Kim są uczestnicy Buberowskiego dialogu? [Who are the participants of Buber’s dialogue?]
This article tries to explain the meaning of „I” and „Thou” as categories essential for Martin Buber’s philosophy of dialogue. I consider these categories in a context of human’s origin and interpersonal existence. Buber’s statement of ‘dialogity’ as a specific quality of human existence has, first...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego
2014-06-01
|
Series: | Analiza i Egzystencja |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://egzystencja.whus.pl/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/26-Glinkowski-Kim-s%C4%85-uczestnicy-Buberowskiego-dialogu.pdf |
id |
doaj-c2361c00802b42b3b6bf91dbc0dd7938 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-c2361c00802b42b3b6bf91dbc0dd79382020-11-25T00:46:08ZdeuWydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu SzczecińskiegoAnaliza i Egzystencja 1734-99231734-99232014-06-01264359Kim są uczestnicy Buberowskiego dialogu? [Who are the participants of Buber’s dialogue?]Witold P. Glinkowski0Uniwersytet ŁódzkiThis article tries to explain the meaning of „I” and „Thou” as categories essential for Martin Buber’s philosophy of dialogue. I consider these categories in a context of human’s origin and interpersonal existence. Buber’s statement of ‘dialogity’ as a specific quality of human existence has, first of all, descriptive status, and then – indirectly and secondarily – prescriptive one. I take special notice of a transcendent position of Thou towards I and distance between them. I also take under consideration „nominal” matter of I and Thou, which decides on one’s individuality and their ability to listen and answer. The result of I and Thou meeting is recognizing in I a fellow-man towards Thou. Being I and being Thou can be identified only if they are able to cross immanent cultural sphere. This is because addressing I by Thou had its beginning in transcendentalism of divine Thou and can not be interpreted in immanent context of culture as autonomous cultural area.http://egzystencja.whus.pl/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/26-Glinkowski-Kim-s%C4%85-uczestnicy-Buberowskiego-dialogu.pdfphilosophical anthropologyneighborphilosophy of dialogueMartin Buberdialogical relation |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
deu |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Witold P. Glinkowski |
spellingShingle |
Witold P. Glinkowski Kim są uczestnicy Buberowskiego dialogu? [Who are the participants of Buber’s dialogue?] Analiza i Egzystencja philosophical anthropology neighbor philosophy of dialogue Martin Buber dialogical relation |
author_facet |
Witold P. Glinkowski |
author_sort |
Witold P. Glinkowski |
title |
Kim są uczestnicy Buberowskiego dialogu? [Who are the participants of Buber’s dialogue?] |
title_short |
Kim są uczestnicy Buberowskiego dialogu? [Who are the participants of Buber’s dialogue?] |
title_full |
Kim są uczestnicy Buberowskiego dialogu? [Who are the participants of Buber’s dialogue?] |
title_fullStr |
Kim są uczestnicy Buberowskiego dialogu? [Who are the participants of Buber’s dialogue?] |
title_full_unstemmed |
Kim są uczestnicy Buberowskiego dialogu? [Who are the participants of Buber’s dialogue?] |
title_sort |
kim są uczestnicy buberowskiego dialogu? [who are the participants of buber’s dialogue?] |
publisher |
Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego |
series |
Analiza i Egzystencja |
issn |
1734-9923 1734-9923 |
publishDate |
2014-06-01 |
description |
This article tries to explain the meaning of „I” and „Thou” as categories essential for Martin Buber’s philosophy of dialogue. I consider these categories in a context of human’s origin and interpersonal existence. Buber’s statement of ‘dialogity’ as a specific quality of human existence has, first of all, descriptive status, and then – indirectly and secondarily – prescriptive one. I take special notice of a transcendent position of Thou towards I and distance between them. I also take under consideration „nominal” matter of I and Thou, which decides on one’s individuality and their ability to listen and answer. The result of I and Thou meeting is recognizing in I a fellow-man towards Thou. Being I and being Thou can be identified only if they are able to cross immanent cultural sphere. This is because addressing I by Thou had its beginning in transcendentalism of divine Thou and can not be interpreted in immanent context of culture as autonomous cultural area. |
topic |
philosophical anthropology neighbor philosophy of dialogue Martin Buber dialogical relation |
url |
http://egzystencja.whus.pl/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/26-Glinkowski-Kim-s%C4%85-uczestnicy-Buberowskiego-dialogu.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT witoldpglinkowski kimsauczestnicybuberowskiegodialoguwhoaretheparticipantsofbubersdialogue |
_version_ |
1725266745150668800 |