Physiologic Scoring Systems versus Glasgow Coma Scale in Predicting In-Hospital Mortality of Trauma Patients; a Diagnostic Accuracy Study

Introduction: In recent years, several scoring systems have been developed to assess the severity of trauma and predict the outcome of trauma patients. This study aimed to compare Rapid Emergency Medicine Score (REMS), Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS), Injury Severity Score (ISS), and Glasgow Co...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Farhad Heydari, Reza Azizkhani, Omid Ahmadi, Saeed Majidinejad, Mohammad Nasr-Esfahani, Ahmad Ahmadi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences 2021-09-01
Series:Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/aaem/index.php/AAEM/article/view/1376
id doaj-c447bc4764714ab68893ec82892a1fce
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c447bc4764714ab68893ec82892a1fce2021-09-24T08:01:11ZengShahid Beheshti University of Medical SciencesArchives of Academic Emergency Medicine2645-49042021-09-019110.22037/aaem.v9i1.1376Physiologic Scoring Systems versus Glasgow Coma Scale in Predicting In-Hospital Mortality of Trauma Patients; a Diagnostic Accuracy StudyFarhad Heydari0Reza AzizkhaniOmid AhmadiSaeed MajidinejadMohammad Nasr-EsfahaniAhmad AhmadiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran Introduction: In recent years, several scoring systems have been developed to assess the severity of trauma and predict the outcome of trauma patients. This study aimed to compare Rapid Emergency Medicine Score (REMS), Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS), Injury Severity Score (ISS), and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) in predicting the in-hospital mortality of trauma patients. Methods: This diagnostic accuracy study was done on adult patients admitted to the emergency department (ED) between June 21, 2019, and September 21, 2020, following multiple trauma. Patients were followed as long as they were hospitalized. The REMS, MEWS, GCS, and ISS were calculated after data gathering and comprehensive assessment of injuries. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis was performed to examine the prognostic performance of the four different tools. Results: Of the 754 patients, 32 patients (4.2%) died and 722 (95.8%) survived after 24 hours of admission. The mean age of the patients was 38.54 ± 18.58 years (78.9% male). The area under the ROC curves (AUC) of REMS, MEWS, ISS, and GCS score for predicting in-hospital mortality were 0.942 (95% CI [0.923-0.958]), 0.886 (95% CI [0.861-0.908]), 0.866 (95% CI [0.839-0.889]), and 0.851 (95% CI [0.823-0.876]), respectively. The AUC of REMS was significantly higher than GCS (p=0.035). The sensitivities of GCS ≤ 11, ISS ≥ 13, REMS ≥ 4, and MEWS ≥ 3 scores for in-hospital mortality were 0.56, 0.97, 0.81, and 0.94, respectively. Also, the specificities of GCS, ISS, REMS, and MEWS scores for in-hospital mortality were 0.93, 0.82, 0.81, and 0.85, respectively. Conclusion: It seems that REMS is more accurate than GCS, ISS, and MEWS in predicting in-hospital mortality ≥ 24 hours of multiple trauma patients. https://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/aaem/index.php/AAEM/article/view/1376Multiple traumaInjury severity scorescoring system/ Clinical Decision RulesEmergency service, hospitalPatient outcome assessmentPrognosis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Farhad Heydari
Reza Azizkhani
Omid Ahmadi
Saeed Majidinejad
Mohammad Nasr-Esfahani
Ahmad Ahmadi
spellingShingle Farhad Heydari
Reza Azizkhani
Omid Ahmadi
Saeed Majidinejad
Mohammad Nasr-Esfahani
Ahmad Ahmadi
Physiologic Scoring Systems versus Glasgow Coma Scale in Predicting In-Hospital Mortality of Trauma Patients; a Diagnostic Accuracy Study
Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine
Multiple trauma
Injury severity score
scoring system/ Clinical Decision Rules
Emergency service, hospital
Patient outcome assessment
Prognosis
author_facet Farhad Heydari
Reza Azizkhani
Omid Ahmadi
Saeed Majidinejad
Mohammad Nasr-Esfahani
Ahmad Ahmadi
author_sort Farhad Heydari
title Physiologic Scoring Systems versus Glasgow Coma Scale in Predicting In-Hospital Mortality of Trauma Patients; a Diagnostic Accuracy Study
title_short Physiologic Scoring Systems versus Glasgow Coma Scale in Predicting In-Hospital Mortality of Trauma Patients; a Diagnostic Accuracy Study
title_full Physiologic Scoring Systems versus Glasgow Coma Scale in Predicting In-Hospital Mortality of Trauma Patients; a Diagnostic Accuracy Study
title_fullStr Physiologic Scoring Systems versus Glasgow Coma Scale in Predicting In-Hospital Mortality of Trauma Patients; a Diagnostic Accuracy Study
title_full_unstemmed Physiologic Scoring Systems versus Glasgow Coma Scale in Predicting In-Hospital Mortality of Trauma Patients; a Diagnostic Accuracy Study
title_sort physiologic scoring systems versus glasgow coma scale in predicting in-hospital mortality of trauma patients; a diagnostic accuracy study
publisher Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
series Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine
issn 2645-4904
publishDate 2021-09-01
description Introduction: In recent years, several scoring systems have been developed to assess the severity of trauma and predict the outcome of trauma patients. This study aimed to compare Rapid Emergency Medicine Score (REMS), Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS), Injury Severity Score (ISS), and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) in predicting the in-hospital mortality of trauma patients. Methods: This diagnostic accuracy study was done on adult patients admitted to the emergency department (ED) between June 21, 2019, and September 21, 2020, following multiple trauma. Patients were followed as long as they were hospitalized. The REMS, MEWS, GCS, and ISS were calculated after data gathering and comprehensive assessment of injuries. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis was performed to examine the prognostic performance of the four different tools. Results: Of the 754 patients, 32 patients (4.2%) died and 722 (95.8%) survived after 24 hours of admission. The mean age of the patients was 38.54 ± 18.58 years (78.9% male). The area under the ROC curves (AUC) of REMS, MEWS, ISS, and GCS score for predicting in-hospital mortality were 0.942 (95% CI [0.923-0.958]), 0.886 (95% CI [0.861-0.908]), 0.866 (95% CI [0.839-0.889]), and 0.851 (95% CI [0.823-0.876]), respectively. The AUC of REMS was significantly higher than GCS (p=0.035). The sensitivities of GCS ≤ 11, ISS ≥ 13, REMS ≥ 4, and MEWS ≥ 3 scores for in-hospital mortality were 0.56, 0.97, 0.81, and 0.94, respectively. Also, the specificities of GCS, ISS, REMS, and MEWS scores for in-hospital mortality were 0.93, 0.82, 0.81, and 0.85, respectively. Conclusion: It seems that REMS is more accurate than GCS, ISS, and MEWS in predicting in-hospital mortality ≥ 24 hours of multiple trauma patients.
topic Multiple trauma
Injury severity score
scoring system/ Clinical Decision Rules
Emergency service, hospital
Patient outcome assessment
Prognosis
url https://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/aaem/index.php/AAEM/article/view/1376
work_keys_str_mv AT farhadheydari physiologicscoringsystemsversusglasgowcomascaleinpredictinginhospitalmortalityoftraumapatientsadiagnosticaccuracystudy
AT rezaazizkhani physiologicscoringsystemsversusglasgowcomascaleinpredictinginhospitalmortalityoftraumapatientsadiagnosticaccuracystudy
AT omidahmadi physiologicscoringsystemsversusglasgowcomascaleinpredictinginhospitalmortalityoftraumapatientsadiagnosticaccuracystudy
AT saeedmajidinejad physiologicscoringsystemsversusglasgowcomascaleinpredictinginhospitalmortalityoftraumapatientsadiagnosticaccuracystudy
AT mohammadnasresfahani physiologicscoringsystemsversusglasgowcomascaleinpredictinginhospitalmortalityoftraumapatientsadiagnosticaccuracystudy
AT ahmadahmadi physiologicscoringsystemsversusglasgowcomascaleinpredictinginhospitalmortalityoftraumapatientsadiagnosticaccuracystudy
_version_ 1717370059275370496