Verification of the cross immunoreactivity of A60, a mouse monoclonal antibody against neuronal nuclear protein

A60, the mouse monoclonal antibody against the neuronal nuclear protein (NeuN), is the most widely used neuronal marker in neuroscience research and neuropathological assays. Previous studies identified fragments of A60-immunoprecipitated protein as Synapsin I (Syn I), suggesting the antibody will d...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shanping eMao, Guoxiang eXiong, Lei eZhang, Huimin eDong, Baohui eLiu, Noam A Cohen, Akiva eCohen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-05-01
Series:Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnana.2016.00054/full
id doaj-c1f79412db2c449e8686b581a9d09824
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c1f79412db2c449e8686b581a9d098242020-11-24T23:02:46ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neuroanatomy1662-51292016-05-011010.3389/fnana.2016.00054198528Verification of the cross immunoreactivity of A60, a mouse monoclonal antibody against neuronal nuclear proteinShanping eMao0Guoxiang eXiong1Lei eZhang2Huimin eDong3Baohui eLiu4Noam A Cohen5Noam A Cohen6Akiva eCohen7Akiva eCohen8Renmin Hospital, Wuhan UniversityChildren’s Hospital of PhiladelphiaChildren’s Hospital of PhiladelphiaRenmin Hospital, Wuhan UniversityRenmin Hospital, Wuhan UniversityPhiladelphia Veterans Affairs Medical CenterPerelman School of Medicine, University of PennsylvaniaChildren’s Hospital of PhiladelphiaPerelman School of Medicine, University of PennsylvaniaA60, the mouse monoclonal antibody against the neuronal nuclear protein (NeuN), is the most widely used neuronal marker in neuroscience research and neuropathological assays. Previous studies identified fragments of A60-immunoprecipitated protein as Synapsin I (Syn I), suggesting the antibody will demonstrate cross immunoreactivity. However, the likelihood of cross reactivity has never been verified by immunohistochemical techniques. Using our established tissue processing and immunofluorescent staining protocols, we found that A60 consistently labelled mossy fiber terminals in hippocampal area CA3. These A60-positive mossy fiber terminals could also be labelled by Syn I antibody. After treating brain slices with saponin in order to better preserve various membrane and/or vesicular proteins for immunostaining, we observed that A60 could also label additional synapses in various brain areas. Therefore, we used A60 together with a rabbit monoclonal NeuN antibody to confirm the existence of this cross reactivity. We showed that the putative band positive for A60 and Syn I could not be detected by the rabbit anti-NeuN in Western blotting. As efficient as Millipore A60 to recognize neuronal nuclei, the rabbit NeuN antibody demonstrated no labelling of synaptic structures in immunofluorescent staining. The present study successfully verified the cross reactivity present in immunohistochemistry, cautioning that A60 may not be the ideal biomarker to verify neuronal identity due to its cross immunoreactivity. In contrast, the rabbit monoclonal NeuN antibody used in this study may be a better candidate to substitute for A60.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnana.2016.00054/fullEpitopesNeurocytomaimmunohistologystem cell differentiationhybridomabrain sections
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Shanping eMao
Guoxiang eXiong
Lei eZhang
Huimin eDong
Baohui eLiu
Noam A Cohen
Noam A Cohen
Akiva eCohen
Akiva eCohen
spellingShingle Shanping eMao
Guoxiang eXiong
Lei eZhang
Huimin eDong
Baohui eLiu
Noam A Cohen
Noam A Cohen
Akiva eCohen
Akiva eCohen
Verification of the cross immunoreactivity of A60, a mouse monoclonal antibody against neuronal nuclear protein
Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
Epitopes
Neurocytoma
immunohistology
stem cell differentiation
hybridoma
brain sections
author_facet Shanping eMao
Guoxiang eXiong
Lei eZhang
Huimin eDong
Baohui eLiu
Noam A Cohen
Noam A Cohen
Akiva eCohen
Akiva eCohen
author_sort Shanping eMao
title Verification of the cross immunoreactivity of A60, a mouse monoclonal antibody against neuronal nuclear protein
title_short Verification of the cross immunoreactivity of A60, a mouse monoclonal antibody against neuronal nuclear protein
title_full Verification of the cross immunoreactivity of A60, a mouse monoclonal antibody against neuronal nuclear protein
title_fullStr Verification of the cross immunoreactivity of A60, a mouse monoclonal antibody against neuronal nuclear protein
title_full_unstemmed Verification of the cross immunoreactivity of A60, a mouse monoclonal antibody against neuronal nuclear protein
title_sort verification of the cross immunoreactivity of a60, a mouse monoclonal antibody against neuronal nuclear protein
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
issn 1662-5129
publishDate 2016-05-01
description A60, the mouse monoclonal antibody against the neuronal nuclear protein (NeuN), is the most widely used neuronal marker in neuroscience research and neuropathological assays. Previous studies identified fragments of A60-immunoprecipitated protein as Synapsin I (Syn I), suggesting the antibody will demonstrate cross immunoreactivity. However, the likelihood of cross reactivity has never been verified by immunohistochemical techniques. Using our established tissue processing and immunofluorescent staining protocols, we found that A60 consistently labelled mossy fiber terminals in hippocampal area CA3. These A60-positive mossy fiber terminals could also be labelled by Syn I antibody. After treating brain slices with saponin in order to better preserve various membrane and/or vesicular proteins for immunostaining, we observed that A60 could also label additional synapses in various brain areas. Therefore, we used A60 together with a rabbit monoclonal NeuN antibody to confirm the existence of this cross reactivity. We showed that the putative band positive for A60 and Syn I could not be detected by the rabbit anti-NeuN in Western blotting. As efficient as Millipore A60 to recognize neuronal nuclei, the rabbit NeuN antibody demonstrated no labelling of synaptic structures in immunofluorescent staining. The present study successfully verified the cross reactivity present in immunohistochemistry, cautioning that A60 may not be the ideal biomarker to verify neuronal identity due to its cross immunoreactivity. In contrast, the rabbit monoclonal NeuN antibody used in this study may be a better candidate to substitute for A60.
topic Epitopes
Neurocytoma
immunohistology
stem cell differentiation
hybridoma
brain sections
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnana.2016.00054/full
work_keys_str_mv AT shanpingemao verificationofthecrossimmunoreactivityofa60amousemonoclonalantibodyagainstneuronalnuclearprotein
AT guoxiangexiong verificationofthecrossimmunoreactivityofa60amousemonoclonalantibodyagainstneuronalnuclearprotein
AT leiezhang verificationofthecrossimmunoreactivityofa60amousemonoclonalantibodyagainstneuronalnuclearprotein
AT huiminedong verificationofthecrossimmunoreactivityofa60amousemonoclonalantibodyagainstneuronalnuclearprotein
AT baohuieliu verificationofthecrossimmunoreactivityofa60amousemonoclonalantibodyagainstneuronalnuclearprotein
AT noamacohen verificationofthecrossimmunoreactivityofa60amousemonoclonalantibodyagainstneuronalnuclearprotein
AT noamacohen verificationofthecrossimmunoreactivityofa60amousemonoclonalantibodyagainstneuronalnuclearprotein
AT akivaecohen verificationofthecrossimmunoreactivityofa60amousemonoclonalantibodyagainstneuronalnuclearprotein
AT akivaecohen verificationofthecrossimmunoreactivityofa60amousemonoclonalantibodyagainstneuronalnuclearprotein
_version_ 1725635206235291648