Wind Speed Prediction by Using Different Wavelet Conjunction Models

Three wavelet conjunction models, wavelet-genetic programming (WGEP), wavelet-neuro-fuzzy (WNF) and wavelet-neural network (WNN) were introduced in this paper for predicting hourly and daily wind speed values with three lag times. Hourly wind speed measurements from Darwin Airport synoptic station a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ozgur Kisi, Jalal Shiri, Oleg Makarynskyy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2011-09-01
Series:International Journal of Ocean and Climate Systems
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1260/1759-3131.2.3.189
id doaj-c44ce180bcd44c569b08fa0433011dac
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c44ce180bcd44c569b08fa0433011dac2020-11-25T01:54:57ZengSAGE PublishingInternational Journal of Ocean and Climate Systems1759-31311759-314X2011-09-01210.1260/1759-3131.2.3.18910.1260_1759-3131.2.3.189Wind Speed Prediction by Using Different Wavelet Conjunction ModelsOzgur Kisi0Jalal Shiri1Oleg Makarynskyy2 Engineering Faculty, Civil Engineering Department, Hydraulics Divisions, University of Erciyes, Kayseri, Turkey Water Engineering Department, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz, IR-51664 Tabriz, Iran URS Australia, 17/240 Queen St., Brisbane 4000, AustraliaThree wavelet conjunction models, wavelet-genetic programming (WGEP), wavelet-neuro-fuzzy (WNF) and wavelet-neural network (WNN) were introduced in this paper for predicting hourly and daily wind speed values with three lag times. Hourly wind speed measurements from Darwin Airport synoptic station and daily wind speed data from Tabriz Station (North-western Iran) were used as inputs to the wavelet conjunction models to predict 1-, 2- and 3-hour and 1-, 2- and 3-days ahead wind speeds. First, conventional GEP, NF and ANN models were applied to the wind speed time series. Then WGEP, WNF and WANN conjunction models were also used for the same purpose and their results were compared with those of the conventional GEP, NF and ANNs. The correlation coefficient, root mean squared error, scatter index and mean absolute error were used to evaluate the performance of the models. Inter-comparisons of model results indicated that the use of wavelet conjunction models increased the performance of the conventional GEP, ANFIS and ANN in forecasting hourly and daily wind speeds.https://doi.org/10.1260/1759-3131.2.3.189
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ozgur Kisi
Jalal Shiri
Oleg Makarynskyy
spellingShingle Ozgur Kisi
Jalal Shiri
Oleg Makarynskyy
Wind Speed Prediction by Using Different Wavelet Conjunction Models
International Journal of Ocean and Climate Systems
author_facet Ozgur Kisi
Jalal Shiri
Oleg Makarynskyy
author_sort Ozgur Kisi
title Wind Speed Prediction by Using Different Wavelet Conjunction Models
title_short Wind Speed Prediction by Using Different Wavelet Conjunction Models
title_full Wind Speed Prediction by Using Different Wavelet Conjunction Models
title_fullStr Wind Speed Prediction by Using Different Wavelet Conjunction Models
title_full_unstemmed Wind Speed Prediction by Using Different Wavelet Conjunction Models
title_sort wind speed prediction by using different wavelet conjunction models
publisher SAGE Publishing
series International Journal of Ocean and Climate Systems
issn 1759-3131
1759-314X
publishDate 2011-09-01
description Three wavelet conjunction models, wavelet-genetic programming (WGEP), wavelet-neuro-fuzzy (WNF) and wavelet-neural network (WNN) were introduced in this paper for predicting hourly and daily wind speed values with three lag times. Hourly wind speed measurements from Darwin Airport synoptic station and daily wind speed data from Tabriz Station (North-western Iran) were used as inputs to the wavelet conjunction models to predict 1-, 2- and 3-hour and 1-, 2- and 3-days ahead wind speeds. First, conventional GEP, NF and ANN models were applied to the wind speed time series. Then WGEP, WNF and WANN conjunction models were also used for the same purpose and their results were compared with those of the conventional GEP, NF and ANNs. The correlation coefficient, root mean squared error, scatter index and mean absolute error were used to evaluate the performance of the models. Inter-comparisons of model results indicated that the use of wavelet conjunction models increased the performance of the conventional GEP, ANFIS and ANN in forecasting hourly and daily wind speeds.
url https://doi.org/10.1260/1759-3131.2.3.189
work_keys_str_mv AT ozgurkisi windspeedpredictionbyusingdifferentwaveletconjunctionmodels
AT jalalshiri windspeedpredictionbyusingdifferentwaveletconjunctionmodels
AT olegmakarynskyy windspeedpredictionbyusingdifferentwaveletconjunctionmodels
_version_ 1724985930032349184