Image quality and diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted breast magnetic resonance imaging: Comparison of acquired and computed images.

<h4>Purpose</h4>To compare the image quality of acquired diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and computed DWI and evaluate the lesion detectability and likelihood of malignancy in these datasets.<h4>Materials and methods</h4>This prospective study was approved by our institution...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hye Shin Ahn, Sung Hun Kim, Ji Youn Kim, Chang Suk Park, Robert Grimm, Yohan Son
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247379
id doaj-c274230eaef341259cb29aea30c5afdf
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c274230eaef341259cb29aea30c5afdf2021-08-17T04:31:35ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032021-01-01162e024737910.1371/journal.pone.0247379Image quality and diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted breast magnetic resonance imaging: Comparison of acquired and computed images.Hye Shin AhnSung Hun KimJi Youn KimChang Suk ParkRobert GrimmYohan Son<h4>Purpose</h4>To compare the image quality of acquired diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and computed DWI and evaluate the lesion detectability and likelihood of malignancy in these datasets.<h4>Materials and methods</h4>This prospective study was approved by our institutional review board. A total of 29 women (mean age, 43.5 years) underwent DWI between August 2018 and April 2019 for 32 breast cancers and 16 benign breast lesions. Three radiologists independently reviewed the acquired DWI with b-values of 1000 and 2000 s/mm2 (A-b1000 and A-b2000) and the computed DWI with a b-value of 2000 s/mm2 (C-b2000). Image quality was scored and compared between the three DWI datasets. Lesion detectability was recorded, and the lesion's likelihood for malignancy was scored using a five-point scale.<h4>Results</h4>The A-b1000 images were superior to the A-b2000 and C-b2000 images in chest distinction, fat suppression, and overall image quality. The A-b2000 and C-b2000 images showed comparable scores for all image quality parameters. C-b2000 showed the highest values for lesion detection among all readers, although there was no statistical difference in sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy between the DWI datasets. The malignancy scores of the DWI images were not significantly different among the three readers.<h4>Conclusions</h4>A-b1000 DWI is suitable for breast lesion evaluations, considering its better image quality and comparable diagnostic values compared to that of A-b2000 and C-b2000 images. The additional use of computed high b-value DWI may have the potential to increase the detectability of breast masses.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247379
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hye Shin Ahn
Sung Hun Kim
Ji Youn Kim
Chang Suk Park
Robert Grimm
Yohan Son
spellingShingle Hye Shin Ahn
Sung Hun Kim
Ji Youn Kim
Chang Suk Park
Robert Grimm
Yohan Son
Image quality and diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted breast magnetic resonance imaging: Comparison of acquired and computed images.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Hye Shin Ahn
Sung Hun Kim
Ji Youn Kim
Chang Suk Park
Robert Grimm
Yohan Son
author_sort Hye Shin Ahn
title Image quality and diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted breast magnetic resonance imaging: Comparison of acquired and computed images.
title_short Image quality and diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted breast magnetic resonance imaging: Comparison of acquired and computed images.
title_full Image quality and diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted breast magnetic resonance imaging: Comparison of acquired and computed images.
title_fullStr Image quality and diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted breast magnetic resonance imaging: Comparison of acquired and computed images.
title_full_unstemmed Image quality and diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted breast magnetic resonance imaging: Comparison of acquired and computed images.
title_sort image quality and diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted breast magnetic resonance imaging: comparison of acquired and computed images.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2021-01-01
description <h4>Purpose</h4>To compare the image quality of acquired diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and computed DWI and evaluate the lesion detectability and likelihood of malignancy in these datasets.<h4>Materials and methods</h4>This prospective study was approved by our institutional review board. A total of 29 women (mean age, 43.5 years) underwent DWI between August 2018 and April 2019 for 32 breast cancers and 16 benign breast lesions. Three radiologists independently reviewed the acquired DWI with b-values of 1000 and 2000 s/mm2 (A-b1000 and A-b2000) and the computed DWI with a b-value of 2000 s/mm2 (C-b2000). Image quality was scored and compared between the three DWI datasets. Lesion detectability was recorded, and the lesion's likelihood for malignancy was scored using a five-point scale.<h4>Results</h4>The A-b1000 images were superior to the A-b2000 and C-b2000 images in chest distinction, fat suppression, and overall image quality. The A-b2000 and C-b2000 images showed comparable scores for all image quality parameters. C-b2000 showed the highest values for lesion detection among all readers, although there was no statistical difference in sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy between the DWI datasets. The malignancy scores of the DWI images were not significantly different among the three readers.<h4>Conclusions</h4>A-b1000 DWI is suitable for breast lesion evaluations, considering its better image quality and comparable diagnostic values compared to that of A-b2000 and C-b2000 images. The additional use of computed high b-value DWI may have the potential to increase the detectability of breast masses.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247379
work_keys_str_mv AT hyeshinahn imagequalityanddiagnosticvalueofdiffusionweightedbreastmagneticresonanceimagingcomparisonofacquiredandcomputedimages
AT sunghunkim imagequalityanddiagnosticvalueofdiffusionweightedbreastmagneticresonanceimagingcomparisonofacquiredandcomputedimages
AT jiyounkim imagequalityanddiagnosticvalueofdiffusionweightedbreastmagneticresonanceimagingcomparisonofacquiredandcomputedimages
AT changsukpark imagequalityanddiagnosticvalueofdiffusionweightedbreastmagneticresonanceimagingcomparisonofacquiredandcomputedimages
AT robertgrimm imagequalityanddiagnosticvalueofdiffusionweightedbreastmagneticresonanceimagingcomparisonofacquiredandcomputedimages
AT yohanson imagequalityanddiagnosticvalueofdiffusionweightedbreastmagneticresonanceimagingcomparisonofacquiredandcomputedimages
_version_ 1721205472842743808