Deep neural network models for identifying incident dementia using claims and EHR datasets.

This study investigates the use of deep learning methods to improve the accuracy of a predictive model for dementia, and compares the performance to a traditional machine learning model. With sufficient accuracy the model can be deployed as a first round screening tool for clinical follow-up includi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vijay S Nori, Christopher A Hane, Yezhou Sun, William H Crown, Paul A Bleicher
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2020-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236400
id doaj-c245df47c0ce43a894f8d1833da21a02
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c245df47c0ce43a894f8d1833da21a022021-03-03T22:03:05ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-01159e023640010.1371/journal.pone.0236400Deep neural network models for identifying incident dementia using claims and EHR datasets.Vijay S NoriChristopher A HaneYezhou SunWilliam H CrownPaul A BleicherThis study investigates the use of deep learning methods to improve the accuracy of a predictive model for dementia, and compares the performance to a traditional machine learning model. With sufficient accuracy the model can be deployed as a first round screening tool for clinical follow-up including neurological examination, neuropsychological testing, imaging and recruitment to clinical trials. Seven cohorts with two years of data, three to eight years prior to index date, and an incident cohort were created. Four trained models for each cohort, boosted trees, feed forward network, recurrent neural network and recurrent neural network with pre-trained weights, were constructed and their performance compared using validation and test data. The incident model had an AUC of 94.4% and F1 score of 54.1%. Eight years removed from index date the AUC and F1 scores were 80.7% and 25.6%, respectively. The results for the remaining cohorts were between these ranges. Deep learning models can result in significant improvement in performance but come at a cost in terms of run times and hardware requirements. The results of the model at index date indicate that this modeling can be effective at stratifying patients at risk of dementia. At this time, the inability to sustain this quality at longer lead times is more an issue of data availability and quality rather than one of algorithm choices.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236400
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Vijay S Nori
Christopher A Hane
Yezhou Sun
William H Crown
Paul A Bleicher
spellingShingle Vijay S Nori
Christopher A Hane
Yezhou Sun
William H Crown
Paul A Bleicher
Deep neural network models for identifying incident dementia using claims and EHR datasets.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Vijay S Nori
Christopher A Hane
Yezhou Sun
William H Crown
Paul A Bleicher
author_sort Vijay S Nori
title Deep neural network models for identifying incident dementia using claims and EHR datasets.
title_short Deep neural network models for identifying incident dementia using claims and EHR datasets.
title_full Deep neural network models for identifying incident dementia using claims and EHR datasets.
title_fullStr Deep neural network models for identifying incident dementia using claims and EHR datasets.
title_full_unstemmed Deep neural network models for identifying incident dementia using claims and EHR datasets.
title_sort deep neural network models for identifying incident dementia using claims and ehr datasets.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2020-01-01
description This study investigates the use of deep learning methods to improve the accuracy of a predictive model for dementia, and compares the performance to a traditional machine learning model. With sufficient accuracy the model can be deployed as a first round screening tool for clinical follow-up including neurological examination, neuropsychological testing, imaging and recruitment to clinical trials. Seven cohorts with two years of data, three to eight years prior to index date, and an incident cohort were created. Four trained models for each cohort, boosted trees, feed forward network, recurrent neural network and recurrent neural network with pre-trained weights, were constructed and their performance compared using validation and test data. The incident model had an AUC of 94.4% and F1 score of 54.1%. Eight years removed from index date the AUC and F1 scores were 80.7% and 25.6%, respectively. The results for the remaining cohorts were between these ranges. Deep learning models can result in significant improvement in performance but come at a cost in terms of run times and hardware requirements. The results of the model at index date indicate that this modeling can be effective at stratifying patients at risk of dementia. At this time, the inability to sustain this quality at longer lead times is more an issue of data availability and quality rather than one of algorithm choices.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236400
work_keys_str_mv AT vijaysnori deepneuralnetworkmodelsforidentifyingincidentdementiausingclaimsandehrdatasets
AT christopherahane deepneuralnetworkmodelsforidentifyingincidentdementiausingclaimsandehrdatasets
AT yezhousun deepneuralnetworkmodelsforidentifyingincidentdementiausingclaimsandehrdatasets
AT williamhcrown deepneuralnetworkmodelsforidentifyingincidentdementiausingclaimsandehrdatasets
AT paulableicher deepneuralnetworkmodelsforidentifyingincidentdementiausingclaimsandehrdatasets
_version_ 1714813705836822528