Evaluation of Cognitive Function in Trials Testing New-Generation Hormonal Therapy in Patients with Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review

In patients with prostate cancer, earlier use and longer duration of new-generation hormonal therapy (NGHT), added to androgen deprivation therapy, requires careful evaluation of cognitive function. The aim of this systematic review is to describe the evidence about cognitive function in all the ran...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Laura Marandino, Francesca Vignani, Consuelo Buttigliero, Teresa Gamba, Andrea Necchi, Marcello Tucci, Massimo Di Maio
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-09-01
Series:Cancers
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/12/9/2568
id doaj-c287d13d6e8344d68c854bb5cc1bce2f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c287d13d6e8344d68c854bb5cc1bce2f2020-11-25T03:56:55ZengMDPI AGCancers2072-66942020-09-01122568256810.3390/cancers12092568Evaluation of Cognitive Function in Trials Testing New-Generation Hormonal Therapy in Patients with Prostate Cancer: A Systematic ReviewLaura Marandino0Francesca Vignani1Consuelo Buttigliero2Teresa Gamba3Andrea Necchi4Marcello Tucci5Massimo Di Maio6Department of Oncology, University of Turin, 10043 Torino, ItalyMedical Oncology, Ordine Mauriziano Hospital, 10128 Torino, ItalyDepartment of Oncology, University of Turin, 10043 Torino, ItalyDepartment of Oncology, University of Turin, 10043 Torino, ItalyMedical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Fondazione IRCCS, 20133 Milano, ItalyMedical Oncology, Cardinal Massaia Hospital, 14100 Asti, ItalyDepartment of Oncology, University of Turin, 10043 Torino, ItalyIn patients with prostate cancer, earlier use and longer duration of new-generation hormonal therapy (NGHT), added to androgen deprivation therapy, requires careful evaluation of cognitive function. The aim of this systematic review is to describe the evidence about cognitive function in all the randomized trials (RCTs) testing NGHT (abiraterone, enzalutamide, apalutamide, darolutamide). We assessed the availability of both investigator-assessed cognitive impairment and disorders and patient-reported evaluation of cognitive function. Nineteen RCTs (17,617 patients) were included. The investigator-based evaluation of cognitive impairment was available in seven RCTs (36.8%). In total, 19/19 RCTs (100%) included patient-reported outcomes (PROs) collection, but PRO tools adopted allowed evaluation of cognitive function in two RCTs (10.5%). Among them, PRO-based cognitive function results were presented only in one RCT (5.3%): in ENZAMET, mean changes from baseline were worse with enzalutamide than with placebo, but deterioration-free survival favored enzalutamide. Despite cognitive deterioration could be relevant, clinical development of NGHT has not included a systematic evaluation of cognitive function. Assessment by investigators is at risk of underreporting, and commonly used PROs do not allow proper cognitive function analysis. Furthermore, the methodology of analysis can jeopardize the interpretation of results. Although direct comparisons are scanty, there could be differences between different NGHTs.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/12/9/2568cognitive functionprostate cancerabirateroneenzalutamideapalutamidedarolutamide
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Laura Marandino
Francesca Vignani
Consuelo Buttigliero
Teresa Gamba
Andrea Necchi
Marcello Tucci
Massimo Di Maio
spellingShingle Laura Marandino
Francesca Vignani
Consuelo Buttigliero
Teresa Gamba
Andrea Necchi
Marcello Tucci
Massimo Di Maio
Evaluation of Cognitive Function in Trials Testing New-Generation Hormonal Therapy in Patients with Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review
Cancers
cognitive function
prostate cancer
abiraterone
enzalutamide
apalutamide
darolutamide
author_facet Laura Marandino
Francesca Vignani
Consuelo Buttigliero
Teresa Gamba
Andrea Necchi
Marcello Tucci
Massimo Di Maio
author_sort Laura Marandino
title Evaluation of Cognitive Function in Trials Testing New-Generation Hormonal Therapy in Patients with Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review
title_short Evaluation of Cognitive Function in Trials Testing New-Generation Hormonal Therapy in Patients with Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review
title_full Evaluation of Cognitive Function in Trials Testing New-Generation Hormonal Therapy in Patients with Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Evaluation of Cognitive Function in Trials Testing New-Generation Hormonal Therapy in Patients with Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Cognitive Function in Trials Testing New-Generation Hormonal Therapy in Patients with Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review
title_sort evaluation of cognitive function in trials testing new-generation hormonal therapy in patients with prostate cancer: a systematic review
publisher MDPI AG
series Cancers
issn 2072-6694
publishDate 2020-09-01
description In patients with prostate cancer, earlier use and longer duration of new-generation hormonal therapy (NGHT), added to androgen deprivation therapy, requires careful evaluation of cognitive function. The aim of this systematic review is to describe the evidence about cognitive function in all the randomized trials (RCTs) testing NGHT (abiraterone, enzalutamide, apalutamide, darolutamide). We assessed the availability of both investigator-assessed cognitive impairment and disorders and patient-reported evaluation of cognitive function. Nineteen RCTs (17,617 patients) were included. The investigator-based evaluation of cognitive impairment was available in seven RCTs (36.8%). In total, 19/19 RCTs (100%) included patient-reported outcomes (PROs) collection, but PRO tools adopted allowed evaluation of cognitive function in two RCTs (10.5%). Among them, PRO-based cognitive function results were presented only in one RCT (5.3%): in ENZAMET, mean changes from baseline were worse with enzalutamide than with placebo, but deterioration-free survival favored enzalutamide. Despite cognitive deterioration could be relevant, clinical development of NGHT has not included a systematic evaluation of cognitive function. Assessment by investigators is at risk of underreporting, and commonly used PROs do not allow proper cognitive function analysis. Furthermore, the methodology of analysis can jeopardize the interpretation of results. Although direct comparisons are scanty, there could be differences between different NGHTs.
topic cognitive function
prostate cancer
abiraterone
enzalutamide
apalutamide
darolutamide
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/12/9/2568
work_keys_str_mv AT lauramarandino evaluationofcognitivefunctionintrialstestingnewgenerationhormonaltherapyinpatientswithprostatecancerasystematicreview
AT francescavignani evaluationofcognitivefunctionintrialstestingnewgenerationhormonaltherapyinpatientswithprostatecancerasystematicreview
AT consuelobuttigliero evaluationofcognitivefunctionintrialstestingnewgenerationhormonaltherapyinpatientswithprostatecancerasystematicreview
AT teresagamba evaluationofcognitivefunctionintrialstestingnewgenerationhormonaltherapyinpatientswithprostatecancerasystematicreview
AT andreanecchi evaluationofcognitivefunctionintrialstestingnewgenerationhormonaltherapyinpatientswithprostatecancerasystematicreview
AT marcellotucci evaluationofcognitivefunctionintrialstestingnewgenerationhormonaltherapyinpatientswithprostatecancerasystematicreview
AT massimodimaio evaluationofcognitivefunctionintrialstestingnewgenerationhormonaltherapyinpatientswithprostatecancerasystematicreview
_version_ 1724462992019423232