O moralnych obowiązkach ludzi wobec zwierząt. Etyka Gary’ego Francione

The purpose of my article is to present and analyze the ethical views of Gary Francione – the leading, contemporary representative of the Animal Rights Movement. He built his theory by criticizing the views of two other supporters of the idea of animal liberation: Peter Singer and Tom Regan. In his...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Dorota Probucka
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University Press 2015-06-01
Series:Studia Ecologiae et Bioethicae
Subjects:
Online Access:https://czasopisma.uksw.edu.pl/index.php/seb/article/view/6660
id doaj-c4103dd3e54c484aad96e5f5e81aeb02
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c4103dd3e54c484aad96e5f5e81aeb022021-07-02T19:43:04ZengCardinal Stefan Wyszynski University PressStudia Ecologiae et Bioethicae1733-12182015-06-0113210.21697/seb.2015.13.2.05O moralnych obowiązkach ludzi wobec zwierząt. Etyka Gary’ego FrancioneDorota Probucka0Uniwersytet Pedagogiczny im. KEN w Krakowie, Instytut Filozofii i Socjologii The purpose of my article is to present and analyze the ethical views of Gary Francione – the leading, contemporary representative of the Animal Rights Movement. He built his theory by criticizing the views of two other supporters of the idea of animal liberation: Peter Singer and Tom Regan. In his opinion, neither of these philosophers did not escape from the anthropocentric paradigm binding the moral obligations to animals with the primacy of human interest. Singer believed that only humans have the ability to plan their own future, and only they want to live and extend their own existence. While according to Regan, in conflict situations, respect for human interest should be dominant. Francione agrees that only people understand a deeper meaning of their own existence, but it does not follow that only they want to live and do not want to die. The need to preserve and continue life is not the result of mental states, but it is a consequence of sensitivity – the biological trait which aims to safeguard and continuation of life. According to Francione, if every sensitive creature has an interest in preserving his own life and avoiding suffering it they also have a moral right to life and not being treated in a cruel manner. https://czasopisma.uksw.edu.pl/index.php/seb/article/view/6660Gary Francioneetyka środowiskowaprawa zwierzątsensytywnośćobowiązek moralny
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Dorota Probucka
spellingShingle Dorota Probucka
O moralnych obowiązkach ludzi wobec zwierząt. Etyka Gary’ego Francione
Studia Ecologiae et Bioethicae
Gary Francione
etyka środowiskowa
prawa zwierząt
sensytywność
obowiązek moralny
author_facet Dorota Probucka
author_sort Dorota Probucka
title O moralnych obowiązkach ludzi wobec zwierząt. Etyka Gary’ego Francione
title_short O moralnych obowiązkach ludzi wobec zwierząt. Etyka Gary’ego Francione
title_full O moralnych obowiązkach ludzi wobec zwierząt. Etyka Gary’ego Francione
title_fullStr O moralnych obowiązkach ludzi wobec zwierząt. Etyka Gary’ego Francione
title_full_unstemmed O moralnych obowiązkach ludzi wobec zwierząt. Etyka Gary’ego Francione
title_sort o moralnych obowiązkach ludzi wobec zwierząt. etyka gary’ego francione
publisher Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University Press
series Studia Ecologiae et Bioethicae
issn 1733-1218
publishDate 2015-06-01
description The purpose of my article is to present and analyze the ethical views of Gary Francione – the leading, contemporary representative of the Animal Rights Movement. He built his theory by criticizing the views of two other supporters of the idea of animal liberation: Peter Singer and Tom Regan. In his opinion, neither of these philosophers did not escape from the anthropocentric paradigm binding the moral obligations to animals with the primacy of human interest. Singer believed that only humans have the ability to plan their own future, and only they want to live and extend their own existence. While according to Regan, in conflict situations, respect for human interest should be dominant. Francione agrees that only people understand a deeper meaning of their own existence, but it does not follow that only they want to live and do not want to die. The need to preserve and continue life is not the result of mental states, but it is a consequence of sensitivity – the biological trait which aims to safeguard and continuation of life. According to Francione, if every sensitive creature has an interest in preserving his own life and avoiding suffering it they also have a moral right to life and not being treated in a cruel manner.
topic Gary Francione
etyka środowiskowa
prawa zwierząt
sensytywność
obowiązek moralny
url https://czasopisma.uksw.edu.pl/index.php/seb/article/view/6660
work_keys_str_mv AT dorotaprobucka omoralnychobowiazkachludziwobeczwierzatetykagaryegofrancione
_version_ 1721323611736768512