A Performance Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms for Arced Labyrinth Spillways

Labyrinth weirs provide an economic option for flow control structures in a variety of applications, including as spillways at dams. The cycles of labyrinth weirs are typically placed in a linear configuration. However, numerous projects place labyrinth cycles along an arc to take advantage of reser...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fernando Salazar, Brian M. Crookston
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-03-01
Series:Water
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/11/3/544
id doaj-c346764351b34a2bb818c186e63996e2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c346764351b34a2bb818c186e63996e22020-11-25T02:56:37ZengMDPI AGWater2073-44412019-03-0111354410.3390/w11030544w11030544A Performance Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms for Arced Labyrinth SpillwaysFernando Salazar0Brian M. Crookston1International Centre for Numerical Methods in Engineering (CIMNE), Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, 08034 Barcelona, SpainDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Utah Water Research Laboratory, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84321, USALabyrinth weirs provide an economic option for flow control structures in a variety of applications, including as spillways at dams. The cycles of labyrinth weirs are typically placed in a linear configuration. However, numerous projects place labyrinth cycles along an arc to take advantage of reservoir conditions and dam alignment, and to reduce construction costs such as narrowing the spillway chute. Practitioners must optimize more than 10 geometric variables when developing a head–discharge relationship. This is typically done using the following tools: empirical relationships, numerical modeling, and physical modeling. This study applied a new tool, machine learning, to the analysis of the geometrically complex arced labyrinth weirs. In this work, both neural networks (NN) and random forests (RF) were employed to estimate the discharge coefficient for this specific type of weir with the results of physical modeling experiments used for training. Machine learning results are critiqued in terms of accuracy, robustness, interpolation, applicability, and new insights into the hydraulic performance of arced labyrinth weirs. Results demonstrate that NN and RF algorithms can be used as a unique expression for curve fitting, although neural networks outperformed random forest when interpolating among the tested geometries.http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/11/3/544arced labyrinth weirspillway discharge capacitymachine learningrandom forests modelneural networks
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Fernando Salazar
Brian M. Crookston
spellingShingle Fernando Salazar
Brian M. Crookston
A Performance Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms for Arced Labyrinth Spillways
Water
arced labyrinth weir
spillway discharge capacity
machine learning
random forests model
neural networks
author_facet Fernando Salazar
Brian M. Crookston
author_sort Fernando Salazar
title A Performance Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms for Arced Labyrinth Spillways
title_short A Performance Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms for Arced Labyrinth Spillways
title_full A Performance Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms for Arced Labyrinth Spillways
title_fullStr A Performance Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms for Arced Labyrinth Spillways
title_full_unstemmed A Performance Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms for Arced Labyrinth Spillways
title_sort performance comparison of machine learning algorithms for arced labyrinth spillways
publisher MDPI AG
series Water
issn 2073-4441
publishDate 2019-03-01
description Labyrinth weirs provide an economic option for flow control structures in a variety of applications, including as spillways at dams. The cycles of labyrinth weirs are typically placed in a linear configuration. However, numerous projects place labyrinth cycles along an arc to take advantage of reservoir conditions and dam alignment, and to reduce construction costs such as narrowing the spillway chute. Practitioners must optimize more than 10 geometric variables when developing a head–discharge relationship. This is typically done using the following tools: empirical relationships, numerical modeling, and physical modeling. This study applied a new tool, machine learning, to the analysis of the geometrically complex arced labyrinth weirs. In this work, both neural networks (NN) and random forests (RF) were employed to estimate the discharge coefficient for this specific type of weir with the results of physical modeling experiments used for training. Machine learning results are critiqued in terms of accuracy, robustness, interpolation, applicability, and new insights into the hydraulic performance of arced labyrinth weirs. Results demonstrate that NN and RF algorithms can be used as a unique expression for curve fitting, although neural networks outperformed random forest when interpolating among the tested geometries.
topic arced labyrinth weir
spillway discharge capacity
machine learning
random forests model
neural networks
url http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/11/3/544
work_keys_str_mv AT fernandosalazar aperformancecomparisonofmachinelearningalgorithmsforarcedlabyrinthspillways
AT brianmcrookston aperformancecomparisonofmachinelearningalgorithmsforarcedlabyrinthspillways
AT fernandosalazar performancecomparisonofmachinelearningalgorithmsforarcedlabyrinthspillways
AT brianmcrookston performancecomparisonofmachinelearningalgorithmsforarcedlabyrinthspillways
_version_ 1724713080032591872