Root transcriptional responses of two melon genotypes with contrasting resistance to <it>Monosporascus cannonballus</it> (Pollack <it>et</it> Uecker) infection

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p><it>Monosporascus cannonballus</it> is the main causal agent of melon vine decline disease. Several studies have been carried out mainly focused on the study of the penetration of this pathogen into melon roots, the evalu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Roig Cristina, Fita Ana, Ríos Gabino, Hammond John P, Nuez Fernando, Picó Belén
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2012-11-01
Series:BMC Genomics
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2164/13/601
id doaj-c34166a333a84f7e8e4d048d52013f38
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c34166a333a84f7e8e4d048d52013f382020-11-25T00:37:54ZengBMCBMC Genomics1471-21642012-11-0113160110.1186/1471-2164-13-601Root transcriptional responses of two melon genotypes with contrasting resistance to <it>Monosporascus cannonballus</it> (Pollack <it>et</it> Uecker) infectionRoig CristinaFita AnaRíos GabinoHammond John PNuez FernandoPicó Belén<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p><it>Monosporascus cannonballus</it> is the main causal agent of melon vine decline disease. Several studies have been carried out mainly focused on the study of the penetration of this pathogen into melon roots, the evaluation of symptoms severity on infected roots, and screening assays for breeding programs. However, a detailed molecular view on the early interaction between <it>M. cannonballus</it> and melon roots in either susceptible or resistant genotypes is lacking. In the present study, we used a melon oligo-based microarray to investigate the gene expression responses of two melon genotypes, <it>Cucumis melo</it> ‘Piel de sapo’ (‘PS’) and <it>C. melo</it> ‘Pat 81’, with contrasting resistance to the disease. This study was carried out at 1 and 3 days after infection (DPI) by <it>M. cannonballus</it>.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Our results indicate a dissimilar behavior of the susceptible <it>vs.</it> the resistant genotypes from 1 to 3 DPI. ‘PS’ responded with a more rapid infection response than ‘Pat 81’ at 1 DPI. At 3 DPI the total number of differentially expressed genes identified in ‘PS’ declined from 451 to 359, while the total number of differentially expressed transcripts in ‘Pat 81’ increased from 187 to 849. Several deregulated transcripts coded for components of Ca<sup>2+</sup> and jasmonic acid (JA) signalling pathways, as well as for other proteins related to defence mechanisms. Transcriptional differences in the activation of the JA-mediated response in ‘Pat 81’ compared to ‘PS’ suggested that JA response might be partially responsible for their observed differences in resistance.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>As a result of this study we have identified for the first time a set of candidate genes involved in the root response to the infection of the pathogen causing melon vine decline. This information is useful for understanding the disease progression and resistance mechanisms few days after inoculation.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2164/13/601
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Roig Cristina
Fita Ana
Ríos Gabino
Hammond John P
Nuez Fernando
Picó Belén
spellingShingle Roig Cristina
Fita Ana
Ríos Gabino
Hammond John P
Nuez Fernando
Picó Belén
Root transcriptional responses of two melon genotypes with contrasting resistance to <it>Monosporascus cannonballus</it> (Pollack <it>et</it> Uecker) infection
BMC Genomics
author_facet Roig Cristina
Fita Ana
Ríos Gabino
Hammond John P
Nuez Fernando
Picó Belén
author_sort Roig Cristina
title Root transcriptional responses of two melon genotypes with contrasting resistance to <it>Monosporascus cannonballus</it> (Pollack <it>et</it> Uecker) infection
title_short Root transcriptional responses of two melon genotypes with contrasting resistance to <it>Monosporascus cannonballus</it> (Pollack <it>et</it> Uecker) infection
title_full Root transcriptional responses of two melon genotypes with contrasting resistance to <it>Monosporascus cannonballus</it> (Pollack <it>et</it> Uecker) infection
title_fullStr Root transcriptional responses of two melon genotypes with contrasting resistance to <it>Monosporascus cannonballus</it> (Pollack <it>et</it> Uecker) infection
title_full_unstemmed Root transcriptional responses of two melon genotypes with contrasting resistance to <it>Monosporascus cannonballus</it> (Pollack <it>et</it> Uecker) infection
title_sort root transcriptional responses of two melon genotypes with contrasting resistance to <it>monosporascus cannonballus</it> (pollack <it>et</it> uecker) infection
publisher BMC
series BMC Genomics
issn 1471-2164
publishDate 2012-11-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p><it>Monosporascus cannonballus</it> is the main causal agent of melon vine decline disease. Several studies have been carried out mainly focused on the study of the penetration of this pathogen into melon roots, the evaluation of symptoms severity on infected roots, and screening assays for breeding programs. However, a detailed molecular view on the early interaction between <it>M. cannonballus</it> and melon roots in either susceptible or resistant genotypes is lacking. In the present study, we used a melon oligo-based microarray to investigate the gene expression responses of two melon genotypes, <it>Cucumis melo</it> ‘Piel de sapo’ (‘PS’) and <it>C. melo</it> ‘Pat 81’, with contrasting resistance to the disease. This study was carried out at 1 and 3 days after infection (DPI) by <it>M. cannonballus</it>.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Our results indicate a dissimilar behavior of the susceptible <it>vs.</it> the resistant genotypes from 1 to 3 DPI. ‘PS’ responded with a more rapid infection response than ‘Pat 81’ at 1 DPI. At 3 DPI the total number of differentially expressed genes identified in ‘PS’ declined from 451 to 359, while the total number of differentially expressed transcripts in ‘Pat 81’ increased from 187 to 849. Several deregulated transcripts coded for components of Ca<sup>2+</sup> and jasmonic acid (JA) signalling pathways, as well as for other proteins related to defence mechanisms. Transcriptional differences in the activation of the JA-mediated response in ‘Pat 81’ compared to ‘PS’ suggested that JA response might be partially responsible for their observed differences in resistance.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>As a result of this study we have identified for the first time a set of candidate genes involved in the root response to the infection of the pathogen causing melon vine decline. This information is useful for understanding the disease progression and resistance mechanisms few days after inoculation.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2164/13/601
work_keys_str_mv AT roigcristina roottranscriptionalresponsesoftwomelongenotypeswithcontrastingresistancetoitmonosporascuscannonballusitpollackitetitueckerinfection
AT fitaana roottranscriptionalresponsesoftwomelongenotypeswithcontrastingresistancetoitmonosporascuscannonballusitpollackitetitueckerinfection
AT riosgabino roottranscriptionalresponsesoftwomelongenotypeswithcontrastingresistancetoitmonosporascuscannonballusitpollackitetitueckerinfection
AT hammondjohnp roottranscriptionalresponsesoftwomelongenotypeswithcontrastingresistancetoitmonosporascuscannonballusitpollackitetitueckerinfection
AT nuezfernando roottranscriptionalresponsesoftwomelongenotypeswithcontrastingresistancetoitmonosporascuscannonballusitpollackitetitueckerinfection
AT picobelen roottranscriptionalresponsesoftwomelongenotypeswithcontrastingresistancetoitmonosporascuscannonballusitpollackitetitueckerinfection
_version_ 1725299004643737600