A prospective study of differences in duodenum compared to remaining small bowel motion between radiation treatments: Implications for radiation dose escalation in carcinoma of the pancreas

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Purpose</p> <p>As a foundation for a dose escalation trial, we sought to characterize duodenal and non-duodenal small bowel organ motion between fractions of pancreatic radiation therapy.</p> <p>Patients and methods</p> <p>Nine...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wahab Sasha H, Pereira Gisele C, Wu Catherine S, Deasy Joseph O, Myerson Robert J, Parikh Parag J, Low Daniel A, Tierney Ryan M, Singh Anurag K, Mutic MS Sasa, Grigsby Perry W, Hope Andrew J
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2006-09-01
Series:Radiation Oncology
Online Access:http://www.ro-journal.com/content/1/1/33
id doaj-c2bbfd31245c4cb5b5d8bcbcc30e86a0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c2bbfd31245c4cb5b5d8bcbcc30e86a02020-11-25T00:30:18ZengBMCRadiation Oncology1748-717X2006-09-01113310.1186/1748-717X-1-33A prospective study of differences in duodenum compared to remaining small bowel motion between radiation treatments: Implications for radiation dose escalation in carcinoma of the pancreasWahab Sasha HPereira Gisele CWu Catherine SDeasy Joseph OMyerson Robert JParikh Parag JLow Daniel ATierney Ryan MSingh Anurag KMutic MS SasaGrigsby Perry WHope Andrew J<p>Abstract</p> <p>Purpose</p> <p>As a foundation for a dose escalation trial, we sought to characterize duodenal and non-duodenal small bowel organ motion between fractions of pancreatic radiation therapy.</p> <p>Patients and methods</p> <p>Nine patients (4 women, 5 men) undergoing radiation therapy were enrolled in this prospective study. The patients had up to four weekly CT scans performed during their course of radiation therapy. Pancreas, duodenum and non-duodenal small bowel were then contoured for each CT scan. On the initial scan, a four-field plan was generated to fully cover the pancreas. This plan was registered to each subsequent CT scan. Dose-volume histogram (DVH) analyses were performed for the duodenum, non-duodenal small bowel, large bowel, and pancreas.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>With significant individual variation, the volume of duodenum receiving at least 80% of the prescribed dose was consistently greater than the remaining small bowel. In the patient with the largest inter-fraction variation, the fractional volume of non-duodenal small bowel irradiated to at least the 80% isodose line ranged from 1% to 20%. In the patient with the largest inter-fraction variation, the fractional volume of duodenum irradiated to at least the 80% isodose line ranged from 30% to 100%.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The volume of small bowel irradiated during four-field pancreatic radiation therapy changes substantially between fractions. This suggests dose escalation may be possible. However, dose limits to the duodenum should be stricter than for other segments of small bowel.</p> http://www.ro-journal.com/content/1/1/33
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Wahab Sasha H
Pereira Gisele C
Wu Catherine S
Deasy Joseph O
Myerson Robert J
Parikh Parag J
Low Daniel A
Tierney Ryan M
Singh Anurag K
Mutic MS Sasa
Grigsby Perry W
Hope Andrew J
spellingShingle Wahab Sasha H
Pereira Gisele C
Wu Catherine S
Deasy Joseph O
Myerson Robert J
Parikh Parag J
Low Daniel A
Tierney Ryan M
Singh Anurag K
Mutic MS Sasa
Grigsby Perry W
Hope Andrew J
A prospective study of differences in duodenum compared to remaining small bowel motion between radiation treatments: Implications for radiation dose escalation in carcinoma of the pancreas
Radiation Oncology
author_facet Wahab Sasha H
Pereira Gisele C
Wu Catherine S
Deasy Joseph O
Myerson Robert J
Parikh Parag J
Low Daniel A
Tierney Ryan M
Singh Anurag K
Mutic MS Sasa
Grigsby Perry W
Hope Andrew J
author_sort Wahab Sasha H
title A prospective study of differences in duodenum compared to remaining small bowel motion between radiation treatments: Implications for radiation dose escalation in carcinoma of the pancreas
title_short A prospective study of differences in duodenum compared to remaining small bowel motion between radiation treatments: Implications for radiation dose escalation in carcinoma of the pancreas
title_full A prospective study of differences in duodenum compared to remaining small bowel motion between radiation treatments: Implications for radiation dose escalation in carcinoma of the pancreas
title_fullStr A prospective study of differences in duodenum compared to remaining small bowel motion between radiation treatments: Implications for radiation dose escalation in carcinoma of the pancreas
title_full_unstemmed A prospective study of differences in duodenum compared to remaining small bowel motion between radiation treatments: Implications for radiation dose escalation in carcinoma of the pancreas
title_sort prospective study of differences in duodenum compared to remaining small bowel motion between radiation treatments: implications for radiation dose escalation in carcinoma of the pancreas
publisher BMC
series Radiation Oncology
issn 1748-717X
publishDate 2006-09-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Purpose</p> <p>As a foundation for a dose escalation trial, we sought to characterize duodenal and non-duodenal small bowel organ motion between fractions of pancreatic radiation therapy.</p> <p>Patients and methods</p> <p>Nine patients (4 women, 5 men) undergoing radiation therapy were enrolled in this prospective study. The patients had up to four weekly CT scans performed during their course of radiation therapy. Pancreas, duodenum and non-duodenal small bowel were then contoured for each CT scan. On the initial scan, a four-field plan was generated to fully cover the pancreas. This plan was registered to each subsequent CT scan. Dose-volume histogram (DVH) analyses were performed for the duodenum, non-duodenal small bowel, large bowel, and pancreas.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>With significant individual variation, the volume of duodenum receiving at least 80% of the prescribed dose was consistently greater than the remaining small bowel. In the patient with the largest inter-fraction variation, the fractional volume of non-duodenal small bowel irradiated to at least the 80% isodose line ranged from 1% to 20%. In the patient with the largest inter-fraction variation, the fractional volume of duodenum irradiated to at least the 80% isodose line ranged from 30% to 100%.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The volume of small bowel irradiated during four-field pancreatic radiation therapy changes substantially between fractions. This suggests dose escalation may be possible. However, dose limits to the duodenum should be stricter than for other segments of small bowel.</p>
url http://www.ro-journal.com/content/1/1/33
work_keys_str_mv AT wahabsashah aprospectivestudyofdifferencesinduodenumcomparedtoremainingsmallbowelmotionbetweenradiationtreatmentsimplicationsforradiationdoseescalationincarcinomaofthepancreas
AT pereiragiselec aprospectivestudyofdifferencesinduodenumcomparedtoremainingsmallbowelmotionbetweenradiationtreatmentsimplicationsforradiationdoseescalationincarcinomaofthepancreas
AT wucatherines aprospectivestudyofdifferencesinduodenumcomparedtoremainingsmallbowelmotionbetweenradiationtreatmentsimplicationsforradiationdoseescalationincarcinomaofthepancreas
AT deasyjosepho aprospectivestudyofdifferencesinduodenumcomparedtoremainingsmallbowelmotionbetweenradiationtreatmentsimplicationsforradiationdoseescalationincarcinomaofthepancreas
AT myersonrobertj aprospectivestudyofdifferencesinduodenumcomparedtoremainingsmallbowelmotionbetweenradiationtreatmentsimplicationsforradiationdoseescalationincarcinomaofthepancreas
AT parikhparagj aprospectivestudyofdifferencesinduodenumcomparedtoremainingsmallbowelmotionbetweenradiationtreatmentsimplicationsforradiationdoseescalationincarcinomaofthepancreas
AT lowdaniela aprospectivestudyofdifferencesinduodenumcomparedtoremainingsmallbowelmotionbetweenradiationtreatmentsimplicationsforradiationdoseescalationincarcinomaofthepancreas
AT tierneyryanm aprospectivestudyofdifferencesinduodenumcomparedtoremainingsmallbowelmotionbetweenradiationtreatmentsimplicationsforradiationdoseescalationincarcinomaofthepancreas
AT singhanuragk aprospectivestudyofdifferencesinduodenumcomparedtoremainingsmallbowelmotionbetweenradiationtreatmentsimplicationsforradiationdoseescalationincarcinomaofthepancreas
AT muticmssasa aprospectivestudyofdifferencesinduodenumcomparedtoremainingsmallbowelmotionbetweenradiationtreatmentsimplicationsforradiationdoseescalationincarcinomaofthepancreas
AT grigsbyperryw aprospectivestudyofdifferencesinduodenumcomparedtoremainingsmallbowelmotionbetweenradiationtreatmentsimplicationsforradiationdoseescalationincarcinomaofthepancreas
AT hopeandrewj aprospectivestudyofdifferencesinduodenumcomparedtoremainingsmallbowelmotionbetweenradiationtreatmentsimplicationsforradiationdoseescalationincarcinomaofthepancreas
AT wahabsashah prospectivestudyofdifferencesinduodenumcomparedtoremainingsmallbowelmotionbetweenradiationtreatmentsimplicationsforradiationdoseescalationincarcinomaofthepancreas
AT pereiragiselec prospectivestudyofdifferencesinduodenumcomparedtoremainingsmallbowelmotionbetweenradiationtreatmentsimplicationsforradiationdoseescalationincarcinomaofthepancreas
AT wucatherines prospectivestudyofdifferencesinduodenumcomparedtoremainingsmallbowelmotionbetweenradiationtreatmentsimplicationsforradiationdoseescalationincarcinomaofthepancreas
AT deasyjosepho prospectivestudyofdifferencesinduodenumcomparedtoremainingsmallbowelmotionbetweenradiationtreatmentsimplicationsforradiationdoseescalationincarcinomaofthepancreas
AT myersonrobertj prospectivestudyofdifferencesinduodenumcomparedtoremainingsmallbowelmotionbetweenradiationtreatmentsimplicationsforradiationdoseescalationincarcinomaofthepancreas
AT parikhparagj prospectivestudyofdifferencesinduodenumcomparedtoremainingsmallbowelmotionbetweenradiationtreatmentsimplicationsforradiationdoseescalationincarcinomaofthepancreas
AT lowdaniela prospectivestudyofdifferencesinduodenumcomparedtoremainingsmallbowelmotionbetweenradiationtreatmentsimplicationsforradiationdoseescalationincarcinomaofthepancreas
AT tierneyryanm prospectivestudyofdifferencesinduodenumcomparedtoremainingsmallbowelmotionbetweenradiationtreatmentsimplicationsforradiationdoseescalationincarcinomaofthepancreas
AT singhanuragk prospectivestudyofdifferencesinduodenumcomparedtoremainingsmallbowelmotionbetweenradiationtreatmentsimplicationsforradiationdoseescalationincarcinomaofthepancreas
AT muticmssasa prospectivestudyofdifferencesinduodenumcomparedtoremainingsmallbowelmotionbetweenradiationtreatmentsimplicationsforradiationdoseescalationincarcinomaofthepancreas
AT grigsbyperryw prospectivestudyofdifferencesinduodenumcomparedtoremainingsmallbowelmotionbetweenradiationtreatmentsimplicationsforradiationdoseescalationincarcinomaofthepancreas
AT hopeandrewj prospectivestudyofdifferencesinduodenumcomparedtoremainingsmallbowelmotionbetweenradiationtreatmentsimplicationsforradiationdoseescalationincarcinomaofthepancreas
_version_ 1725327540519698432