Exploring women's preferences for birth settings in England: A discrete choice experiment.

<h4>Objective</h4>To explore pregnant women's preferences for birth setting in England.<h4>Design</h4>Labelled discrete choice experiment (DCE).<h4>Setting</h4>Online survey.<h4>Sample</h4>Pregnant women recruited through social media and an onlin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Benjamin Rupert Fletcher, Rachel Rowe, Jennifer Hollowell, Miranda Scanlon, Lisa Hinton, Oliver Rivero-Arias
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2019-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215098
id doaj-c25ea4eebe3d42eca1325a43f0fada4f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c25ea4eebe3d42eca1325a43f0fada4f2021-03-04T10:33:38ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032019-01-01144e021509810.1371/journal.pone.0215098Exploring women's preferences for birth settings in England: A discrete choice experiment.Benjamin Rupert FletcherRachel RoweJennifer HollowellMiranda ScanlonLisa HintonOliver Rivero-Arias<h4>Objective</h4>To explore pregnant women's preferences for birth setting in England.<h4>Design</h4>Labelled discrete choice experiment (DCE).<h4>Setting</h4>Online survey.<h4>Sample</h4>Pregnant women recruited through social media and an online panel.<h4>Methods</h4>We developed a DCE to assess women's preferences for four hypothetical birth settings based on seven attributes: reputation, continuity of care, distance from home, time to see a doctor, partner able to stay overnight, chance of straightforward birth and safety for baby. We used a mixed logit model, with setting modelled as an alternative-specific constant, and conducted a scenario analysis to evaluate the impact of changes in attribute levels on uptake of birth settings.<h4>Main outcome measures</h4>Women's preferences for birth setting.<h4>Results</h4>257 pregnant women completed the DCE. All birth setting attributes, except 'time to see doctor', were significant in women's choice (p<0.05). There was significant heterogeneity in preferences for some attributes. Changes to levels for 'safety for the baby' and 'partner able to stay overnight' were associated with larger changes from baseline uptake of birth setting. If the preferences identified were translated into the real-world context up to a third of those who reported planning birth in an obstetric unit might choose a midwifery unit assuming universal access to all settings, and knowledge of the differences between settings.<h4>Conclusions</h4>We found that 'safety for the baby', 'chance of a straightforward birth' and 'can the woman's partner stay overnight following birth' were particularly important in women's preferences for hypothetical birth setting. If all birth settings were available to women and they were aware of the differences between them, it is likely that more low risk women who currently plan birth in OUs might choose a midwifery unit.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215098
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Benjamin Rupert Fletcher
Rachel Rowe
Jennifer Hollowell
Miranda Scanlon
Lisa Hinton
Oliver Rivero-Arias
spellingShingle Benjamin Rupert Fletcher
Rachel Rowe
Jennifer Hollowell
Miranda Scanlon
Lisa Hinton
Oliver Rivero-Arias
Exploring women's preferences for birth settings in England: A discrete choice experiment.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Benjamin Rupert Fletcher
Rachel Rowe
Jennifer Hollowell
Miranda Scanlon
Lisa Hinton
Oliver Rivero-Arias
author_sort Benjamin Rupert Fletcher
title Exploring women's preferences for birth settings in England: A discrete choice experiment.
title_short Exploring women's preferences for birth settings in England: A discrete choice experiment.
title_full Exploring women's preferences for birth settings in England: A discrete choice experiment.
title_fullStr Exploring women's preferences for birth settings in England: A discrete choice experiment.
title_full_unstemmed Exploring women's preferences for birth settings in England: A discrete choice experiment.
title_sort exploring women's preferences for birth settings in england: a discrete choice experiment.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2019-01-01
description <h4>Objective</h4>To explore pregnant women's preferences for birth setting in England.<h4>Design</h4>Labelled discrete choice experiment (DCE).<h4>Setting</h4>Online survey.<h4>Sample</h4>Pregnant women recruited through social media and an online panel.<h4>Methods</h4>We developed a DCE to assess women's preferences for four hypothetical birth settings based on seven attributes: reputation, continuity of care, distance from home, time to see a doctor, partner able to stay overnight, chance of straightforward birth and safety for baby. We used a mixed logit model, with setting modelled as an alternative-specific constant, and conducted a scenario analysis to evaluate the impact of changes in attribute levels on uptake of birth settings.<h4>Main outcome measures</h4>Women's preferences for birth setting.<h4>Results</h4>257 pregnant women completed the DCE. All birth setting attributes, except 'time to see doctor', were significant in women's choice (p<0.05). There was significant heterogeneity in preferences for some attributes. Changes to levels for 'safety for the baby' and 'partner able to stay overnight' were associated with larger changes from baseline uptake of birth setting. If the preferences identified were translated into the real-world context up to a third of those who reported planning birth in an obstetric unit might choose a midwifery unit assuming universal access to all settings, and knowledge of the differences between settings.<h4>Conclusions</h4>We found that 'safety for the baby', 'chance of a straightforward birth' and 'can the woman's partner stay overnight following birth' were particularly important in women's preferences for hypothetical birth setting. If all birth settings were available to women and they were aware of the differences between them, it is likely that more low risk women who currently plan birth in OUs might choose a midwifery unit.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215098
work_keys_str_mv AT benjaminrupertfletcher exploringwomenspreferencesforbirthsettingsinenglandadiscretechoiceexperiment
AT rachelrowe exploringwomenspreferencesforbirthsettingsinenglandadiscretechoiceexperiment
AT jenniferhollowell exploringwomenspreferencesforbirthsettingsinenglandadiscretechoiceexperiment
AT mirandascanlon exploringwomenspreferencesforbirthsettingsinenglandadiscretechoiceexperiment
AT lisahinton exploringwomenspreferencesforbirthsettingsinenglandadiscretechoiceexperiment
AT oliverriveroarias exploringwomenspreferencesforbirthsettingsinenglandadiscretechoiceexperiment
_version_ 1714805519746596864