Deliberation level of constitutional debates in Georgian Parliament
In the given paper a discourse quality index (DQI) tool, rooted to criteria elaborated by Jurgen Habermas’s in his discourse ethics, will be modified and used to assess the deliberation level of the 1995 Georgian Parliament. The methodology will accurately represent important principles of deliberat...
Main Authors: | Napetvaridze Vladimeri, Tskhovrebadze Tina, Niparishvili Tamila, Niparishvili Kristina |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | ces |
Published: |
Sciendo
2020-04-01
|
Series: | Politics in Central Europe |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.2478/pce-2020-0014 |
Similar Items
-
JA ES BŪTU SMUKS, ES GRIBĒTU BŪT MEITENE! (‘If I Were Pretty, I Would Like To Be A Girl!’). Debating Transsexualism In The Latvian Parliament
by: CHOJNICKA JOANNA
Published: (2014-12-01) -
Real Control in the Georgian System of Constitutional Justice
by: Elene Gabunia
Published: (2019-12-01) -
Separation of powers according to the new amendments to the constitution of Georgia-problems and prospects
by: George Goradze
Published: (2019-06-01) -
Deliberation in parliaments: a review of the empirical, rhetorical and systemic approaches
by: Carlos Rico Motos -
Sensationalism in argumentation: a case of the Zimbabwean parliament debates
by: Jakaza, Ernest
Published: (2019-12-01)