Dynamically assisted Sauter-Schwinger effect — non-perturbative versus perturbative aspects

Abstract The Sauter-Schwinger effect predicts the creation of electron-positron pairs out of the quantum vacuum by a strong and slowly varying electric field. This effect can be dynamically assisted by an additional weaker time-dependent field, which may drastically enhance the pair-creation probabi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: G. Torgrimsson, C. Schneider, J. Oertel, R. Schützhold
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2017-06-01
Series:Journal of High Energy Physics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/JHEP06(2017)043
id doaj-c4cd37ae8aff4ea4aa2112256500f921
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c4cd37ae8aff4ea4aa2112256500f9212020-11-25T01:40:29ZengSpringerOpenJournal of High Energy Physics1029-84792017-06-012017612610.1007/JHEP06(2017)043Dynamically assisted Sauter-Schwinger effect — non-perturbative versus perturbative aspectsG. Torgrimsson0C. Schneider1J. Oertel2R. Schützhold3Fakultät für Physik, Universität Duisburg-EssenFakultät für Physik, Universität Duisburg-EssenFakultät für Physik, Universität Duisburg-EssenFakultät für Physik, Universität Duisburg-EssenAbstract The Sauter-Schwinger effect predicts the creation of electron-positron pairs out of the quantum vacuum by a strong and slowly varying electric field. This effect can be dynamically assisted by an additional weaker time-dependent field, which may drastically enhance the pair-creation probability. In previous studies, it has been found that the enhancement may crucially depend on the temporal shape of this weaker pulse, e.g., a Gaussian profile exp{−(ωt)2} or a Sauter pulse 1/ cosh2(ωt) behave quite differently. In order to understand this difference, we make a perturbative expansion in terms of the weaker field while treating the strong electric field non-perturbatively. For a large class of profiles including the Sauter pulse, already the sum of the zeroth-order and the first-order amplitudes of this perturbative expansion yields good agreement. For other cases, such as a Gaussian or sinusoidal profile, this is not true in general and higher orders can yield the dominant contribution — where the dominant order depends on the chosen parameters. Our findings are confirmed by numerical simulations and help us to sort previous results into a bigger picture.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/JHEP06(2017)043Nonperturbative EffectsSolitons Monopoles and Instantons
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author G. Torgrimsson
C. Schneider
J. Oertel
R. Schützhold
spellingShingle G. Torgrimsson
C. Schneider
J. Oertel
R. Schützhold
Dynamically assisted Sauter-Schwinger effect — non-perturbative versus perturbative aspects
Journal of High Energy Physics
Nonperturbative Effects
Solitons Monopoles and Instantons
author_facet G. Torgrimsson
C. Schneider
J. Oertel
R. Schützhold
author_sort G. Torgrimsson
title Dynamically assisted Sauter-Schwinger effect — non-perturbative versus perturbative aspects
title_short Dynamically assisted Sauter-Schwinger effect — non-perturbative versus perturbative aspects
title_full Dynamically assisted Sauter-Schwinger effect — non-perturbative versus perturbative aspects
title_fullStr Dynamically assisted Sauter-Schwinger effect — non-perturbative versus perturbative aspects
title_full_unstemmed Dynamically assisted Sauter-Schwinger effect — non-perturbative versus perturbative aspects
title_sort dynamically assisted sauter-schwinger effect — non-perturbative versus perturbative aspects
publisher SpringerOpen
series Journal of High Energy Physics
issn 1029-8479
publishDate 2017-06-01
description Abstract The Sauter-Schwinger effect predicts the creation of electron-positron pairs out of the quantum vacuum by a strong and slowly varying electric field. This effect can be dynamically assisted by an additional weaker time-dependent field, which may drastically enhance the pair-creation probability. In previous studies, it has been found that the enhancement may crucially depend on the temporal shape of this weaker pulse, e.g., a Gaussian profile exp{−(ωt)2} or a Sauter pulse 1/ cosh2(ωt) behave quite differently. In order to understand this difference, we make a perturbative expansion in terms of the weaker field while treating the strong electric field non-perturbatively. For a large class of profiles including the Sauter pulse, already the sum of the zeroth-order and the first-order amplitudes of this perturbative expansion yields good agreement. For other cases, such as a Gaussian or sinusoidal profile, this is not true in general and higher orders can yield the dominant contribution — where the dominant order depends on the chosen parameters. Our findings are confirmed by numerical simulations and help us to sort previous results into a bigger picture.
topic Nonperturbative Effects
Solitons Monopoles and Instantons
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/JHEP06(2017)043
work_keys_str_mv AT gtorgrimsson dynamicallyassistedsauterschwingereffectnonperturbativeversusperturbativeaspects
AT cschneider dynamicallyassistedsauterschwingereffectnonperturbativeversusperturbativeaspects
AT joertel dynamicallyassistedsauterschwingereffectnonperturbativeversusperturbativeaspects
AT rschutzhold dynamicallyassistedsauterschwingereffectnonperturbativeversusperturbativeaspects
_version_ 1725045503472697344