Validation of the self-management ability scale (SMAS) and development and validation of a shorter scale (SMAS-S) among older patients shortly after hospitalisation

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The 30-item Self-Management Ability Scale (SMAS) measures self-management abilities (SMA). Objectives of this study were to (1) validate the SMAS among older people shortly after hospitalisation and (2) shorten the SMAS while maintai...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cramm Jane M, Strating Mathilde MH, de Vreede Paul L, Steverink Nardi, Nieboer Anna P
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2012-01-01
Series:Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
Online Access:http://www.hqlo.com/content/10/1/9
id doaj-c4c15380c3584cb69c10d2057d230af6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c4c15380c3584cb69c10d2057d230af62020-11-25T00:04:26ZengBMCHealth and Quality of Life Outcomes1477-75252012-01-01101910.1186/1477-7525-10-9Validation of the self-management ability scale (SMAS) and development and validation of a shorter scale (SMAS-S) among older patients shortly after hospitalisationCramm Jane MStrating Mathilde MHde Vreede Paul LSteverink NardiNieboer Anna P<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The 30-item Self-Management Ability Scale (SMAS) measures self-management abilities (SMA). Objectives of this study were to (1) validate the SMAS among older people shortly after hospitalisation and (2) shorten the SMAS while maintaining adequate validity and reliability.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Our study was conducted among older individuals (≥ 65) who had recently been discharged from a hospital. Three months after hospital admission, 296/456 patients (65% response) were interviewed in their homes. We tested the instrument by means of structural equation modelling, and examined its validity and reliability. In addition, we tested internal consistency of the SMAS and SMAS-S among a study sample of patients at risk for cardiovascular diseases.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>After eliminating 12 items, the confirmatory factor analyses revealed good indices of fit with the resulting 18-item SMAS (SMAS-S). To estimate construct validity of the instrument, we looked at correlations between SMAS subscale scores and overall well-being scores as measured by Social Product Function (SPF-IL) and Cantril's ladder. All SMAS subscales of the original and short version significantly correlated with SPF-IL scores (all at <it>p </it>≤ 0.001) and Cantril's ladder (for the cognitive well-being subscale <it>p </it>≤ 0.01; all other subscales at <it>p </it>≤ 0.001). The findings indicated validity. Analyses of the SMAS and SMAS-S in the sample of patients at risk for cardiovascular diseases showed that both instruments are reliable.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The psychometric properties of both the SMAS and SMAS-S are good. The SMAS-S is a promising alternate instrument to evaluate self-management abilities.</p> http://www.hqlo.com/content/10/1/9
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Cramm Jane M
Strating Mathilde MH
de Vreede Paul L
Steverink Nardi
Nieboer Anna P
spellingShingle Cramm Jane M
Strating Mathilde MH
de Vreede Paul L
Steverink Nardi
Nieboer Anna P
Validation of the self-management ability scale (SMAS) and development and validation of a shorter scale (SMAS-S) among older patients shortly after hospitalisation
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
author_facet Cramm Jane M
Strating Mathilde MH
de Vreede Paul L
Steverink Nardi
Nieboer Anna P
author_sort Cramm Jane M
title Validation of the self-management ability scale (SMAS) and development and validation of a shorter scale (SMAS-S) among older patients shortly after hospitalisation
title_short Validation of the self-management ability scale (SMAS) and development and validation of a shorter scale (SMAS-S) among older patients shortly after hospitalisation
title_full Validation of the self-management ability scale (SMAS) and development and validation of a shorter scale (SMAS-S) among older patients shortly after hospitalisation
title_fullStr Validation of the self-management ability scale (SMAS) and development and validation of a shorter scale (SMAS-S) among older patients shortly after hospitalisation
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the self-management ability scale (SMAS) and development and validation of a shorter scale (SMAS-S) among older patients shortly after hospitalisation
title_sort validation of the self-management ability scale (smas) and development and validation of a shorter scale (smas-s) among older patients shortly after hospitalisation
publisher BMC
series Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
issn 1477-7525
publishDate 2012-01-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The 30-item Self-Management Ability Scale (SMAS) measures self-management abilities (SMA). Objectives of this study were to (1) validate the SMAS among older people shortly after hospitalisation and (2) shorten the SMAS while maintaining adequate validity and reliability.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Our study was conducted among older individuals (≥ 65) who had recently been discharged from a hospital. Three months after hospital admission, 296/456 patients (65% response) were interviewed in their homes. We tested the instrument by means of structural equation modelling, and examined its validity and reliability. In addition, we tested internal consistency of the SMAS and SMAS-S among a study sample of patients at risk for cardiovascular diseases.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>After eliminating 12 items, the confirmatory factor analyses revealed good indices of fit with the resulting 18-item SMAS (SMAS-S). To estimate construct validity of the instrument, we looked at correlations between SMAS subscale scores and overall well-being scores as measured by Social Product Function (SPF-IL) and Cantril's ladder. All SMAS subscales of the original and short version significantly correlated with SPF-IL scores (all at <it>p </it>≤ 0.001) and Cantril's ladder (for the cognitive well-being subscale <it>p </it>≤ 0.01; all other subscales at <it>p </it>≤ 0.001). The findings indicated validity. Analyses of the SMAS and SMAS-S in the sample of patients at risk for cardiovascular diseases showed that both instruments are reliable.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The psychometric properties of both the SMAS and SMAS-S are good. The SMAS-S is a promising alternate instrument to evaluate self-management abilities.</p>
url http://www.hqlo.com/content/10/1/9
work_keys_str_mv AT crammjanem validationoftheselfmanagementabilityscalesmasanddevelopmentandvalidationofashorterscalesmassamongolderpatientsshortlyafterhospitalisation
AT stratingmathildemh validationoftheselfmanagementabilityscalesmasanddevelopmentandvalidationofashorterscalesmassamongolderpatientsshortlyafterhospitalisation
AT devreedepaull validationoftheselfmanagementabilityscalesmasanddevelopmentandvalidationofashorterscalesmassamongolderpatientsshortlyafterhospitalisation
AT steverinknardi validationoftheselfmanagementabilityscalesmasanddevelopmentandvalidationofashorterscalesmassamongolderpatientsshortlyafterhospitalisation
AT nieboerannap validationoftheselfmanagementabilityscalesmasanddevelopmentandvalidationofashorterscalesmassamongolderpatientsshortlyafterhospitalisation
_version_ 1725429303870488576