On the comparisons of tropical relative humidity in the lower and middle troposphere among COSMIC radio occultations and MERRA and ECMWF data sets

The spatial variability of the tropical tropospheric relative humidity (RH) throughout the vertical extent of the troposphere is examined using Global Positioning System Radio Occultation (GPSRO) observations from the Constellation Observing System for Meteorology, Ionosphere, and Climate (COSMIC) m...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: P. Vergados, A. J. Mannucci, C. O. Ao, J. H. Jiang, H. Su
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2015-04-01
Series:Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
Online Access:http://www.atmos-meas-tech.net/8/1789/2015/amt-8-1789-2015.pdf
id doaj-c2ad457fddb14b5a8aabd8a21d4ecf68
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c2ad457fddb14b5a8aabd8a21d4ecf682020-11-24T21:27:36ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Measurement Techniques1867-13811867-85482015-04-01841789179710.5194/amt-8-1789-2015On the comparisons of tropical relative humidity in the lower and middle troposphere among COSMIC radio occultations and MERRA and ECMWF data setsP. Vergados0A. J. Mannucci1C. O. Ao2J. H. Jiang3H. Su4Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USAJet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USAJet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USAJet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USAJet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USAThe spatial variability of the tropical tropospheric relative humidity (RH) throughout the vertical extent of the troposphere is examined using Global Positioning System Radio Occultation (GPSRO) observations from the Constellation Observing System for Meteorology, Ionosphere, and Climate (COSMIC) mission. These high vertical resolution observations capture the detailed structure and moisture budget of the Hadley Cell circulation. We compare the COSMIC observations with the European Center for Medium-range Weather Forecast (ECMWF) Reanalysis Interim (ERA-Interim) and the Modern-Era Retrospective analysis for Research and Applications (MERRA) climatologies. Qualitatively, the spatial pattern of RH in all data sets matches up remarkably well, capturing distinct features of the general circulation. However, RH discrepancies exist between ERA-Interim and COSMIC data sets that are noticeable across the tropical boundary layer. Specifically, ERA-Interim shows a drier Intertropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ) by 15–20% compared to both COSMIC and MERRA data sets, but this difference decreases with altitude. Unlike ECMWF, MERRA shows an excellent agreement with the COSMIC observations except above 400 hPa, where GPSRO observations capture drier air by 5–10%. RH climatologies were also used to evaluate intraseasonal variability. The results indicate that the tropical middle troposphere at ±5–25° is most sensitive to seasonal variations. COSMIC and MERRA data sets capture the same magnitude of the seasonal variability, but ERA-Interim shows a weaker seasonal fluctuation up to 10% in the middle troposphere inside the dry air subsidence regions of the Hadley Cell. Over the ITCZ, RH varies by maximum 9% between winter and summer.http://www.atmos-meas-tech.net/8/1789/2015/amt-8-1789-2015.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author P. Vergados
A. J. Mannucci
C. O. Ao
J. H. Jiang
H. Su
spellingShingle P. Vergados
A. J. Mannucci
C. O. Ao
J. H. Jiang
H. Su
On the comparisons of tropical relative humidity in the lower and middle troposphere among COSMIC radio occultations and MERRA and ECMWF data sets
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
author_facet P. Vergados
A. J. Mannucci
C. O. Ao
J. H. Jiang
H. Su
author_sort P. Vergados
title On the comparisons of tropical relative humidity in the lower and middle troposphere among COSMIC radio occultations and MERRA and ECMWF data sets
title_short On the comparisons of tropical relative humidity in the lower and middle troposphere among COSMIC radio occultations and MERRA and ECMWF data sets
title_full On the comparisons of tropical relative humidity in the lower and middle troposphere among COSMIC radio occultations and MERRA and ECMWF data sets
title_fullStr On the comparisons of tropical relative humidity in the lower and middle troposphere among COSMIC radio occultations and MERRA and ECMWF data sets
title_full_unstemmed On the comparisons of tropical relative humidity in the lower and middle troposphere among COSMIC radio occultations and MERRA and ECMWF data sets
title_sort on the comparisons of tropical relative humidity in the lower and middle troposphere among cosmic radio occultations and merra and ecmwf data sets
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
issn 1867-1381
1867-8548
publishDate 2015-04-01
description The spatial variability of the tropical tropospheric relative humidity (RH) throughout the vertical extent of the troposphere is examined using Global Positioning System Radio Occultation (GPSRO) observations from the Constellation Observing System for Meteorology, Ionosphere, and Climate (COSMIC) mission. These high vertical resolution observations capture the detailed structure and moisture budget of the Hadley Cell circulation. We compare the COSMIC observations with the European Center for Medium-range Weather Forecast (ECMWF) Reanalysis Interim (ERA-Interim) and the Modern-Era Retrospective analysis for Research and Applications (MERRA) climatologies. Qualitatively, the spatial pattern of RH in all data sets matches up remarkably well, capturing distinct features of the general circulation. However, RH discrepancies exist between ERA-Interim and COSMIC data sets that are noticeable across the tropical boundary layer. Specifically, ERA-Interim shows a drier Intertropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ) by 15–20% compared to both COSMIC and MERRA data sets, but this difference decreases with altitude. Unlike ECMWF, MERRA shows an excellent agreement with the COSMIC observations except above 400 hPa, where GPSRO observations capture drier air by 5–10%. RH climatologies were also used to evaluate intraseasonal variability. The results indicate that the tropical middle troposphere at ±5–25° is most sensitive to seasonal variations. COSMIC and MERRA data sets capture the same magnitude of the seasonal variability, but ERA-Interim shows a weaker seasonal fluctuation up to 10% in the middle troposphere inside the dry air subsidence regions of the Hadley Cell. Over the ITCZ, RH varies by maximum 9% between winter and summer.
url http://www.atmos-meas-tech.net/8/1789/2015/amt-8-1789-2015.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT pvergados onthecomparisonsoftropicalrelativehumidityinthelowerandmiddletroposphereamongcosmicradiooccultationsandmerraandecmwfdatasets
AT ajmannucci onthecomparisonsoftropicalrelativehumidityinthelowerandmiddletroposphereamongcosmicradiooccultationsandmerraandecmwfdatasets
AT coao onthecomparisonsoftropicalrelativehumidityinthelowerandmiddletroposphereamongcosmicradiooccultationsandmerraandecmwfdatasets
AT jhjiang onthecomparisonsoftropicalrelativehumidityinthelowerandmiddletroposphereamongcosmicradiooccultationsandmerraandecmwfdatasets
AT hsu onthecomparisonsoftropicalrelativehumidityinthelowerandmiddletroposphereamongcosmicradiooccultationsandmerraandecmwfdatasets
_version_ 1725974658305490944