The infant mummy’s face—Paleoradiological investigation and comparison between facial reconstruction and mummy portrait of a Roman-period Egyptian child
In Graeco-Roman times in the Lower-Egyptian Fayoum region, a painted portrait was traditionally placed over the face of a deceased individual. These mummy portraits show considerable inter-individual diversity. This suggests that those portraits were created separately for each individual. In the pr...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2020-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7494087/?tool=EBI |
id |
doaj-c3803b68f8ba4dcb980c8f51e8d7029b |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-c3803b68f8ba4dcb980c8f51e8d7029b2020-11-25T02:46:39ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-01159The infant mummy’s face—Paleoradiological investigation and comparison between facial reconstruction and mummy portrait of a Roman-period Egyptian childAndreas G. NerlichLukas FischerStephanie PanzerRoxane BickerThomas HelmbergerSylvia SchoskeDavid CaramelliIn Graeco-Roman times in the Lower-Egyptian Fayoum region, a painted portrait was traditionally placed over the face of a deceased individual. These mummy portraits show considerable inter-individual diversity. This suggests that those portraits were created separately for each individual. In the present study, we investigated a completely wrapped young infant mummy with a typical mummy portrait by whole body CT analysis. This was used to obtain physical information on the infant and provided the basis for a virtual face reconstruction in order to compare it to the mummy portrait. We identified the mummy as a 3–4 years old male infant that had been prepared according to the typical ancient Egyptian mummification rites. It most probably suffered from a right-sided pulmonary infection which may also be the cause of death. The reconstructed face showed considerable similarities to the portrait, confirming the portrait’s specificity to this individual. However, there are some differences between portrait and face. The portrait seems to show a slightly older individual which may be due to artistic conventions of that period.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7494087/?tool=EBI |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Andreas G. Nerlich Lukas Fischer Stephanie Panzer Roxane Bicker Thomas Helmberger Sylvia Schoske David Caramelli |
spellingShingle |
Andreas G. Nerlich Lukas Fischer Stephanie Panzer Roxane Bicker Thomas Helmberger Sylvia Schoske David Caramelli The infant mummy’s face—Paleoradiological investigation and comparison between facial reconstruction and mummy portrait of a Roman-period Egyptian child PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Andreas G. Nerlich Lukas Fischer Stephanie Panzer Roxane Bicker Thomas Helmberger Sylvia Schoske David Caramelli |
author_sort |
Andreas G. Nerlich |
title |
The infant mummy’s face—Paleoradiological investigation and comparison between facial reconstruction and mummy portrait of a Roman-period Egyptian child |
title_short |
The infant mummy’s face—Paleoradiological investigation and comparison between facial reconstruction and mummy portrait of a Roman-period Egyptian child |
title_full |
The infant mummy’s face—Paleoradiological investigation and comparison between facial reconstruction and mummy portrait of a Roman-period Egyptian child |
title_fullStr |
The infant mummy’s face—Paleoradiological investigation and comparison between facial reconstruction and mummy portrait of a Roman-period Egyptian child |
title_full_unstemmed |
The infant mummy’s face—Paleoradiological investigation and comparison between facial reconstruction and mummy portrait of a Roman-period Egyptian child |
title_sort |
infant mummy’s face—paleoradiological investigation and comparison between facial reconstruction and mummy portrait of a roman-period egyptian child |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2020-01-01 |
description |
In Graeco-Roman times in the Lower-Egyptian Fayoum region, a painted portrait was traditionally placed over the face of a deceased individual. These mummy portraits show considerable inter-individual diversity. This suggests that those portraits were created separately for each individual. In the present study, we investigated a completely wrapped young infant mummy with a typical mummy portrait by whole body CT analysis. This was used to obtain physical information on the infant and provided the basis for a virtual face reconstruction in order to compare it to the mummy portrait. We identified the mummy as a 3–4 years old male infant that had been prepared according to the typical ancient Egyptian mummification rites. It most probably suffered from a right-sided pulmonary infection which may also be the cause of death. The reconstructed face showed considerable similarities to the portrait, confirming the portrait’s specificity to this individual. However, there are some differences between portrait and face. The portrait seems to show a slightly older individual which may be due to artistic conventions of that period. |
url |
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7494087/?tool=EBI |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT andreasgnerlich theinfantmummysfacepaleoradiologicalinvestigationandcomparisonbetweenfacialreconstructionandmummyportraitofaromanperiodegyptianchild AT lukasfischer theinfantmummysfacepaleoradiologicalinvestigationandcomparisonbetweenfacialreconstructionandmummyportraitofaromanperiodegyptianchild AT stephaniepanzer theinfantmummysfacepaleoradiologicalinvestigationandcomparisonbetweenfacialreconstructionandmummyportraitofaromanperiodegyptianchild AT roxanebicker theinfantmummysfacepaleoradiologicalinvestigationandcomparisonbetweenfacialreconstructionandmummyportraitofaromanperiodegyptianchild AT thomashelmberger theinfantmummysfacepaleoradiologicalinvestigationandcomparisonbetweenfacialreconstructionandmummyportraitofaromanperiodegyptianchild AT sylviaschoske theinfantmummysfacepaleoradiologicalinvestigationandcomparisonbetweenfacialreconstructionandmummyportraitofaromanperiodegyptianchild AT davidcaramelli theinfantmummysfacepaleoradiologicalinvestigationandcomparisonbetweenfacialreconstructionandmummyportraitofaromanperiodegyptianchild AT andreasgnerlich infantmummysfacepaleoradiologicalinvestigationandcomparisonbetweenfacialreconstructionandmummyportraitofaromanperiodegyptianchild AT lukasfischer infantmummysfacepaleoradiologicalinvestigationandcomparisonbetweenfacialreconstructionandmummyportraitofaromanperiodegyptianchild AT stephaniepanzer infantmummysfacepaleoradiologicalinvestigationandcomparisonbetweenfacialreconstructionandmummyportraitofaromanperiodegyptianchild AT roxanebicker infantmummysfacepaleoradiologicalinvestigationandcomparisonbetweenfacialreconstructionandmummyportraitofaromanperiodegyptianchild AT thomashelmberger infantmummysfacepaleoradiologicalinvestigationandcomparisonbetweenfacialreconstructionandmummyportraitofaromanperiodegyptianchild AT sylviaschoske infantmummysfacepaleoradiologicalinvestigationandcomparisonbetweenfacialreconstructionandmummyportraitofaromanperiodegyptianchild AT davidcaramelli infantmummysfacepaleoradiologicalinvestigationandcomparisonbetweenfacialreconstructionandmummyportraitofaromanperiodegyptianchild |
_version_ |
1724756873360441344 |