The success of using 2% lidocaine in pain removal during extraction of mandibular premolars: a prospective clinical study
Abstract Background The purpose of this study was to evaluate the anesthetic effectiveness of a buccal infiltration technique combined with local massage (using 2% lidocaine) in the extraction of mandibular premolars to be utilized as an alternative to the conventional inferior alveolar nerve block....
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2020-08-01
|
Series: | BMC Oral Health |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12903-020-01228-x |
id |
doaj-c42c5064d8554af0b5ca92ee4159b0b9 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-c42c5064d8554af0b5ca92ee4159b0b92020-11-25T03:32:25ZengBMCBMC Oral Health1472-68312020-08-012011810.1186/s12903-020-01228-xThe success of using 2% lidocaine in pain removal during extraction of mandibular premolars: a prospective clinical studyFiras A. Jamil0Huda Moutaz Asmael1Mohammed Yahya Al-Jarsha2Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Dental Teaching Hospital, College of Dentistry, University of BaghdadDepartment of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Dental Teaching Hospital, College of Dentistry, University of BaghdadDepartment of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Dental Teaching Hospital, College of Dentistry, University of BaghdadAbstract Background The purpose of this study was to evaluate the anesthetic effectiveness of a buccal infiltration technique combined with local massage (using 2% lidocaine) in the extraction of mandibular premolars to be utilized as an alternative to the conventional inferior alveolar nerve block. Methods Patients eligible included any subject with a clinical indication for tooth extraction of the mandibular 1st or 2nd premolars. All patients were anesthetized buccally by local infiltration technique followed by an external pressure applied for 1 min directly over the injection area. In each case, another local injection was given lingually. All operations were started at approximately 5 min after the buccal injection. The collected data included age, gender, pain perception and its intensity during treatment at three checkpoints, apical tenderness, and the type of extraction. Any associated complications or difficulties were also recorded. Then the results were analyzed and interpreted using appropriate statistical tests. The significance level was set at P ≤ 0.05. Results A total of 247 cases (1st premolar, n = 119; 2nd premolar, n = 128), predominantly male, were included. In 95% of study sample, the patients were satisfied with the dental extraction without any pain. However, in 5% of cases, pain was reported at the stage of tooth removal. Apical tenderness was found to be present in 11% of the total cases. Three teeth required surgical removal. Upon analysis, no significant differences in the success rates were detected between the 2 premolar groups or amongst the various age groups. Minor and transient side effects were reported in this study. Conclusion The technique is simple and effective as well. It might be considered as an alternative anesthetic injection to the inferior alveolar nerve block for dental extraction of the mandibular premolars.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12903-020-01228-xBuccal infiltrationLidocaineArticaine, Mandibular premolarsInferior alveolar nerve block |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Firas A. Jamil Huda Moutaz Asmael Mohammed Yahya Al-Jarsha |
spellingShingle |
Firas A. Jamil Huda Moutaz Asmael Mohammed Yahya Al-Jarsha The success of using 2% lidocaine in pain removal during extraction of mandibular premolars: a prospective clinical study BMC Oral Health Buccal infiltration Lidocaine Articaine, Mandibular premolars Inferior alveolar nerve block |
author_facet |
Firas A. Jamil Huda Moutaz Asmael Mohammed Yahya Al-Jarsha |
author_sort |
Firas A. Jamil |
title |
The success of using 2% lidocaine in pain removal during extraction of mandibular premolars: a prospective clinical study |
title_short |
The success of using 2% lidocaine in pain removal during extraction of mandibular premolars: a prospective clinical study |
title_full |
The success of using 2% lidocaine in pain removal during extraction of mandibular premolars: a prospective clinical study |
title_fullStr |
The success of using 2% lidocaine in pain removal during extraction of mandibular premolars: a prospective clinical study |
title_full_unstemmed |
The success of using 2% lidocaine in pain removal during extraction of mandibular premolars: a prospective clinical study |
title_sort |
success of using 2% lidocaine in pain removal during extraction of mandibular premolars: a prospective clinical study |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Oral Health |
issn |
1472-6831 |
publishDate |
2020-08-01 |
description |
Abstract Background The purpose of this study was to evaluate the anesthetic effectiveness of a buccal infiltration technique combined with local massage (using 2% lidocaine) in the extraction of mandibular premolars to be utilized as an alternative to the conventional inferior alveolar nerve block. Methods Patients eligible included any subject with a clinical indication for tooth extraction of the mandibular 1st or 2nd premolars. All patients were anesthetized buccally by local infiltration technique followed by an external pressure applied for 1 min directly over the injection area. In each case, another local injection was given lingually. All operations were started at approximately 5 min after the buccal injection. The collected data included age, gender, pain perception and its intensity during treatment at three checkpoints, apical tenderness, and the type of extraction. Any associated complications or difficulties were also recorded. Then the results were analyzed and interpreted using appropriate statistical tests. The significance level was set at P ≤ 0.05. Results A total of 247 cases (1st premolar, n = 119; 2nd premolar, n = 128), predominantly male, were included. In 95% of study sample, the patients were satisfied with the dental extraction without any pain. However, in 5% of cases, pain was reported at the stage of tooth removal. Apical tenderness was found to be present in 11% of the total cases. Three teeth required surgical removal. Upon analysis, no significant differences in the success rates were detected between the 2 premolar groups or amongst the various age groups. Minor and transient side effects were reported in this study. Conclusion The technique is simple and effective as well. It might be considered as an alternative anesthetic injection to the inferior alveolar nerve block for dental extraction of the mandibular premolars. |
topic |
Buccal infiltration Lidocaine Articaine, Mandibular premolars Inferior alveolar nerve block |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12903-020-01228-x |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT firasajamil thesuccessofusing2lidocaineinpainremovalduringextractionofmandibularpremolarsaprospectiveclinicalstudy AT hudamoutazasmael thesuccessofusing2lidocaineinpainremovalduringextractionofmandibularpremolarsaprospectiveclinicalstudy AT mohammedyahyaaljarsha thesuccessofusing2lidocaineinpainremovalduringextractionofmandibularpremolarsaprospectiveclinicalstudy AT firasajamil successofusing2lidocaineinpainremovalduringextractionofmandibularpremolarsaprospectiveclinicalstudy AT hudamoutazasmael successofusing2lidocaineinpainremovalduringextractionofmandibularpremolarsaprospectiveclinicalstudy AT mohammedyahyaaljarsha successofusing2lidocaineinpainremovalduringextractionofmandibularpremolarsaprospectiveclinicalstudy |
_version_ |
1724568469679112192 |