Sartre’s Godless Theology: Dualist Monism and Its Temporal Dimensions

My task in this paper is to study Sartre’s ontology as a godless theology. The urgency of defending freedom and responsibility in the face of determinism called for an overarching first principle, a role that God used to play. I first show why such a principle is important and how Sartre filled the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Liu Renxiang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: De Gruyter 2019-07-01
Series:Open Theology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2019-0017
id doaj-c3c2f6576394423bb259eefb2a1fbf61
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c3c2f6576394423bb259eefb2a1fbf612021-10-02T19:16:07ZengDe GruyterOpen Theology2300-65792019-07-015118219710.1515/opth-2019-0017opth-2019-0017Sartre’s Godless Theology: Dualist Monism and Its Temporal DimensionsLiu Renxiang0McGill University, Montreal, Canada;My task in this paper is to study Sartre’s ontology as a godless theology. The urgency of defending freedom and responsibility in the face of determinism called for an overarching first principle, a role that God used to play. I first show why such a principle is important and how Sartre filled the void that God had left with a solipsist consciousness. Then I characterize Sartre’s ontology of this consciousness as a “dualist monism”, explaining how it supports his radical conception of freedom. Then, by assessing Sartre’s dualist monism through a theological lens, I disclose an inconsistency in his thought concerning the idea that the in-itself is a deterministic plenitude, which presumes a theos different from consciousness and hence threatens monism. Finally I argue that his inconsistency originates from the finitude of Sartre’s first principle and analyze this finitude by examining the modes of temporality it implies. The entire trajectory problematizes the practice of theo-logy, the idea that a theos stands at the origin of the “logic” (organization or intelligibility) of everything such that all must be conceived under the logos of the theos. While Sartre forcefully criticized the theology of the infinite, his was nonetheless a theology of finitude.https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2019-0017jean-paul sartredualist monismgodless theologyfreedomontologyfinitude
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Liu Renxiang
spellingShingle Liu Renxiang
Sartre’s Godless Theology: Dualist Monism and Its Temporal Dimensions
Open Theology
jean-paul sartre
dualist monism
godless theology
freedom
ontology
finitude
author_facet Liu Renxiang
author_sort Liu Renxiang
title Sartre’s Godless Theology: Dualist Monism and Its Temporal Dimensions
title_short Sartre’s Godless Theology: Dualist Monism and Its Temporal Dimensions
title_full Sartre’s Godless Theology: Dualist Monism and Its Temporal Dimensions
title_fullStr Sartre’s Godless Theology: Dualist Monism and Its Temporal Dimensions
title_full_unstemmed Sartre’s Godless Theology: Dualist Monism and Its Temporal Dimensions
title_sort sartre’s godless theology: dualist monism and its temporal dimensions
publisher De Gruyter
series Open Theology
issn 2300-6579
publishDate 2019-07-01
description My task in this paper is to study Sartre’s ontology as a godless theology. The urgency of defending freedom and responsibility in the face of determinism called for an overarching first principle, a role that God used to play. I first show why such a principle is important and how Sartre filled the void that God had left with a solipsist consciousness. Then I characterize Sartre’s ontology of this consciousness as a “dualist monism”, explaining how it supports his radical conception of freedom. Then, by assessing Sartre’s dualist monism through a theological lens, I disclose an inconsistency in his thought concerning the idea that the in-itself is a deterministic plenitude, which presumes a theos different from consciousness and hence threatens monism. Finally I argue that his inconsistency originates from the finitude of Sartre’s first principle and analyze this finitude by examining the modes of temporality it implies. The entire trajectory problematizes the practice of theo-logy, the idea that a theos stands at the origin of the “logic” (organization or intelligibility) of everything such that all must be conceived under the logos of the theos. While Sartre forcefully criticized the theology of the infinite, his was nonetheless a theology of finitude.
topic jean-paul sartre
dualist monism
godless theology
freedom
ontology
finitude
url https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2019-0017
work_keys_str_mv AT liurenxiang sartresgodlesstheologydualistmonismanditstemporaldimensions
_version_ 1716847539382124544