pathogenic mutations and non-carriers are likely to have utility for the classi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Logan C Walker, Bryony A Thompson, Nic Waddell, kConFab Investigators, Sean M Grimmond, Amanda B Spurdle
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2010-02-01
Series:PLoS Genetics
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2824809?pdf=render
id doaj-c1e8b2981a1f4722b92fea2cef611d8b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c1e8b2981a1f4722b92fea2cef611d8b2020-11-25T01:04:29ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS Genetics1553-73901553-74042010-02-0162e100085010.1371/journal.pgen.1000850Use of DNA-damaging agents and RNA pooling to assess expression profiles associated with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation status in familial breast cancer patients.Logan C WalkerBryony A ThompsonNic WaddellkConFab InvestigatorsSean M GrimmondAmanda B SpurdleA large number of rare sequence variants of unknown clinical significance have been identified in the breast cancer susceptibility genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2. Laboratory-based methods that can distinguish between carriers of pathogenic mutations and non-carriers are likely to have utility for the classification of these sequence variants. To identify predictors of pathogenic mutation status in familial breast cancer patients, we explored the use of gene expression arrays to assess the effect of two DNA-damaging agents (irradiation and mitomycin C) on cellular response in relation to BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation status. A range of regimes was used to treat 27 lymphoblastoid cell-lines (LCLs) derived from affected women in high-risk breast cancer families (nine BRCA1, nine BRCA2, and nine non-BRCA1/2 or BRCAX individuals) and nine LCLs from healthy individuals. Using an RNA-pooling strategy, we found that treating LCLs with 1.2 microM mitomycin C and measuring the gene expression profiles 1 hour post-treatment had the greatest potential to discriminate BRCA1, BRCA2, and BRCAX mutation status. A classifier was built using the expression profile of nine QRT-PCR validated genes that were associated with BRCA1, BRCA2, and BRCAX status in RNA pools. These nine genes could distinguish BRCA1 from BRCA2 carriers with 83% accuracy in individual samples, but three-way analysis for BRCA1, BRCA2, and BRCAX had a maximum of 59% prediction accuracy. Our results suggest that, compared to BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers, non-BRCA1/2 (BRCAX) individuals are genetically heterogeneous. This study also demonstrates the effectiveness of RNA pools to compare the expression profiles of cell-lines from BRCA1, BRCA2, and BRCAX cases after treatment with irradiation and mitomycin C as a method to prioritize treatment regimes for detailed downstream expression analysis.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2824809?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Logan C Walker
Bryony A Thompson
Nic Waddell
kConFab Investigators
Sean M Grimmond
Amanda B Spurdle
spellingShingle Logan C Walker
Bryony A Thompson
Nic Waddell
kConFab Investigators
Sean M Grimmond
Amanda B Spurdle
Use of DNA-damaging agents and RNA pooling to assess expression profiles associated with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation status in familial breast cancer patients.
PLoS Genetics
author_facet Logan C Walker
Bryony A Thompson
Nic Waddell
kConFab Investigators
Sean M Grimmond
Amanda B Spurdle
author_sort Logan C Walker
title Use of DNA-damaging agents and RNA pooling to assess expression profiles associated with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation status in familial breast cancer patients.
title_short Use of DNA-damaging agents and RNA pooling to assess expression profiles associated with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation status in familial breast cancer patients.
title_full Use of DNA-damaging agents and RNA pooling to assess expression profiles associated with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation status in familial breast cancer patients.
title_fullStr Use of DNA-damaging agents and RNA pooling to assess expression profiles associated with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation status in familial breast cancer patients.
title_full_unstemmed Use of DNA-damaging agents and RNA pooling to assess expression profiles associated with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation status in familial breast cancer patients.
title_sort use of dna-damaging agents and rna pooling to assess expression profiles associated with brca1 and brca2 mutation status in familial breast cancer patients.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS Genetics
issn 1553-7390
1553-7404
publishDate 2010-02-01
description A large number of rare sequence variants of unknown clinical significance have been identified in the breast cancer susceptibility genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2. Laboratory-based methods that can distinguish between carriers of pathogenic mutations and non-carriers are likely to have utility for the classification of these sequence variants. To identify predictors of pathogenic mutation status in familial breast cancer patients, we explored the use of gene expression arrays to assess the effect of two DNA-damaging agents (irradiation and mitomycin C) on cellular response in relation to BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation status. A range of regimes was used to treat 27 lymphoblastoid cell-lines (LCLs) derived from affected women in high-risk breast cancer families (nine BRCA1, nine BRCA2, and nine non-BRCA1/2 or BRCAX individuals) and nine LCLs from healthy individuals. Using an RNA-pooling strategy, we found that treating LCLs with 1.2 microM mitomycin C and measuring the gene expression profiles 1 hour post-treatment had the greatest potential to discriminate BRCA1, BRCA2, and BRCAX mutation status. A classifier was built using the expression profile of nine QRT-PCR validated genes that were associated with BRCA1, BRCA2, and BRCAX status in RNA pools. These nine genes could distinguish BRCA1 from BRCA2 carriers with 83% accuracy in individual samples, but three-way analysis for BRCA1, BRCA2, and BRCAX had a maximum of 59% prediction accuracy. Our results suggest that, compared to BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers, non-BRCA1/2 (BRCAX) individuals are genetically heterogeneous. This study also demonstrates the effectiveness of RNA pools to compare the expression profiles of cell-lines from BRCA1, BRCA2, and BRCAX cases after treatment with irradiation and mitomycin C as a method to prioritize treatment regimes for detailed downstream expression analysis.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2824809?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT logancwalker useofdnadamagingagentsandrnapoolingtoassessexpressionprofilesassociatedwithbrca1andbrca2mutationstatusinfamilialbreastcancerpatients
AT bryonyathompson useofdnadamagingagentsandrnapoolingtoassessexpressionprofilesassociatedwithbrca1andbrca2mutationstatusinfamilialbreastcancerpatients
AT nicwaddell useofdnadamagingagentsandrnapoolingtoassessexpressionprofilesassociatedwithbrca1andbrca2mutationstatusinfamilialbreastcancerpatients
AT kconfabinvestigators useofdnadamagingagentsandrnapoolingtoassessexpressionprofilesassociatedwithbrca1andbrca2mutationstatusinfamilialbreastcancerpatients
AT seanmgrimmond useofdnadamagingagentsandrnapoolingtoassessexpressionprofilesassociatedwithbrca1andbrca2mutationstatusinfamilialbreastcancerpatients
AT amandabspurdle useofdnadamagingagentsandrnapoolingtoassessexpressionprofilesassociatedwithbrca1andbrca2mutationstatusinfamilialbreastcancerpatients
_version_ 1725197757367451648