The success of using 2% lidocaine in pain removal during extraction of mandibular premolars: a prospective clinical study

Abstract Background The purpose of this study was to evaluate the anesthetic effectiveness of a buccal infiltration technique combined with local massage (using 2% lidocaine) in the extraction of mandibular premolars to be utilized as an alternative to the conventional inferior alveolar nerve block....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Firas A. Jamil, Huda Moutaz Asmael, Mohammed Yahya Al-Jarsha
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-08-01
Series:BMC Oral Health
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12903-020-01228-x
id doaj-c42c5064d8554af0b5ca92ee4159b0b9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c42c5064d8554af0b5ca92ee4159b0b92020-11-25T03:32:25ZengBMCBMC Oral Health1472-68312020-08-012011810.1186/s12903-020-01228-xThe success of using 2% lidocaine in pain removal during extraction of mandibular premolars: a prospective clinical studyFiras A. Jamil0Huda Moutaz Asmael1Mohammed Yahya Al-Jarsha2Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Dental Teaching Hospital, College of Dentistry, University of BaghdadDepartment of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Dental Teaching Hospital, College of Dentistry, University of BaghdadDepartment of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Dental Teaching Hospital, College of Dentistry, University of BaghdadAbstract Background The purpose of this study was to evaluate the anesthetic effectiveness of a buccal infiltration technique combined with local massage (using 2% lidocaine) in the extraction of mandibular premolars to be utilized as an alternative to the conventional inferior alveolar nerve block. Methods Patients eligible included any subject with a clinical indication for tooth extraction of the mandibular 1st or 2nd premolars. All patients were anesthetized buccally by local infiltration technique followed by an external pressure applied for 1 min directly over the injection area. In each case, another local injection was given lingually. All operations were started at approximately 5 min after the buccal injection. The collected data included age, gender, pain perception and its intensity during treatment at three checkpoints, apical tenderness, and the type of extraction. Any associated complications or difficulties were also recorded. Then the results were analyzed and interpreted using appropriate statistical tests. The significance level was set at P ≤ 0.05. Results A total of 247 cases (1st premolar, n = 119; 2nd premolar, n = 128), predominantly male, were included. In 95% of study sample, the patients were satisfied with the dental extraction without any pain. However, in 5% of cases, pain was reported at the stage of tooth removal. Apical tenderness was found to be present in 11% of the total cases. Three teeth required surgical removal. Upon analysis, no significant differences in the success rates were detected between the 2 premolar groups or amongst the various age groups. Minor and transient side effects were reported in this study. Conclusion The technique is simple and effective as well. It might be considered as an alternative anesthetic injection to the inferior alveolar nerve block for dental extraction of the mandibular premolars.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12903-020-01228-xBuccal infiltrationLidocaineArticaine, Mandibular premolarsInferior alveolar nerve block
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Firas A. Jamil
Huda Moutaz Asmael
Mohammed Yahya Al-Jarsha
spellingShingle Firas A. Jamil
Huda Moutaz Asmael
Mohammed Yahya Al-Jarsha
The success of using 2% lidocaine in pain removal during extraction of mandibular premolars: a prospective clinical study
BMC Oral Health
Buccal infiltration
Lidocaine
Articaine, Mandibular premolars
Inferior alveolar nerve block
author_facet Firas A. Jamil
Huda Moutaz Asmael
Mohammed Yahya Al-Jarsha
author_sort Firas A. Jamil
title The success of using 2% lidocaine in pain removal during extraction of mandibular premolars: a prospective clinical study
title_short The success of using 2% lidocaine in pain removal during extraction of mandibular premolars: a prospective clinical study
title_full The success of using 2% lidocaine in pain removal during extraction of mandibular premolars: a prospective clinical study
title_fullStr The success of using 2% lidocaine in pain removal during extraction of mandibular premolars: a prospective clinical study
title_full_unstemmed The success of using 2% lidocaine in pain removal during extraction of mandibular premolars: a prospective clinical study
title_sort success of using 2% lidocaine in pain removal during extraction of mandibular premolars: a prospective clinical study
publisher BMC
series BMC Oral Health
issn 1472-6831
publishDate 2020-08-01
description Abstract Background The purpose of this study was to evaluate the anesthetic effectiveness of a buccal infiltration technique combined with local massage (using 2% lidocaine) in the extraction of mandibular premolars to be utilized as an alternative to the conventional inferior alveolar nerve block. Methods Patients eligible included any subject with a clinical indication for tooth extraction of the mandibular 1st or 2nd premolars. All patients were anesthetized buccally by local infiltration technique followed by an external pressure applied for 1 min directly over the injection area. In each case, another local injection was given lingually. All operations were started at approximately 5 min after the buccal injection. The collected data included age, gender, pain perception and its intensity during treatment at three checkpoints, apical tenderness, and the type of extraction. Any associated complications or difficulties were also recorded. Then the results were analyzed and interpreted using appropriate statistical tests. The significance level was set at P ≤ 0.05. Results A total of 247 cases (1st premolar, n = 119; 2nd premolar, n = 128), predominantly male, were included. In 95% of study sample, the patients were satisfied with the dental extraction without any pain. However, in 5% of cases, pain was reported at the stage of tooth removal. Apical tenderness was found to be present in 11% of the total cases. Three teeth required surgical removal. Upon analysis, no significant differences in the success rates were detected between the 2 premolar groups or amongst the various age groups. Minor and transient side effects were reported in this study. Conclusion The technique is simple and effective as well. It might be considered as an alternative anesthetic injection to the inferior alveolar nerve block for dental extraction of the mandibular premolars.
topic Buccal infiltration
Lidocaine
Articaine, Mandibular premolars
Inferior alveolar nerve block
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12903-020-01228-x
work_keys_str_mv AT firasajamil thesuccessofusing2lidocaineinpainremovalduringextractionofmandibularpremolarsaprospectiveclinicalstudy
AT hudamoutazasmael thesuccessofusing2lidocaineinpainremovalduringextractionofmandibularpremolarsaprospectiveclinicalstudy
AT mohammedyahyaaljarsha thesuccessofusing2lidocaineinpainremovalduringextractionofmandibularpremolarsaprospectiveclinicalstudy
AT firasajamil successofusing2lidocaineinpainremovalduringextractionofmandibularpremolarsaprospectiveclinicalstudy
AT hudamoutazasmael successofusing2lidocaineinpainremovalduringextractionofmandibularpremolarsaprospectiveclinicalstudy
AT mohammedyahyaaljarsha successofusing2lidocaineinpainremovalduringextractionofmandibularpremolarsaprospectiveclinicalstudy
_version_ 1724568469679112192