Low detection rate in visual observations of stream salmonids in winter

Visual methods in detecting juvenile Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) in winter were assessed, both in a natural subarctic river in northernmost Finland (70°N) and in an experimental flume, both under ice and in open water. Video surveillance was used under different conditions, and at one field sit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jaakko Erkinaro, Aki Mäki-Petäys, Ari Huusko, Jorma Kuusela, Eero Niemelä
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2018-01-01
Series:Journal of Freshwater Ecology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02705060.2018.1492978
id doaj-c454fa774ba2435aa1f282bac1495512
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c454fa774ba2435aa1f282bac14955122020-11-25T02:44:00ZengTaylor & Francis GroupJournal of Freshwater Ecology0270-50602156-69412018-01-0133133534510.1080/02705060.2018.14929781492978Low detection rate in visual observations of stream salmonids in winterJaakko Erkinaro0Aki Mäki-Petäys1Ari Huusko2Jorma Kuusela3Eero Niemelä4Natural Resources Institute Finland (LUKE)Natural Resources Institute Finland (LUKE)Natural Resources Institute Finland (LUKE)Natural Resources Institute Finland (LUKE)Natural Resources Institute Finland (LUKE)Visual methods in detecting juvenile Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) in winter were assessed, both in a natural subarctic river in northernmost Finland (70°N) and in an experimental flume, both under ice and in open water. Video surveillance was used under different conditions, and at one field site, data from video cameras and snorkeling were compared with subsequent electrofishing at the same site. In addition, the activity and visibility of juvenile salmon in cold water was studied under controlled experimental conditions using video, PIT tags and a known number of fish present in a laboratory flume. We documented a poor underwater detection rate for juvenile Atlantic salmon by visual observations in wintertime, both in day and night, and both with and without ice cover. Comparison of successively conducted field experiments at the same site resulted in two salmon parr observations by snorkeling, one by video and 63 individuals by electrofishing. In the laboratory experiment the maximum proportion of fish observed was 33 and 50% of those present in the flume by using video-surveillance and PIT tracking, respectively. Both methods indicated that salmon parr were significantly more visible during the darkness compared to the illuminated hours. These results pose critical questions to the traditional visual observation methods used in winter studies on stream salmonids.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02705060.2018.1492978Salmo salarsalmon parrhabitatwinterbehaviormethodology
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jaakko Erkinaro
Aki Mäki-Petäys
Ari Huusko
Jorma Kuusela
Eero Niemelä
spellingShingle Jaakko Erkinaro
Aki Mäki-Petäys
Ari Huusko
Jorma Kuusela
Eero Niemelä
Low detection rate in visual observations of stream salmonids in winter
Journal of Freshwater Ecology
Salmo salar
salmon parr
habitat
winter
behavior
methodology
author_facet Jaakko Erkinaro
Aki Mäki-Petäys
Ari Huusko
Jorma Kuusela
Eero Niemelä
author_sort Jaakko Erkinaro
title Low detection rate in visual observations of stream salmonids in winter
title_short Low detection rate in visual observations of stream salmonids in winter
title_full Low detection rate in visual observations of stream salmonids in winter
title_fullStr Low detection rate in visual observations of stream salmonids in winter
title_full_unstemmed Low detection rate in visual observations of stream salmonids in winter
title_sort low detection rate in visual observations of stream salmonids in winter
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Journal of Freshwater Ecology
issn 0270-5060
2156-6941
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Visual methods in detecting juvenile Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) in winter were assessed, both in a natural subarctic river in northernmost Finland (70°N) and in an experimental flume, both under ice and in open water. Video surveillance was used under different conditions, and at one field site, data from video cameras and snorkeling were compared with subsequent electrofishing at the same site. In addition, the activity and visibility of juvenile salmon in cold water was studied under controlled experimental conditions using video, PIT tags and a known number of fish present in a laboratory flume. We documented a poor underwater detection rate for juvenile Atlantic salmon by visual observations in wintertime, both in day and night, and both with and without ice cover. Comparison of successively conducted field experiments at the same site resulted in two salmon parr observations by snorkeling, one by video and 63 individuals by electrofishing. In the laboratory experiment the maximum proportion of fish observed was 33 and 50% of those present in the flume by using video-surveillance and PIT tracking, respectively. Both methods indicated that salmon parr were significantly more visible during the darkness compared to the illuminated hours. These results pose critical questions to the traditional visual observation methods used in winter studies on stream salmonids.
topic Salmo salar
salmon parr
habitat
winter
behavior
methodology
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02705060.2018.1492978
work_keys_str_mv AT jaakkoerkinaro lowdetectionrateinvisualobservationsofstreamsalmonidsinwinter
AT akimakipetays lowdetectionrateinvisualobservationsofstreamsalmonidsinwinter
AT arihuusko lowdetectionrateinvisualobservationsofstreamsalmonidsinwinter
AT jormakuusela lowdetectionrateinvisualobservationsofstreamsalmonidsinwinter
AT eeroniemela lowdetectionrateinvisualobservationsofstreamsalmonidsinwinter
_version_ 1724768116874936320