Reasonable suspicion in reporting child maltreatment: a survey among German healthcare professionals

Abstract Background With regular contacts to the general child population, healthcare professionals could play an important role in the detection of child maltreatment. However, a majority of child maltreatment cases go unnoticed by the healthcare system. Child protection legislations usually offer...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Oliver Berthold, Andreas Jud, Marion Jarczok, Jörg M. Fegert, Vera Clemens
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-06-01
Series:Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-021-00381-7
id doaj-c42bd9dd8cf34e83a24b374aa2736531
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c42bd9dd8cf34e83a24b374aa27365312021-06-20T11:49:59ZengBMCChild and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health1753-20002021-06-011511710.1186/s13034-021-00381-7Reasonable suspicion in reporting child maltreatment: a survey among German healthcare professionalsOliver Berthold0Andreas Jud1Marion Jarczok2Jörg M. Fegert3Vera Clemens4Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry/Psychotherapy, University of UlmDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry/Psychotherapy, University of UlmDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry/Psychotherapy, University of UlmDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry/Psychotherapy, University of UlmDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry/Psychotherapy, University of UlmAbstract Background With regular contacts to the general child population, healthcare professionals could play an important role in the detection of child maltreatment. However, a majority of child maltreatment cases go unnoticed by the healthcare system. Child protection legislations usually offer terms like “reasonable suspicion” to corner a threshold that warrants reporting to child protection services (CPS) is defined as. The indistinct legal terminology leads to marked differences in the interpretation of this threshold. Therefore, we aimed to systematically assess the understanding of reasonable suspicion and subsequent handling of cases in the German context. Methods A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among 2485 physicians and psychotherapists working with children and adolescents. Field access was gained by German professional associations. Via case vignettes, predictors of thresholds for reporting were assessed. Results The probability of a report to CPS increased positively with the degree of suspicion for maltreatment. However, even if participants were certain that child maltreatment occurred, 20% did not chose to report to CPS. Training in child protection lowered the professionals’ threshold for reasonable suspicion; experience with child protection cases and good knowledge of the legal framework increased the likelihood to report an alleged situation of child maltreatment to CPS. Conclusion Our data show that a significant proportion of health care professionals are uncertain about estimating reasonable suspicion and on how to proceed when there are strong indications for child maltreatment Therefore, data point towards the relevance of training in child protection among healthcare professionals in order to improve detection and adequate handling of cases of child maltreatment.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-021-00381-7Child protectionChild maltreatmentReasonable suspicionHealthcare professionalsHealth care systemChild protection system
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Oliver Berthold
Andreas Jud
Marion Jarczok
Jörg M. Fegert
Vera Clemens
spellingShingle Oliver Berthold
Andreas Jud
Marion Jarczok
Jörg M. Fegert
Vera Clemens
Reasonable suspicion in reporting child maltreatment: a survey among German healthcare professionals
Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health
Child protection
Child maltreatment
Reasonable suspicion
Healthcare professionals
Health care system
Child protection system
author_facet Oliver Berthold
Andreas Jud
Marion Jarczok
Jörg M. Fegert
Vera Clemens
author_sort Oliver Berthold
title Reasonable suspicion in reporting child maltreatment: a survey among German healthcare professionals
title_short Reasonable suspicion in reporting child maltreatment: a survey among German healthcare professionals
title_full Reasonable suspicion in reporting child maltreatment: a survey among German healthcare professionals
title_fullStr Reasonable suspicion in reporting child maltreatment: a survey among German healthcare professionals
title_full_unstemmed Reasonable suspicion in reporting child maltreatment: a survey among German healthcare professionals
title_sort reasonable suspicion in reporting child maltreatment: a survey among german healthcare professionals
publisher BMC
series Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health
issn 1753-2000
publishDate 2021-06-01
description Abstract Background With regular contacts to the general child population, healthcare professionals could play an important role in the detection of child maltreatment. However, a majority of child maltreatment cases go unnoticed by the healthcare system. Child protection legislations usually offer terms like “reasonable suspicion” to corner a threshold that warrants reporting to child protection services (CPS) is defined as. The indistinct legal terminology leads to marked differences in the interpretation of this threshold. Therefore, we aimed to systematically assess the understanding of reasonable suspicion and subsequent handling of cases in the German context. Methods A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among 2485 physicians and psychotherapists working with children and adolescents. Field access was gained by German professional associations. Via case vignettes, predictors of thresholds for reporting were assessed. Results The probability of a report to CPS increased positively with the degree of suspicion for maltreatment. However, even if participants were certain that child maltreatment occurred, 20% did not chose to report to CPS. Training in child protection lowered the professionals’ threshold for reasonable suspicion; experience with child protection cases and good knowledge of the legal framework increased the likelihood to report an alleged situation of child maltreatment to CPS. Conclusion Our data show that a significant proportion of health care professionals are uncertain about estimating reasonable suspicion and on how to proceed when there are strong indications for child maltreatment Therefore, data point towards the relevance of training in child protection among healthcare professionals in order to improve detection and adequate handling of cases of child maltreatment.
topic Child protection
Child maltreatment
Reasonable suspicion
Healthcare professionals
Health care system
Child protection system
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-021-00381-7
work_keys_str_mv AT oliverberthold reasonablesuspicioninreportingchildmaltreatmentasurveyamonggermanhealthcareprofessionals
AT andreasjud reasonablesuspicioninreportingchildmaltreatmentasurveyamonggermanhealthcareprofessionals
AT marionjarczok reasonablesuspicioninreportingchildmaltreatmentasurveyamonggermanhealthcareprofessionals
AT jorgmfegert reasonablesuspicioninreportingchildmaltreatmentasurveyamonggermanhealthcareprofessionals
AT veraclemens reasonablesuspicioninreportingchildmaltreatmentasurveyamonggermanhealthcareprofessionals
_version_ 1721369660427862016