Moho Density Contrast in Central Eurasia from GOCE Gravity Gradients

Seismic data are primarily used in studies of the Earth’s inner structure. Since large parts of the world are not yet sufficiently covered by seismic surveys, products from the Earth’s satellite observation systems have more often been used for this purpose in recent years. In this study we use the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mehdi Eshagh, Matloob Hussain, Robert Tenzer, Mohsen Romeshkani
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2016-05-01
Series:Remote Sensing
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/8/5/418
id doaj-c334642a5960431da83d463bc531bbcf
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c334642a5960431da83d463bc531bbcf2020-11-25T01:05:35ZengMDPI AGRemote Sensing2072-42922016-05-018541810.3390/rs8050418rs8050418Moho Density Contrast in Central Eurasia from GOCE Gravity GradientsMehdi Eshagh0Matloob Hussain1Robert Tenzer2Mohsen Romeshkani3Department of Engineering Science, University West, Trollhättan 46186, SwedenDepartment of Engineering Science, University West, Trollhättan 46186, SwedenThe Key Laboratory of Geospace Environment and Geodesy, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, ChinaSchool of Surveying and Geospatial Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran 14395-515, IranSeismic data are primarily used in studies of the Earth’s inner structure. Since large parts of the world are not yet sufficiently covered by seismic surveys, products from the Earth’s satellite observation systems have more often been used for this purpose in recent years. In this study we use the gravity-gradient data derived from the Gravity field and steady-state Ocean Circulation Explorer (GOCE), the elevation data from the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) and other global datasets to determine the Moho density contrast at the study area which comprises most of the Eurasian plate (including parts of surrounding continental and oceanic tectonic plates). A regional Moho recovery is realized by solving the Vening Meinesz-Moritz’s (VMM) inverse problem of isostasy and a seismic crustal model is applied to constrain the gravimetric solution. Our results reveal that the Moho density contrast reaches minima along the mid-oceanic rift zones and maxima under the continental crust. This spatial pattern closely agrees with that seen in the CRUST1.0 seismic crustal model as well as in the KTH1.0 gravimetric-seismic Moho model. However, these results differ considerably from some previously published gravimetric studies. In particular, we demonstrate that there is no significant spatial correlation between the Moho density contrast and Moho deepening under major orogens of Himalaya and Tibet. In fact, the Moho density contrast under most of the continental crustal structure is typically much more uniform.http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/8/5/418density contrastsatellite gravity missionsEurasiaMohoterrain modelTibet
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mehdi Eshagh
Matloob Hussain
Robert Tenzer
Mohsen Romeshkani
spellingShingle Mehdi Eshagh
Matloob Hussain
Robert Tenzer
Mohsen Romeshkani
Moho Density Contrast in Central Eurasia from GOCE Gravity Gradients
Remote Sensing
density contrast
satellite gravity missions
Eurasia
Moho
terrain model
Tibet
author_facet Mehdi Eshagh
Matloob Hussain
Robert Tenzer
Mohsen Romeshkani
author_sort Mehdi Eshagh
title Moho Density Contrast in Central Eurasia from GOCE Gravity Gradients
title_short Moho Density Contrast in Central Eurasia from GOCE Gravity Gradients
title_full Moho Density Contrast in Central Eurasia from GOCE Gravity Gradients
title_fullStr Moho Density Contrast in Central Eurasia from GOCE Gravity Gradients
title_full_unstemmed Moho Density Contrast in Central Eurasia from GOCE Gravity Gradients
title_sort moho density contrast in central eurasia from goce gravity gradients
publisher MDPI AG
series Remote Sensing
issn 2072-4292
publishDate 2016-05-01
description Seismic data are primarily used in studies of the Earth’s inner structure. Since large parts of the world are not yet sufficiently covered by seismic surveys, products from the Earth’s satellite observation systems have more often been used for this purpose in recent years. In this study we use the gravity-gradient data derived from the Gravity field and steady-state Ocean Circulation Explorer (GOCE), the elevation data from the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) and other global datasets to determine the Moho density contrast at the study area which comprises most of the Eurasian plate (including parts of surrounding continental and oceanic tectonic plates). A regional Moho recovery is realized by solving the Vening Meinesz-Moritz’s (VMM) inverse problem of isostasy and a seismic crustal model is applied to constrain the gravimetric solution. Our results reveal that the Moho density contrast reaches minima along the mid-oceanic rift zones and maxima under the continental crust. This spatial pattern closely agrees with that seen in the CRUST1.0 seismic crustal model as well as in the KTH1.0 gravimetric-seismic Moho model. However, these results differ considerably from some previously published gravimetric studies. In particular, we demonstrate that there is no significant spatial correlation between the Moho density contrast and Moho deepening under major orogens of Himalaya and Tibet. In fact, the Moho density contrast under most of the continental crustal structure is typically much more uniform.
topic density contrast
satellite gravity missions
Eurasia
Moho
terrain model
Tibet
url http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/8/5/418
work_keys_str_mv AT mehdieshagh mohodensitycontrastincentraleurasiafromgocegravitygradients
AT matloobhussain mohodensitycontrastincentraleurasiafromgocegravitygradients
AT roberttenzer mohodensitycontrastincentraleurasiafromgocegravitygradients
AT mohsenromeshkani mohodensitycontrastincentraleurasiafromgocegravitygradients
_version_ 1725193690815660032