Assessing and Governing Ecosystem Services Trade-Offs in Agrarian Landscapes: The Case of Biogas

This paper develops a method to explore how alternative scenarios of the expansion of maize production for biogas generation affect biodiversity and ecosystem services (ES). Our approach consists of four steps: (i) defining scenario targets and implementation of assumptions; (ii) simulating crop dis...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christian Albert, Johannes Hermes, Felix Neuendorf, Christina von Haaren, Michael Rode
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2016-01-01
Series:Land
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/5/1/1
id doaj-c3d6c80d386d4d738ca54b32dc40ea30
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c3d6c80d386d4d738ca54b32dc40ea302020-11-25T00:19:00ZengMDPI AGLand2073-445X2016-01-0151110.3390/land5010001land5010001Assessing and Governing Ecosystem Services Trade-Offs in Agrarian Landscapes: The Case of BiogasChristian Albert0Johannes Hermes1Felix Neuendorf2Christina von Haaren3Michael Rode4Institute of Environmental Planning, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Herrenhäuser Str. 2, 30419 Hanover, GermanyInstitute of Environmental Planning, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Herrenhäuser Str. 2, 30419 Hanover, GermanyInstitute of Environmental Planning, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Herrenhäuser Str. 2, 30419 Hanover, GermanyInstitute of Environmental Planning, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Herrenhäuser Str. 2, 30419 Hanover, GermanyInstitute of Environmental Planning, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Herrenhäuser Str. 2, 30419 Hanover, GermanyThis paper develops a method to explore how alternative scenarios of the expansion of maize production for biogas generation affect biodiversity and ecosystem services (ES). Our approach consists of four steps: (i) defining scenario targets and implementation of assumptions; (ii) simulating crop distributions across the landscape; (iii) assessing the ES impacts; and (iv) quantifying the impacts for a comparative trade-off analysis. The case study is the region of Hannover, Germany. One scenario assumes an increase of maize production in a little regulated governance system; two others reflect an increase of biogas production with either strict or flexible environmental regulation. We consider biodiversity and three ES: biogas generation, food production and the visual landscape. Our results show that the expansion of maize production results in predominantly negative impacts for other ES. However, positive effects can also be identified, i.e., when the introduction of maize leads to higher local crop diversity and, thus, a more attractive visual landscape. The scenario of little regulation portrays more negative impacts than the other scenarios. Targeted spatial planning, implementation and appropriate governance for steering maize production into less sensitive areas is crucial for minimizing trade-offs and exploiting synergies between bioenergy and other ES.http://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/5/1/1landscape planningecosystem serviceslandscape serviceslandscape functionstrade-offsbiogas
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Christian Albert
Johannes Hermes
Felix Neuendorf
Christina von Haaren
Michael Rode
spellingShingle Christian Albert
Johannes Hermes
Felix Neuendorf
Christina von Haaren
Michael Rode
Assessing and Governing Ecosystem Services Trade-Offs in Agrarian Landscapes: The Case of Biogas
Land
landscape planning
ecosystem services
landscape services
landscape functions
trade-offs
biogas
author_facet Christian Albert
Johannes Hermes
Felix Neuendorf
Christina von Haaren
Michael Rode
author_sort Christian Albert
title Assessing and Governing Ecosystem Services Trade-Offs in Agrarian Landscapes: The Case of Biogas
title_short Assessing and Governing Ecosystem Services Trade-Offs in Agrarian Landscapes: The Case of Biogas
title_full Assessing and Governing Ecosystem Services Trade-Offs in Agrarian Landscapes: The Case of Biogas
title_fullStr Assessing and Governing Ecosystem Services Trade-Offs in Agrarian Landscapes: The Case of Biogas
title_full_unstemmed Assessing and Governing Ecosystem Services Trade-Offs in Agrarian Landscapes: The Case of Biogas
title_sort assessing and governing ecosystem services trade-offs in agrarian landscapes: the case of biogas
publisher MDPI AG
series Land
issn 2073-445X
publishDate 2016-01-01
description This paper develops a method to explore how alternative scenarios of the expansion of maize production for biogas generation affect biodiversity and ecosystem services (ES). Our approach consists of four steps: (i) defining scenario targets and implementation of assumptions; (ii) simulating crop distributions across the landscape; (iii) assessing the ES impacts; and (iv) quantifying the impacts for a comparative trade-off analysis. The case study is the region of Hannover, Germany. One scenario assumes an increase of maize production in a little regulated governance system; two others reflect an increase of biogas production with either strict or flexible environmental regulation. We consider biodiversity and three ES: biogas generation, food production and the visual landscape. Our results show that the expansion of maize production results in predominantly negative impacts for other ES. However, positive effects can also be identified, i.e., when the introduction of maize leads to higher local crop diversity and, thus, a more attractive visual landscape. The scenario of little regulation portrays more negative impacts than the other scenarios. Targeted spatial planning, implementation and appropriate governance for steering maize production into less sensitive areas is crucial for minimizing trade-offs and exploiting synergies between bioenergy and other ES.
topic landscape planning
ecosystem services
landscape services
landscape functions
trade-offs
biogas
url http://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/5/1/1
work_keys_str_mv AT christianalbert assessingandgoverningecosystemservicestradeoffsinagrarianlandscapesthecaseofbiogas
AT johanneshermes assessingandgoverningecosystemservicestradeoffsinagrarianlandscapesthecaseofbiogas
AT felixneuendorf assessingandgoverningecosystemservicestradeoffsinagrarianlandscapesthecaseofbiogas
AT christinavonhaaren assessingandgoverningecosystemservicestradeoffsinagrarianlandscapesthecaseofbiogas
AT michaelrode assessingandgoverningecosystemservicestradeoffsinagrarianlandscapesthecaseofbiogas
_version_ 1725373959483949056