Estimating GFR by Serum Creatinine, Cystatin C, and β2-Microglobulin in Older Adults: Results From the Canadian Study of Longevity in Type 1 Diabetes

• Main Authors: Daniel Scarr, Petter Bjornstad, Leif E. Lovblom, Julie A. Lovshin, Genevieve Boulet, Yuliya Lytvyn, Mohammed A. Farooqi, Vesta Lai, Andrej Orszag, Alanna Weisman, Hillary A. Keenan, Michael H. Brent, Narinder Paul, Vera Bril, David Z.I. Cherney, Bruce A. Perkins
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier 2019-06-01
• Series: Kidney International Reports
• Online Access: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468024919300713

Introduction: Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is routinely used for clinical assessment of kidney function. However, the accuracy of estimating equations in older adults is uncertain. Methods: In 66 adults with ≥50 years type 1 diabetes (T1D) duration and 73 nondiabetic controls from age/sex-matched subgroups (65 ± 8 years old and 77[55%] were women) we evaluated the performance of estimated GFR (eGFR) by creatinine (Modification of Diet and Renal Disease [MDRD], Chronic Kidney Disease–Epidemiology [CKD-EPI]cr), cystatin C (CKD-EPIcys, CKD-EPIcr-cys), and β2-microglobulin (β2M) compared with measured GFR by inulin clearance (mGFR). Performance was evaluated using metrics of bias (mean difference), precision (SD), and accuracy (proportion of eGFR that differed by >20% of mGFR). Results: Mean mGFR was 104 ± 18 ml/min per 1.73 m2 (range: 70–154 ml/min per 1.73 m2) and was not different between T1D and controls (103 ± 17 vs. 105 ± 19 ml/min per 1.73 m2, P = 0.39). All equations significantly underestimated mGFR (bias: −15 to −30 ml/min per 1.73 m2, P < 0.001 for all comparisons) except for β2M, which had bias of 1.9 ml/min per 1.73 m2 (P = 0.61). Bias was greatest in cystatin C–based equations. Precision was lowest for β2M (SD: 43.5 ml/min per 1.73 m2, P < 0.001 for each comparison). Accuracy was lowest for CKD-EPIcysC (69.1%, P < 0.001 for each comparison). Cystatin C–based equations demonstrated greater bias and lower accuracy in older age subgroups (<60, 60–69, ≥70 years). All equations demonstrated greater bias across higher ranges of mGFR (60–89, 90–119, ≥120 ml/min per 1.73 m2). Results were similar between T1D and controls except that β2M had lower performance in T1D. Conclusion: Better estimates of GFR in older adults are needed for research and clinical practice, as this subgroup of the population has an amplified risk for the development of chronic kidney disease (CKD) that requires accurate GFR estimation methods. Keywords: β2-microglobulin, creatinine, cystatin C, estimating equations, glomerular filtration rate, inulin clearance, older adults, type 1 diabetes