Comparison of forced-air and water-circulating warming for prevention of hypothermia during transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) procedures at our institution were complicated by perioperative hypothermia despite use of the standard of care forced-air convective warming device (the BairHugger, Augustine Medical Inc, Eden Prairie, MN, USA). To remedy this problem, we initiated a qu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Benjamin Rohrer, Emily Penick, Farhad Zahedi, Hocine Tighiouart, Brian Kelly, Frederick Cobey, Stefan Ianchulev
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2017-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5456084?pdf=render
id doaj-c3890af7dd824cfe9452ae2162efe97c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c3890af7dd824cfe9452ae2162efe97c2020-11-25T00:08:49ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032017-01-01126e017860010.1371/journal.pone.0178600Comparison of forced-air and water-circulating warming for prevention of hypothermia during transcatheter aortic valve replacement.Benjamin RohrerEmily PenickFarhad ZahediHocine TighiouartBrian KellyFrederick CobeyStefan IanchulevTranscatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) procedures at our institution were complicated by perioperative hypothermia despite use of the standard of care forced-air convective warming device (the BairHugger, Augustine Medical Inc, Eden Prairie, MN, USA). To remedy this problem, we initiated a quality improvement process that investigated the use of a conductive warm water-circulating device (the Allon ThermoWrap, Menen Medical Corporation, Trevose, PA, USA), and hypothesized that it would decrease the incidence of perioperative hypothermia.We compared two different intraoperative warming devices using a historic control. We retrospectively reviewed intraoperative records of 80 TAVRs between 6/2013 and 6/2015, 46 and 34 of which were done with the forced-air and water-circulating devices, respectively. Continuous temperature data obtained from pulmonary artery catheter, temperature upon arrival to cardiothoracic ICU (CTU), age, BSA, height, and BMI were compared.Patients warmed with both devices were similar in terms of demographic characteristics. First recorded intraoperative temperature (mean 36.26 ± SD 0.61 vs. 35.95 ± 0.46°C, p = 0.02), lowest intraoperative temperature (36.01 ± 0.58 vs. 34.89 ± 0.76°C, p<0.001), temperature at the end of the procedure (36.47 ± 0.51 vs. 35.17 ± 0.75°C, p<0.001), and temperature upon arrival to the CTU (36.35 ± 0.44 vs. 35.07 ± 0.78°C, p<0.001) were significantly higher in the water-circulating group as compared to the forced-air group.A quality improvement process led to selection of a new warming device that virtually eliminated perioperative hypothermia at our institution. Patients warmed with the new device were significantly less likely to experience intraoperative hypothermia and were significantly more likely to be normothermic upon arrival to the CTU.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5456084?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Benjamin Rohrer
Emily Penick
Farhad Zahedi
Hocine Tighiouart
Brian Kelly
Frederick Cobey
Stefan Ianchulev
spellingShingle Benjamin Rohrer
Emily Penick
Farhad Zahedi
Hocine Tighiouart
Brian Kelly
Frederick Cobey
Stefan Ianchulev
Comparison of forced-air and water-circulating warming for prevention of hypothermia during transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Benjamin Rohrer
Emily Penick
Farhad Zahedi
Hocine Tighiouart
Brian Kelly
Frederick Cobey
Stefan Ianchulev
author_sort Benjamin Rohrer
title Comparison of forced-air and water-circulating warming for prevention of hypothermia during transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
title_short Comparison of forced-air and water-circulating warming for prevention of hypothermia during transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
title_full Comparison of forced-air and water-circulating warming for prevention of hypothermia during transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
title_fullStr Comparison of forced-air and water-circulating warming for prevention of hypothermia during transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of forced-air and water-circulating warming for prevention of hypothermia during transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
title_sort comparison of forced-air and water-circulating warming for prevention of hypothermia during transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2017-01-01
description Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) procedures at our institution were complicated by perioperative hypothermia despite use of the standard of care forced-air convective warming device (the BairHugger, Augustine Medical Inc, Eden Prairie, MN, USA). To remedy this problem, we initiated a quality improvement process that investigated the use of a conductive warm water-circulating device (the Allon ThermoWrap, Menen Medical Corporation, Trevose, PA, USA), and hypothesized that it would decrease the incidence of perioperative hypothermia.We compared two different intraoperative warming devices using a historic control. We retrospectively reviewed intraoperative records of 80 TAVRs between 6/2013 and 6/2015, 46 and 34 of which were done with the forced-air and water-circulating devices, respectively. Continuous temperature data obtained from pulmonary artery catheter, temperature upon arrival to cardiothoracic ICU (CTU), age, BSA, height, and BMI were compared.Patients warmed with both devices were similar in terms of demographic characteristics. First recorded intraoperative temperature (mean 36.26 ± SD 0.61 vs. 35.95 ± 0.46°C, p = 0.02), lowest intraoperative temperature (36.01 ± 0.58 vs. 34.89 ± 0.76°C, p<0.001), temperature at the end of the procedure (36.47 ± 0.51 vs. 35.17 ± 0.75°C, p<0.001), and temperature upon arrival to the CTU (36.35 ± 0.44 vs. 35.07 ± 0.78°C, p<0.001) were significantly higher in the water-circulating group as compared to the forced-air group.A quality improvement process led to selection of a new warming device that virtually eliminated perioperative hypothermia at our institution. Patients warmed with the new device were significantly less likely to experience intraoperative hypothermia and were significantly more likely to be normothermic upon arrival to the CTU.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5456084?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT benjaminrohrer comparisonofforcedairandwatercirculatingwarmingforpreventionofhypothermiaduringtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement
AT emilypenick comparisonofforcedairandwatercirculatingwarmingforpreventionofhypothermiaduringtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement
AT farhadzahedi comparisonofforcedairandwatercirculatingwarmingforpreventionofhypothermiaduringtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement
AT hocinetighiouart comparisonofforcedairandwatercirculatingwarmingforpreventionofhypothermiaduringtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement
AT briankelly comparisonofforcedairandwatercirculatingwarmingforpreventionofhypothermiaduringtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement
AT frederickcobey comparisonofforcedairandwatercirculatingwarmingforpreventionofhypothermiaduringtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement
AT stefanianchulev comparisonofforcedairandwatercirculatingwarmingforpreventionofhypothermiaduringtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement
_version_ 1725414429868163072