Diagnostic utility of corneal confocal microscopy and intra-epidermal nerve fibre density in diabetic neuropathy.

Corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) is a rapid, non-invasive, reproducible technique that quantifies small nerve fibres. We have compared the diagnostic capability of CCM against a range of established measures of nerve damage in patients with diabetic neuropathy.In this cross sectional study, thirty...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Uazman Alam, Maria Jeziorska, Ioannis N Petropoulos, Omar Asghar, Hassan Fadavi, Georgios Ponirakis, Andrew Marshall, Mitra Tavakoli, Andrew J M Boulton, Nathan Efron, Rayaz A Malik
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2017-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5515394?pdf=render
id doaj-c365897eddb74fa7ae16ebff3d0cb1d1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c365897eddb74fa7ae16ebff3d0cb1d12020-11-25T02:41:26ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032017-01-01127e018017510.1371/journal.pone.0180175Diagnostic utility of corneal confocal microscopy and intra-epidermal nerve fibre density in diabetic neuropathy.Uazman AlamMaria JeziorskaIoannis N PetropoulosOmar AsgharHassan FadaviGeorgios PonirakisAndrew MarshallMitra TavakoliAndrew J M BoultonNathan EfronRayaz A MalikCorneal confocal microscopy (CCM) is a rapid, non-invasive, reproducible technique that quantifies small nerve fibres. We have compared the diagnostic capability of CCM against a range of established measures of nerve damage in patients with diabetic neuropathy.In this cross sectional study, thirty subjects with Type 1 diabetes without neuropathy (T1DM), thirty one T1DM subjects with neuropathy (DSPN) and twenty seven non-diabetic healthy control subjects underwent detailed assessment of neuropathic symptoms and neurologic deficits, quantitative sensory testing (QST), electrophysiology, skin biopsy and corneal confocal microscopy (CCM).Subjects with DSPN were older (C vs T1DM vs DSPN: 41.0±14.9 vs 38.8±12.5 vs 53.3±11.9, P = 0.0002), had a longer duration of diabetes (P<0.0001), lower eGFR (P = 0.006) and higher albumin-creatinine ratio (P = 0.03) with no significant difference for HbA1c, BMI, lipids and blood pressure. Patients with DSPN were representative of subjects with diabetic neuropathy with clinical signs and symptoms of neuropathy and greater neuropathy deficits quantified by QST, electrophysiology, intra-epidermal nerve fibre density and CCM. Corneal nerve fibre density (CNFD) (Spearman's Rho = 0.60 P<0.0001) and IENFD (Spearman's Rho = 0.56 P<0.0001) were comparable when correlated with peroneal nerve conduction velocity. For the diagnosis of diabetic neuropathy the sensitivity for CNFD was 0.77 and specificity was 0.79 with an area under the ROC curve of 0.81. IENFD had a diagnostic sensitivity of 0.61, specificity of 0.80 and area under the ROC curve of 0.73.CCM is a valid accurate non-invasive method to identify small nerve fibre pathology and is able to diagnose DPN.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5515394?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Uazman Alam
Maria Jeziorska
Ioannis N Petropoulos
Omar Asghar
Hassan Fadavi
Georgios Ponirakis
Andrew Marshall
Mitra Tavakoli
Andrew J M Boulton
Nathan Efron
Rayaz A Malik
spellingShingle Uazman Alam
Maria Jeziorska
Ioannis N Petropoulos
Omar Asghar
Hassan Fadavi
Georgios Ponirakis
Andrew Marshall
Mitra Tavakoli
Andrew J M Boulton
Nathan Efron
Rayaz A Malik
Diagnostic utility of corneal confocal microscopy and intra-epidermal nerve fibre density in diabetic neuropathy.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Uazman Alam
Maria Jeziorska
Ioannis N Petropoulos
Omar Asghar
Hassan Fadavi
Georgios Ponirakis
Andrew Marshall
Mitra Tavakoli
Andrew J M Boulton
Nathan Efron
Rayaz A Malik
author_sort Uazman Alam
title Diagnostic utility of corneal confocal microscopy and intra-epidermal nerve fibre density in diabetic neuropathy.
title_short Diagnostic utility of corneal confocal microscopy and intra-epidermal nerve fibre density in diabetic neuropathy.
title_full Diagnostic utility of corneal confocal microscopy and intra-epidermal nerve fibre density in diabetic neuropathy.
title_fullStr Diagnostic utility of corneal confocal microscopy and intra-epidermal nerve fibre density in diabetic neuropathy.
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic utility of corneal confocal microscopy and intra-epidermal nerve fibre density in diabetic neuropathy.
title_sort diagnostic utility of corneal confocal microscopy and intra-epidermal nerve fibre density in diabetic neuropathy.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2017-01-01
description Corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) is a rapid, non-invasive, reproducible technique that quantifies small nerve fibres. We have compared the diagnostic capability of CCM against a range of established measures of nerve damage in patients with diabetic neuropathy.In this cross sectional study, thirty subjects with Type 1 diabetes without neuropathy (T1DM), thirty one T1DM subjects with neuropathy (DSPN) and twenty seven non-diabetic healthy control subjects underwent detailed assessment of neuropathic symptoms and neurologic deficits, quantitative sensory testing (QST), electrophysiology, skin biopsy and corneal confocal microscopy (CCM).Subjects with DSPN were older (C vs T1DM vs DSPN: 41.0±14.9 vs 38.8±12.5 vs 53.3±11.9, P = 0.0002), had a longer duration of diabetes (P<0.0001), lower eGFR (P = 0.006) and higher albumin-creatinine ratio (P = 0.03) with no significant difference for HbA1c, BMI, lipids and blood pressure. Patients with DSPN were representative of subjects with diabetic neuropathy with clinical signs and symptoms of neuropathy and greater neuropathy deficits quantified by QST, electrophysiology, intra-epidermal nerve fibre density and CCM. Corneal nerve fibre density (CNFD) (Spearman's Rho = 0.60 P<0.0001) and IENFD (Spearman's Rho = 0.56 P<0.0001) were comparable when correlated with peroneal nerve conduction velocity. For the diagnosis of diabetic neuropathy the sensitivity for CNFD was 0.77 and specificity was 0.79 with an area under the ROC curve of 0.81. IENFD had a diagnostic sensitivity of 0.61, specificity of 0.80 and area under the ROC curve of 0.73.CCM is a valid accurate non-invasive method to identify small nerve fibre pathology and is able to diagnose DPN.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5515394?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT uazmanalam diagnosticutilityofcornealconfocalmicroscopyandintraepidermalnervefibredensityindiabeticneuropathy
AT mariajeziorska diagnosticutilityofcornealconfocalmicroscopyandintraepidermalnervefibredensityindiabeticneuropathy
AT ioannisnpetropoulos diagnosticutilityofcornealconfocalmicroscopyandintraepidermalnervefibredensityindiabeticneuropathy
AT omarasghar diagnosticutilityofcornealconfocalmicroscopyandintraepidermalnervefibredensityindiabeticneuropathy
AT hassanfadavi diagnosticutilityofcornealconfocalmicroscopyandintraepidermalnervefibredensityindiabeticneuropathy
AT georgiosponirakis diagnosticutilityofcornealconfocalmicroscopyandintraepidermalnervefibredensityindiabeticneuropathy
AT andrewmarshall diagnosticutilityofcornealconfocalmicroscopyandintraepidermalnervefibredensityindiabeticneuropathy
AT mitratavakoli diagnosticutilityofcornealconfocalmicroscopyandintraepidermalnervefibredensityindiabeticneuropathy
AT andrewjmboulton diagnosticutilityofcornealconfocalmicroscopyandintraepidermalnervefibredensityindiabeticneuropathy
AT nathanefron diagnosticutilityofcornealconfocalmicroscopyandintraepidermalnervefibredensityindiabeticneuropathy
AT rayazamalik diagnosticutilityofcornealconfocalmicroscopyandintraepidermalnervefibredensityindiabeticneuropathy
_version_ 1724778446470512640