Evaluation of Cognitive Function in Trials Testing New-Generation Hormonal Therapy in Patients with Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review
In patients with prostate cancer, earlier use and longer duration of new-generation hormonal therapy (NGHT), added to androgen deprivation therapy, requires careful evaluation of cognitive function. The aim of this systematic review is to describe the evidence about cognitive function in all the ran...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2020-09-01
|
Series: | Cancers |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/12/9/2568 |
id |
doaj-c287d13d6e8344d68c854bb5cc1bce2f |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-c287d13d6e8344d68c854bb5cc1bce2f2020-11-25T03:56:55ZengMDPI AGCancers2072-66942020-09-01122568256810.3390/cancers12092568Evaluation of Cognitive Function in Trials Testing New-Generation Hormonal Therapy in Patients with Prostate Cancer: A Systematic ReviewLaura Marandino0Francesca Vignani1Consuelo Buttigliero2Teresa Gamba3Andrea Necchi4Marcello Tucci5Massimo Di Maio6Department of Oncology, University of Turin, 10043 Torino, ItalyMedical Oncology, Ordine Mauriziano Hospital, 10128 Torino, ItalyDepartment of Oncology, University of Turin, 10043 Torino, ItalyDepartment of Oncology, University of Turin, 10043 Torino, ItalyMedical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Fondazione IRCCS, 20133 Milano, ItalyMedical Oncology, Cardinal Massaia Hospital, 14100 Asti, ItalyDepartment of Oncology, University of Turin, 10043 Torino, ItalyIn patients with prostate cancer, earlier use and longer duration of new-generation hormonal therapy (NGHT), added to androgen deprivation therapy, requires careful evaluation of cognitive function. The aim of this systematic review is to describe the evidence about cognitive function in all the randomized trials (RCTs) testing NGHT (abiraterone, enzalutamide, apalutamide, darolutamide). We assessed the availability of both investigator-assessed cognitive impairment and disorders and patient-reported evaluation of cognitive function. Nineteen RCTs (17,617 patients) were included. The investigator-based evaluation of cognitive impairment was available in seven RCTs (36.8%). In total, 19/19 RCTs (100%) included patient-reported outcomes (PROs) collection, but PRO tools adopted allowed evaluation of cognitive function in two RCTs (10.5%). Among them, PRO-based cognitive function results were presented only in one RCT (5.3%): in ENZAMET, mean changes from baseline were worse with enzalutamide than with placebo, but deterioration-free survival favored enzalutamide. Despite cognitive deterioration could be relevant, clinical development of NGHT has not included a systematic evaluation of cognitive function. Assessment by investigators is at risk of underreporting, and commonly used PROs do not allow proper cognitive function analysis. Furthermore, the methodology of analysis can jeopardize the interpretation of results. Although direct comparisons are scanty, there could be differences between different NGHTs.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/12/9/2568cognitive functionprostate cancerabirateroneenzalutamideapalutamidedarolutamide |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Laura Marandino Francesca Vignani Consuelo Buttigliero Teresa Gamba Andrea Necchi Marcello Tucci Massimo Di Maio |
spellingShingle |
Laura Marandino Francesca Vignani Consuelo Buttigliero Teresa Gamba Andrea Necchi Marcello Tucci Massimo Di Maio Evaluation of Cognitive Function in Trials Testing New-Generation Hormonal Therapy in Patients with Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review Cancers cognitive function prostate cancer abiraterone enzalutamide apalutamide darolutamide |
author_facet |
Laura Marandino Francesca Vignani Consuelo Buttigliero Teresa Gamba Andrea Necchi Marcello Tucci Massimo Di Maio |
author_sort |
Laura Marandino |
title |
Evaluation of Cognitive Function in Trials Testing New-Generation Hormonal Therapy in Patients with Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review |
title_short |
Evaluation of Cognitive Function in Trials Testing New-Generation Hormonal Therapy in Patients with Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review |
title_full |
Evaluation of Cognitive Function in Trials Testing New-Generation Hormonal Therapy in Patients with Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation of Cognitive Function in Trials Testing New-Generation Hormonal Therapy in Patients with Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of Cognitive Function in Trials Testing New-Generation Hormonal Therapy in Patients with Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review |
title_sort |
evaluation of cognitive function in trials testing new-generation hormonal therapy in patients with prostate cancer: a systematic review |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Cancers |
issn |
2072-6694 |
publishDate |
2020-09-01 |
description |
In patients with prostate cancer, earlier use and longer duration of new-generation hormonal therapy (NGHT), added to androgen deprivation therapy, requires careful evaluation of cognitive function. The aim of this systematic review is to describe the evidence about cognitive function in all the randomized trials (RCTs) testing NGHT (abiraterone, enzalutamide, apalutamide, darolutamide). We assessed the availability of both investigator-assessed cognitive impairment and disorders and patient-reported evaluation of cognitive function. Nineteen RCTs (17,617 patients) were included. The investigator-based evaluation of cognitive impairment was available in seven RCTs (36.8%). In total, 19/19 RCTs (100%) included patient-reported outcomes (PROs) collection, but PRO tools adopted allowed evaluation of cognitive function in two RCTs (10.5%). Among them, PRO-based cognitive function results were presented only in one RCT (5.3%): in ENZAMET, mean changes from baseline were worse with enzalutamide than with placebo, but deterioration-free survival favored enzalutamide. Despite cognitive deterioration could be relevant, clinical development of NGHT has not included a systematic evaluation of cognitive function. Assessment by investigators is at risk of underreporting, and commonly used PROs do not allow proper cognitive function analysis. Furthermore, the methodology of analysis can jeopardize the interpretation of results. Although direct comparisons are scanty, there could be differences between different NGHTs. |
topic |
cognitive function prostate cancer abiraterone enzalutamide apalutamide darolutamide |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/12/9/2568 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT lauramarandino evaluationofcognitivefunctionintrialstestingnewgenerationhormonaltherapyinpatientswithprostatecancerasystematicreview AT francescavignani evaluationofcognitivefunctionintrialstestingnewgenerationhormonaltherapyinpatientswithprostatecancerasystematicreview AT consuelobuttigliero evaluationofcognitivefunctionintrialstestingnewgenerationhormonaltherapyinpatientswithprostatecancerasystematicreview AT teresagamba evaluationofcognitivefunctionintrialstestingnewgenerationhormonaltherapyinpatientswithprostatecancerasystematicreview AT andreanecchi evaluationofcognitivefunctionintrialstestingnewgenerationhormonaltherapyinpatientswithprostatecancerasystematicreview AT marcellotucci evaluationofcognitivefunctionintrialstestingnewgenerationhormonaltherapyinpatientswithprostatecancerasystematicreview AT massimodimaio evaluationofcognitivefunctionintrialstestingnewgenerationhormonaltherapyinpatientswithprostatecancerasystematicreview |
_version_ |
1724462992019423232 |