Comparison of Antibiotic Resistance Profile between Salmonella Spp., Salmonella Enterica Ser. Typhimurium and Enteritidis and Escherichia Coli Isolated from Rectal Swabs of Chicken

The aim of this experiment was comparing of antibiotic resistance profile between Salmonella spp. and Escherichia coli isolated from rectal swabs of chicken from conventional breeding. For the antibiotic susceptibility testing disk diffusion method was used. The both tested bacteria were exposed aga...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lukáš Hleba, Miroslava Kačániová, Jadža Lejková, Jaroslav Pochop
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Agroprint Timisoara 2011-05-01
Series:Scientific Papers Animal Science and Biotechnologies
Subjects:
Online Access:http://spasb.ro/index.php/spasb/article/view/525
id doaj-c4d8f27a54954b89be1f9883b9b6fd47
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c4d8f27a54954b89be1f9883b9b6fd472020-11-25T04:01:43ZengAgroprint TimisoaraScientific Papers Animal Science and Biotechnologies1841-93642344-45762011-05-01441401407449Comparison of Antibiotic Resistance Profile between Salmonella Spp., Salmonella Enterica Ser. Typhimurium and Enteritidis and Escherichia Coli Isolated from Rectal Swabs of ChickenLukáš Hleba0Miroslava Kačániová1Jadža Lejková2Jaroslav Pochop3Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Science, Department of Microbiology, NitraFaculty of Biotechnology and Food Science, Department of Microbiology, NitraFaculty of Biotechnology and Food Science, Department of Microbiology, NitraFaculty of Biotechnology and Food Science, Department of Microbiology, NitraThe aim of this experiment was comparing of antibiotic resistance profile between Salmonella spp. and Escherichia coli isolated from rectal swabs of chicken from conventional breeding. For the antibiotic susceptibility testing disk diffusion method was used. The both tested bacteria were exposed against thirteen antibiotics: ampicillin, piperacillin, cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, doripenem, meropenem, levofloxacin, ofloxacin, amikacin, gentamycin, tygecycline, tetracycline and chloramphenicol. For the identification of these strains, we used Chromogenic coliform agar, Triple sugar iron agar and biochemical test (ENTEROtest 24). We identified Salmonella spp. by used MicroSEQ® Salmonella spp. Detection Kit for identification of this strain in Step ONE Real Time PCR. In this study, we determined that Salmonella spp. was more resistant like Escherichia coli. The highest resistance had isolates of Salmonella spp. to levofloxacin (100%) and to ofloxacin (100%). Also to ampicillin was resistance in Salmonella spp. isolates about 83%. Only in case of piperacillin was resistance in Salmonella spp. isolates lower (50%) like in Escherichia coli isolates (66.6%). The both strains were 100 % sensitive to doripenem, meropenem, amikacin, gentamycin and tygecycline. Antibiotic resistance is a biological danger. Bacteria, which we study, are considered to reservoirs of resistant genes and they are facultative and obligate pathogens. If these pathogen bacteria cause diseases those these diseases are difficult to treat.http://spasb.ro/index.php/spasb/article/view/525antibiotic resistancechickenescherichia colirectalsalmonella spp
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lukáš Hleba
Miroslava Kačániová
Jadža Lejková
Jaroslav Pochop
spellingShingle Lukáš Hleba
Miroslava Kačániová
Jadža Lejková
Jaroslav Pochop
Comparison of Antibiotic Resistance Profile between Salmonella Spp., Salmonella Enterica Ser. Typhimurium and Enteritidis and Escherichia Coli Isolated from Rectal Swabs of Chicken
Scientific Papers Animal Science and Biotechnologies
antibiotic resistance
chicken
escherichia coli
rectal
salmonella spp
author_facet Lukáš Hleba
Miroslava Kačániová
Jadža Lejková
Jaroslav Pochop
author_sort Lukáš Hleba
title Comparison of Antibiotic Resistance Profile between Salmonella Spp., Salmonella Enterica Ser. Typhimurium and Enteritidis and Escherichia Coli Isolated from Rectal Swabs of Chicken
title_short Comparison of Antibiotic Resistance Profile between Salmonella Spp., Salmonella Enterica Ser. Typhimurium and Enteritidis and Escherichia Coli Isolated from Rectal Swabs of Chicken
title_full Comparison of Antibiotic Resistance Profile between Salmonella Spp., Salmonella Enterica Ser. Typhimurium and Enteritidis and Escherichia Coli Isolated from Rectal Swabs of Chicken
title_fullStr Comparison of Antibiotic Resistance Profile between Salmonella Spp., Salmonella Enterica Ser. Typhimurium and Enteritidis and Escherichia Coli Isolated from Rectal Swabs of Chicken
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Antibiotic Resistance Profile between Salmonella Spp., Salmonella Enterica Ser. Typhimurium and Enteritidis and Escherichia Coli Isolated from Rectal Swabs of Chicken
title_sort comparison of antibiotic resistance profile between salmonella spp., salmonella enterica ser. typhimurium and enteritidis and escherichia coli isolated from rectal swabs of chicken
publisher Agroprint Timisoara
series Scientific Papers Animal Science and Biotechnologies
issn 1841-9364
2344-4576
publishDate 2011-05-01
description The aim of this experiment was comparing of antibiotic resistance profile between Salmonella spp. and Escherichia coli isolated from rectal swabs of chicken from conventional breeding. For the antibiotic susceptibility testing disk diffusion method was used. The both tested bacteria were exposed against thirteen antibiotics: ampicillin, piperacillin, cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, doripenem, meropenem, levofloxacin, ofloxacin, amikacin, gentamycin, tygecycline, tetracycline and chloramphenicol. For the identification of these strains, we used Chromogenic coliform agar, Triple sugar iron agar and biochemical test (ENTEROtest 24). We identified Salmonella spp. by used MicroSEQ® Salmonella spp. Detection Kit for identification of this strain in Step ONE Real Time PCR. In this study, we determined that Salmonella spp. was more resistant like Escherichia coli. The highest resistance had isolates of Salmonella spp. to levofloxacin (100%) and to ofloxacin (100%). Also to ampicillin was resistance in Salmonella spp. isolates about 83%. Only in case of piperacillin was resistance in Salmonella spp. isolates lower (50%) like in Escherichia coli isolates (66.6%). The both strains were 100 % sensitive to doripenem, meropenem, amikacin, gentamycin and tygecycline. Antibiotic resistance is a biological danger. Bacteria, which we study, are considered to reservoirs of resistant genes and they are facultative and obligate pathogens. If these pathogen bacteria cause diseases those these diseases are difficult to treat.
topic antibiotic resistance
chicken
escherichia coli
rectal
salmonella spp
url http://spasb.ro/index.php/spasb/article/view/525
work_keys_str_mv AT lukashleba comparisonofantibioticresistanceprofilebetweensalmonellasppsalmonellaentericasertyphimuriumandenteritidisandescherichiacoliisolatedfromrectalswabsofchicken
AT miroslavakacaniova comparisonofantibioticresistanceprofilebetweensalmonellasppsalmonellaentericasertyphimuriumandenteritidisandescherichiacoliisolatedfromrectalswabsofchicken
AT jadzalejkova comparisonofantibioticresistanceprofilebetweensalmonellasppsalmonellaentericasertyphimuriumandenteritidisandescherichiacoliisolatedfromrectalswabsofchicken
AT jaroslavpochop comparisonofantibioticresistanceprofilebetweensalmonellasppsalmonellaentericasertyphimuriumandenteritidisandescherichiacoliisolatedfromrectalswabsofchicken
_version_ 1724445482299686912