Dynamically assisted Sauter-Schwinger effect — non-perturbative versus perturbative aspects
Abstract The Sauter-Schwinger effect predicts the creation of electron-positron pairs out of the quantum vacuum by a strong and slowly varying electric field. This effect can be dynamically assisted by an additional weaker time-dependent field, which may drastically enhance the pair-creation probabi...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SpringerOpen
2017-06-01
|
Series: | Journal of High Energy Physics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/JHEP06(2017)043 |
id |
doaj-c4cd37ae8aff4ea4aa2112256500f921 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-c4cd37ae8aff4ea4aa2112256500f9212020-11-25T01:40:29ZengSpringerOpenJournal of High Energy Physics1029-84792017-06-012017612610.1007/JHEP06(2017)043Dynamically assisted Sauter-Schwinger effect — non-perturbative versus perturbative aspectsG. Torgrimsson0C. Schneider1J. Oertel2R. Schützhold3Fakultät für Physik, Universität Duisburg-EssenFakultät für Physik, Universität Duisburg-EssenFakultät für Physik, Universität Duisburg-EssenFakultät für Physik, Universität Duisburg-EssenAbstract The Sauter-Schwinger effect predicts the creation of electron-positron pairs out of the quantum vacuum by a strong and slowly varying electric field. This effect can be dynamically assisted by an additional weaker time-dependent field, which may drastically enhance the pair-creation probability. In previous studies, it has been found that the enhancement may crucially depend on the temporal shape of this weaker pulse, e.g., a Gaussian profile exp{−(ωt)2} or a Sauter pulse 1/ cosh2(ωt) behave quite differently. In order to understand this difference, we make a perturbative expansion in terms of the weaker field while treating the strong electric field non-perturbatively. For a large class of profiles including the Sauter pulse, already the sum of the zeroth-order and the first-order amplitudes of this perturbative expansion yields good agreement. For other cases, such as a Gaussian or sinusoidal profile, this is not true in general and higher orders can yield the dominant contribution — where the dominant order depends on the chosen parameters. Our findings are confirmed by numerical simulations and help us to sort previous results into a bigger picture.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/JHEP06(2017)043Nonperturbative EffectsSolitons Monopoles and Instantons |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
G. Torgrimsson C. Schneider J. Oertel R. Schützhold |
spellingShingle |
G. Torgrimsson C. Schneider J. Oertel R. Schützhold Dynamically assisted Sauter-Schwinger effect — non-perturbative versus perturbative aspects Journal of High Energy Physics Nonperturbative Effects Solitons Monopoles and Instantons |
author_facet |
G. Torgrimsson C. Schneider J. Oertel R. Schützhold |
author_sort |
G. Torgrimsson |
title |
Dynamically assisted Sauter-Schwinger effect — non-perturbative versus perturbative aspects |
title_short |
Dynamically assisted Sauter-Schwinger effect — non-perturbative versus perturbative aspects |
title_full |
Dynamically assisted Sauter-Schwinger effect — non-perturbative versus perturbative aspects |
title_fullStr |
Dynamically assisted Sauter-Schwinger effect — non-perturbative versus perturbative aspects |
title_full_unstemmed |
Dynamically assisted Sauter-Schwinger effect — non-perturbative versus perturbative aspects |
title_sort |
dynamically assisted sauter-schwinger effect — non-perturbative versus perturbative aspects |
publisher |
SpringerOpen |
series |
Journal of High Energy Physics |
issn |
1029-8479 |
publishDate |
2017-06-01 |
description |
Abstract The Sauter-Schwinger effect predicts the creation of electron-positron pairs out of the quantum vacuum by a strong and slowly varying electric field. This effect can be dynamically assisted by an additional weaker time-dependent field, which may drastically enhance the pair-creation probability. In previous studies, it has been found that the enhancement may crucially depend on the temporal shape of this weaker pulse, e.g., a Gaussian profile exp{−(ωt)2} or a Sauter pulse 1/ cosh2(ωt) behave quite differently. In order to understand this difference, we make a perturbative expansion in terms of the weaker field while treating the strong electric field non-perturbatively. For a large class of profiles including the Sauter pulse, already the sum of the zeroth-order and the first-order amplitudes of this perturbative expansion yields good agreement. For other cases, such as a Gaussian or sinusoidal profile, this is not true in general and higher orders can yield the dominant contribution — where the dominant order depends on the chosen parameters. Our findings are confirmed by numerical simulations and help us to sort previous results into a bigger picture. |
topic |
Nonperturbative Effects Solitons Monopoles and Instantons |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/JHEP06(2017)043 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT gtorgrimsson dynamicallyassistedsauterschwingereffectnonperturbativeversusperturbativeaspects AT cschneider dynamicallyassistedsauterschwingereffectnonperturbativeversusperturbativeaspects AT joertel dynamicallyassistedsauterschwingereffectnonperturbativeversusperturbativeaspects AT rschutzhold dynamicallyassistedsauterschwingereffectnonperturbativeversusperturbativeaspects |
_version_ |
1725045503472697344 |