The infant mummy’s face—Paleoradiological investigation and comparison between facial reconstruction and mummy portrait of a Roman-period Egyptian child

In Graeco-Roman times in the Lower-Egyptian Fayoum region, a painted portrait was traditionally placed over the face of a deceased individual. These mummy portraits show considerable inter-individual diversity. This suggests that those portraits were created separately for each individual. In the pr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andreas G. Nerlich, Lukas Fischer, Stephanie Panzer, Roxane Bicker, Thomas Helmberger, Sylvia Schoske, David Caramelli
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2020-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7494087/?tool=EBI
id doaj-c3803b68f8ba4dcb980c8f51e8d7029b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c3803b68f8ba4dcb980c8f51e8d7029b2020-11-25T02:46:39ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-01159The infant mummy’s face—Paleoradiological investigation and comparison between facial reconstruction and mummy portrait of a Roman-period Egyptian childAndreas G. NerlichLukas FischerStephanie PanzerRoxane BickerThomas HelmbergerSylvia SchoskeDavid CaramelliIn Graeco-Roman times in the Lower-Egyptian Fayoum region, a painted portrait was traditionally placed over the face of a deceased individual. These mummy portraits show considerable inter-individual diversity. This suggests that those portraits were created separately for each individual. In the present study, we investigated a completely wrapped young infant mummy with a typical mummy portrait by whole body CT analysis. This was used to obtain physical information on the infant and provided the basis for a virtual face reconstruction in order to compare it to the mummy portrait. We identified the mummy as a 3–4 years old male infant that had been prepared according to the typical ancient Egyptian mummification rites. It most probably suffered from a right-sided pulmonary infection which may also be the cause of death. The reconstructed face showed considerable similarities to the portrait, confirming the portrait’s specificity to this individual. However, there are some differences between portrait and face. The portrait seems to show a slightly older individual which may be due to artistic conventions of that period.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7494087/?tool=EBI
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Andreas G. Nerlich
Lukas Fischer
Stephanie Panzer
Roxane Bicker
Thomas Helmberger
Sylvia Schoske
David Caramelli
spellingShingle Andreas G. Nerlich
Lukas Fischer
Stephanie Panzer
Roxane Bicker
Thomas Helmberger
Sylvia Schoske
David Caramelli
The infant mummy’s face—Paleoradiological investigation and comparison between facial reconstruction and mummy portrait of a Roman-period Egyptian child
PLoS ONE
author_facet Andreas G. Nerlich
Lukas Fischer
Stephanie Panzer
Roxane Bicker
Thomas Helmberger
Sylvia Schoske
David Caramelli
author_sort Andreas G. Nerlich
title The infant mummy’s face—Paleoradiological investigation and comparison between facial reconstruction and mummy portrait of a Roman-period Egyptian child
title_short The infant mummy’s face—Paleoradiological investigation and comparison between facial reconstruction and mummy portrait of a Roman-period Egyptian child
title_full The infant mummy’s face—Paleoradiological investigation and comparison between facial reconstruction and mummy portrait of a Roman-period Egyptian child
title_fullStr The infant mummy’s face—Paleoradiological investigation and comparison between facial reconstruction and mummy portrait of a Roman-period Egyptian child
title_full_unstemmed The infant mummy’s face—Paleoradiological investigation and comparison between facial reconstruction and mummy portrait of a Roman-period Egyptian child
title_sort infant mummy’s face—paleoradiological investigation and comparison between facial reconstruction and mummy portrait of a roman-period egyptian child
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2020-01-01
description In Graeco-Roman times in the Lower-Egyptian Fayoum region, a painted portrait was traditionally placed over the face of a deceased individual. These mummy portraits show considerable inter-individual diversity. This suggests that those portraits were created separately for each individual. In the present study, we investigated a completely wrapped young infant mummy with a typical mummy portrait by whole body CT analysis. This was used to obtain physical information on the infant and provided the basis for a virtual face reconstruction in order to compare it to the mummy portrait. We identified the mummy as a 3–4 years old male infant that had been prepared according to the typical ancient Egyptian mummification rites. It most probably suffered from a right-sided pulmonary infection which may also be the cause of death. The reconstructed face showed considerable similarities to the portrait, confirming the portrait’s specificity to this individual. However, there are some differences between portrait and face. The portrait seems to show a slightly older individual which may be due to artistic conventions of that period.
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7494087/?tool=EBI
work_keys_str_mv AT andreasgnerlich theinfantmummysfacepaleoradiologicalinvestigationandcomparisonbetweenfacialreconstructionandmummyportraitofaromanperiodegyptianchild
AT lukasfischer theinfantmummysfacepaleoradiologicalinvestigationandcomparisonbetweenfacialreconstructionandmummyportraitofaromanperiodegyptianchild
AT stephaniepanzer theinfantmummysfacepaleoradiologicalinvestigationandcomparisonbetweenfacialreconstructionandmummyportraitofaromanperiodegyptianchild
AT roxanebicker theinfantmummysfacepaleoradiologicalinvestigationandcomparisonbetweenfacialreconstructionandmummyportraitofaromanperiodegyptianchild
AT thomashelmberger theinfantmummysfacepaleoradiologicalinvestigationandcomparisonbetweenfacialreconstructionandmummyportraitofaromanperiodegyptianchild
AT sylviaschoske theinfantmummysfacepaleoradiologicalinvestigationandcomparisonbetweenfacialreconstructionandmummyportraitofaromanperiodegyptianchild
AT davidcaramelli theinfantmummysfacepaleoradiologicalinvestigationandcomparisonbetweenfacialreconstructionandmummyportraitofaromanperiodegyptianchild
AT andreasgnerlich infantmummysfacepaleoradiologicalinvestigationandcomparisonbetweenfacialreconstructionandmummyportraitofaromanperiodegyptianchild
AT lukasfischer infantmummysfacepaleoradiologicalinvestigationandcomparisonbetweenfacialreconstructionandmummyportraitofaromanperiodegyptianchild
AT stephaniepanzer infantmummysfacepaleoradiologicalinvestigationandcomparisonbetweenfacialreconstructionandmummyportraitofaromanperiodegyptianchild
AT roxanebicker infantmummysfacepaleoradiologicalinvestigationandcomparisonbetweenfacialreconstructionandmummyportraitofaromanperiodegyptianchild
AT thomashelmberger infantmummysfacepaleoradiologicalinvestigationandcomparisonbetweenfacialreconstructionandmummyportraitofaromanperiodegyptianchild
AT sylviaschoske infantmummysfacepaleoradiologicalinvestigationandcomparisonbetweenfacialreconstructionandmummyportraitofaromanperiodegyptianchild
AT davidcaramelli infantmummysfacepaleoradiologicalinvestigationandcomparisonbetweenfacialreconstructionandmummyportraitofaromanperiodegyptianchild
_version_ 1724756873360441344