Dating of Pregnancy in First versus Second Trimester in Relation to Post-Term Birth Rate: A Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVES:To evaluate in a national standardised setting whether the performance of ultrasound dating during the first rather than the second trimester of pregnancy had consequences regarding the definition of pre- and post-term birth rates. METHODS:A cohort study of 8,551 singleton pregnancies wit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ida Näslund Thagaard, Lone Krebs, Ulrik Lausten-Thomsen, Severin Olesen Larsen, Jens-Christian Holm, Michael Christiansen, Torben Larsen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2016-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4711898?pdf=render
id doaj-c35749ee0a034a1184d94705c8b18e2f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c35749ee0a034a1184d94705c8b18e2f2020-11-25T01:19:50ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032016-01-01111e014710910.1371/journal.pone.0147109Dating of Pregnancy in First versus Second Trimester in Relation to Post-Term Birth Rate: A Cohort Study.Ida Näslund ThagaardLone KrebsUlrik Lausten-ThomsenSeverin Olesen LarsenJens-Christian HolmMichael ChristiansenTorben LarsenOBJECTIVES:To evaluate in a national standardised setting whether the performance of ultrasound dating during the first rather than the second trimester of pregnancy had consequences regarding the definition of pre- and post-term birth rates. METHODS:A cohort study of 8,551 singleton pregnancies with spontaneous delivery was performed from 2006 to 2012 at Copenhagen University Hospital, Holbæk, Denmark. We determined the duration of pregnancy calculated by last menstrual period, crown rump length (CRL), biparietal diameter (1st trimester), BPD (2nd trimester), and head circumference and compared mean and median durations, the mean differences, the systematic discrepancies, and the percentages of pre-term and post-term pregnancies in relation to each method. The primary outcomes were post-term and pre-term birth rates defined by different dating methods. RESULTS:The change from use of second to first trimester measurements for dating was associated with a significant increase in the rate of post-term deliveries from 2.1-2.9% and a significant decrease in the rate of pre-term deliveries from 5.4-4.6% caused by systematic discrepancies. Thereby 25.1% would pass 41 weeks when GA is defined by CRL and 17.3% when BPD (2nd trimester) is used. Calibration for these discrepancies resulted in a lower post-term birth rate, from 3.1-1.4%, when first compared to second trimester dating was used. CONCLUSIONS:Systematic discrepancies were identified when biometric formulas were used to determine duration of pregnancy. This should be corrected in clinical practice to avoid an overestimation of post-term birth and unnecessary inductions when first trimester formulas are used.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4711898?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ida Näslund Thagaard
Lone Krebs
Ulrik Lausten-Thomsen
Severin Olesen Larsen
Jens-Christian Holm
Michael Christiansen
Torben Larsen
spellingShingle Ida Näslund Thagaard
Lone Krebs
Ulrik Lausten-Thomsen
Severin Olesen Larsen
Jens-Christian Holm
Michael Christiansen
Torben Larsen
Dating of Pregnancy in First versus Second Trimester in Relation to Post-Term Birth Rate: A Cohort Study.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Ida Näslund Thagaard
Lone Krebs
Ulrik Lausten-Thomsen
Severin Olesen Larsen
Jens-Christian Holm
Michael Christiansen
Torben Larsen
author_sort Ida Näslund Thagaard
title Dating of Pregnancy in First versus Second Trimester in Relation to Post-Term Birth Rate: A Cohort Study.
title_short Dating of Pregnancy in First versus Second Trimester in Relation to Post-Term Birth Rate: A Cohort Study.
title_full Dating of Pregnancy in First versus Second Trimester in Relation to Post-Term Birth Rate: A Cohort Study.
title_fullStr Dating of Pregnancy in First versus Second Trimester in Relation to Post-Term Birth Rate: A Cohort Study.
title_full_unstemmed Dating of Pregnancy in First versus Second Trimester in Relation to Post-Term Birth Rate: A Cohort Study.
title_sort dating of pregnancy in first versus second trimester in relation to post-term birth rate: a cohort study.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2016-01-01
description OBJECTIVES:To evaluate in a national standardised setting whether the performance of ultrasound dating during the first rather than the second trimester of pregnancy had consequences regarding the definition of pre- and post-term birth rates. METHODS:A cohort study of 8,551 singleton pregnancies with spontaneous delivery was performed from 2006 to 2012 at Copenhagen University Hospital, Holbæk, Denmark. We determined the duration of pregnancy calculated by last menstrual period, crown rump length (CRL), biparietal diameter (1st trimester), BPD (2nd trimester), and head circumference and compared mean and median durations, the mean differences, the systematic discrepancies, and the percentages of pre-term and post-term pregnancies in relation to each method. The primary outcomes were post-term and pre-term birth rates defined by different dating methods. RESULTS:The change from use of second to first trimester measurements for dating was associated with a significant increase in the rate of post-term deliveries from 2.1-2.9% and a significant decrease in the rate of pre-term deliveries from 5.4-4.6% caused by systematic discrepancies. Thereby 25.1% would pass 41 weeks when GA is defined by CRL and 17.3% when BPD (2nd trimester) is used. Calibration for these discrepancies resulted in a lower post-term birth rate, from 3.1-1.4%, when first compared to second trimester dating was used. CONCLUSIONS:Systematic discrepancies were identified when biometric formulas were used to determine duration of pregnancy. This should be corrected in clinical practice to avoid an overestimation of post-term birth and unnecessary inductions when first trimester formulas are used.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4711898?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT idanaslundthagaard datingofpregnancyinfirstversussecondtrimesterinrelationtoposttermbirthrateacohortstudy
AT lonekrebs datingofpregnancyinfirstversussecondtrimesterinrelationtoposttermbirthrateacohortstudy
AT ulriklaustenthomsen datingofpregnancyinfirstversussecondtrimesterinrelationtoposttermbirthrateacohortstudy
AT severinolesenlarsen datingofpregnancyinfirstversussecondtrimesterinrelationtoposttermbirthrateacohortstudy
AT jenschristianholm datingofpregnancyinfirstversussecondtrimesterinrelationtoposttermbirthrateacohortstudy
AT michaelchristiansen datingofpregnancyinfirstversussecondtrimesterinrelationtoposttermbirthrateacohortstudy
AT torbenlarsen datingofpregnancyinfirstversussecondtrimesterinrelationtoposttermbirthrateacohortstudy
_version_ 1725137093073567744