IMPLEMENTASI LEMBAGA PRAPERADILAN UNTUK PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM HAK-HAK TERSANGKA (Studi Kasus di Pengadilan Negeri Tenggarong)

• Main Author: Sujiono Sujiono
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: University of Brawijaya 2014-08-01
• Series: Arena Hukum
• Subjects: Praperadilan
• Online Access: http://arenahukum.ub.ac.id/index.php/arena/article/view/139
• ISSN: 0126-0235; 2527-4406

Abstract In principle, the institution is still relevant pretrial maintained and do not need to be replaced with the judge commissioner. It's just the rules of pretrial in the Criminal Code needs to be refined. There are two important things that need to be revised so that should not be a dilemma in practice. The first is about the verdict fall. According to Article 82 paragraph (1) letter d Criminal Code, if the case has not been checked pretrial, pretrial fall if the case should be decided principally already checked. True, that on the legitimacy of the arrest or detention-which was filed pretrial can be examined together with the examination of the subject matter, so it does not matter if only pretrial disqualified because the subject matter has begun to be examined. However, it would mubazirnya judicial institution established by law, if only by reason of the subject matter already checked then pretrial shall be disqualified Key words: pretrial agency, legal protection, rights of suspects Abstrak Pada prinsipnya lembaga praperadilan masih relevan dipertahankan dan tidak perlu diganti dengan hakim komisaris. Hanya saja aturan-aturan tentang praperadilan di dalam KUHAP perlu disempurnakan. Ada dua hal penting yang perlu direvisi supaya jangan menjadi dilema dalam praktik. Adapun yang pertama ialah tentang putusan gugur. Menurut Pasal 82 Ayat (1) huruf d KUHAP, apabila perkara praperadilan belum selesai diperiksa, praperadilan harus diputuskan gugur apabila perkara pokoknya sudah mulai diperiksa. Benar, bahwa tentang sah-tidaknya penangkapan atau penahanan yang tadinya dimohonkan praperadilan bisa saja diperiksa bersama-sama dengan pemeriksaan perkara pokok, sehingga tidak menjadi masalah andaikan praperadilan dinyatakan gugur karena perkara pokok sudah mulai diperiksa. Akan tetapi alangkah mubazirnya lembaga peradilan yang dibentuk berdasarkan undang-undang, apabila hanya dengan alasan perkara pokok sudah mulai diperiksa lantas praperadilan harus dinyatakan gugur. Kata kunci: lembaga praperadilan, perlindungan hukum, hak-hak tersangka