Kim są uczestnicy Buberowskiego dialogu? [Who are the participants of Buber’s dialogue?]

This article tries to explain the meaning of „I” and „Thou” as categories essential for Martin Buber’s philosophy of dialogue. I consider these categories in a context of human’s origin and interpersonal existence. Buber’s statement of ‘dialogity’ as a specific quality of human existence has, first...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Witold P. Glinkowski
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego 2014-06-01
Series:Analiza i Egzystencja
Subjects:
Online Access:http://egzystencja.whus.pl/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/26-Glinkowski-Kim-s%C4%85-uczestnicy-Buberowskiego-dialogu.pdf
id doaj-c2361c00802b42b3b6bf91dbc0dd7938
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c2361c00802b42b3b6bf91dbc0dd79382020-11-25T00:46:08ZdeuWydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu SzczecińskiegoAnaliza i Egzystencja 1734-99231734-99232014-06-01264359Kim są uczestnicy Buberowskiego dialogu? [Who are the participants of Buber’s dialogue?]Witold P. Glinkowski0Uniwersytet ŁódzkiThis article tries to explain the meaning of „I” and „Thou” as categories essential for Martin Buber’s philosophy of dialogue. I consider these categories in a context of human’s origin and interpersonal existence. Buber’s statement of ‘dialogity’ as a specific quality of human existence has, first of all, descriptive status, and then – indirectly and secondarily – prescriptive one. I take special notice of a transcendent position of Thou towards I and distance between them. I also take under consideration „nominal” matter of I and Thou, which decides on one’s individuality and their ability to listen and answer. The result of I and Thou meeting is recognizing in I a fellow-man towards Thou. Being I and being Thou can be identified only if they are able to cross immanent cultural sphere. This is because addressing I by Thou had its beginning in transcendentalism of divine Thou and can not be interpreted in immanent context of culture as autonomous cultural area.http://egzystencja.whus.pl/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/26-Glinkowski-Kim-s%C4%85-uczestnicy-Buberowskiego-dialogu.pdfphilosophical anthropologyneighborphilosophy of dialogueMartin Buberdialogical relation
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Witold P. Glinkowski
spellingShingle Witold P. Glinkowski
Kim są uczestnicy Buberowskiego dialogu? [Who are the participants of Buber’s dialogue?]
Analiza i Egzystencja
philosophical anthropology
neighbor
philosophy of dialogue
Martin Buber
dialogical relation
author_facet Witold P. Glinkowski
author_sort Witold P. Glinkowski
title Kim są uczestnicy Buberowskiego dialogu? [Who are the participants of Buber’s dialogue?]
title_short Kim są uczestnicy Buberowskiego dialogu? [Who are the participants of Buber’s dialogue?]
title_full Kim są uczestnicy Buberowskiego dialogu? [Who are the participants of Buber’s dialogue?]
title_fullStr Kim są uczestnicy Buberowskiego dialogu? [Who are the participants of Buber’s dialogue?]
title_full_unstemmed Kim są uczestnicy Buberowskiego dialogu? [Who are the participants of Buber’s dialogue?]
title_sort kim są uczestnicy buberowskiego dialogu? [who are the participants of buber’s dialogue?]
publisher Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego
series Analiza i Egzystencja
issn 1734-9923
1734-9923
publishDate 2014-06-01
description This article tries to explain the meaning of „I” and „Thou” as categories essential for Martin Buber’s philosophy of dialogue. I consider these categories in a context of human’s origin and interpersonal existence. Buber’s statement of ‘dialogity’ as a specific quality of human existence has, first of all, descriptive status, and then – indirectly and secondarily – prescriptive one. I take special notice of a transcendent position of Thou towards I and distance between them. I also take under consideration „nominal” matter of I and Thou, which decides on one’s individuality and their ability to listen and answer. The result of I and Thou meeting is recognizing in I a fellow-man towards Thou. Being I and being Thou can be identified only if they are able to cross immanent cultural sphere. This is because addressing I by Thou had its beginning in transcendentalism of divine Thou and can not be interpreted in immanent context of culture as autonomous cultural area.
topic philosophical anthropology
neighbor
philosophy of dialogue
Martin Buber
dialogical relation
url http://egzystencja.whus.pl/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/26-Glinkowski-Kim-s%C4%85-uczestnicy-Buberowskiego-dialogu.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT witoldpglinkowski kimsauczestnicybuberowskiegodialoguwhoaretheparticipantsofbubersdialogue
_version_ 1725266745150668800