Antibacterial activity of Camellia sinensis versus propolis against Streptococcus mutans

Introduction: Green tea (Camellia sinensis) and propolis contain flavonoids which inhibit the growth, metabolism and co-aggregation of Streptococcus mutans, the main causative agent of dental caries. Objective: Evaluate the antibacterial activity in vitro of 10% and 20% green tea (Camellia sinensi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cesar Felix Cayo Rojas, Luis Adolfo Cervantes Ganoza
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Editorial Ciencias Médicas 2020-03-01
Series:Revista Cubana de Estomatología
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.revestomatologia.sld.cu/index.php/est/article/view/2967
id doaj-c4fd7b062c1749ae89eb6e8600c49ace
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c4fd7b062c1749ae89eb6e8600c49ace2020-11-25T04:06:55ZengEditorial Ciencias MédicasRevista Cubana de Estomatología0034-75071561-297X2020-03-01571e2967e2967986Antibacterial activity of Camellia sinensis versus propolis against Streptococcus mutansCesar Felix Cayo Rojas0Luis Adolfo Cervantes Ganoza1Universidad Inca Garcilaso de la Vega, Instituto de Investigación. Lima. Universidad Inca Garcilaso de la Vega, Facultad de Estomatología. Lima. Universidad Nacional Federico Villarreal, Escuela Universitaria de Posgrado. LimaUniversidad Inca Garcilaso de la Vega, Facultad de Estomatología. LimaIntroduction: Green tea (Camellia sinensis) and propolis contain flavonoids which inhibit the growth, metabolism and co-aggregation of Streptococcus mutans, the main causative agent of dental caries. Objective: Evaluate the antibacterial activity in vitro of 10% and 20% green tea (Camellia sinensis) ethanolic extract versus 10% and 20% propolis ethanolic extract against the growth of Streptococcus mutans (ATCC 25175) strains. Methods: An in vitro experimental prospective longitudinal comparative study was conducted. The study universe was 90 diffusion disks and the sample was 15 disks soaked up in green tea (Camellia sinensis) or propolis at various concentrations, 0.12% aqueous chlorhexidine and distilled water. Sample size was estimated by the comparison of means formula after conducting a pilot study. The diffusion disks soaked up in the substances were placed on Mueller Hinton agar planted with Streptococcus mutans (ATCC 25175) and the width of the inhibition haloes was measured at 24 h and 48 h. Nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis comparison tests and the Wilcoxon rank test were performed. Results: The maximum width of the inhibition halo achieved by 0.12% aqueous chlorhexidine, 20% green tea (Camellia sinensis) ethanolic extract, and 20% propolis ethanolic extract at 24 h was 10.64 mm ± 0.924 mm, 6.82 mm ± 0.982 mm and 8.36 mm ± 1.286 mm, respectively. The 20% green tea (Camellia sinensis) ethanolic extract showed statistically significant differences with respect to the 20% propolis ethanolic extract, both at 24 h (p= 0.013) and at 48 h (p= 0.011). Conclusions: The 20% propolis ethanolic extract displays greater antibacterial activity against the growth of Streptococcus mutans (ATCC 25175) strains than the 10% and 20% green tea (Camellia sinensis) ethanolic extract. This activity decreases with the passing of time.http://www.revestomatologia.sld.cu/index.php/est/article/view/2967camellia sinensis (té verde)propóleoclorhexidina.
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Cesar Felix Cayo Rojas
Luis Adolfo Cervantes Ganoza
spellingShingle Cesar Felix Cayo Rojas
Luis Adolfo Cervantes Ganoza
Antibacterial activity of Camellia sinensis versus propolis against Streptococcus mutans
Revista Cubana de Estomatología
camellia sinensis (té verde)
propóleo
clorhexidina.
author_facet Cesar Felix Cayo Rojas
Luis Adolfo Cervantes Ganoza
author_sort Cesar Felix Cayo Rojas
title Antibacterial activity of Camellia sinensis versus propolis against Streptococcus mutans
title_short Antibacterial activity of Camellia sinensis versus propolis against Streptococcus mutans
title_full Antibacterial activity of Camellia sinensis versus propolis against Streptococcus mutans
title_fullStr Antibacterial activity of Camellia sinensis versus propolis against Streptococcus mutans
title_full_unstemmed Antibacterial activity of Camellia sinensis versus propolis against Streptococcus mutans
title_sort antibacterial activity of camellia sinensis versus propolis against streptococcus mutans
publisher Editorial Ciencias Médicas
series Revista Cubana de Estomatología
issn 0034-7507
1561-297X
publishDate 2020-03-01
description Introduction: Green tea (Camellia sinensis) and propolis contain flavonoids which inhibit the growth, metabolism and co-aggregation of Streptococcus mutans, the main causative agent of dental caries. Objective: Evaluate the antibacterial activity in vitro of 10% and 20% green tea (Camellia sinensis) ethanolic extract versus 10% and 20% propolis ethanolic extract against the growth of Streptococcus mutans (ATCC 25175) strains. Methods: An in vitro experimental prospective longitudinal comparative study was conducted. The study universe was 90 diffusion disks and the sample was 15 disks soaked up in green tea (Camellia sinensis) or propolis at various concentrations, 0.12% aqueous chlorhexidine and distilled water. Sample size was estimated by the comparison of means formula after conducting a pilot study. The diffusion disks soaked up in the substances were placed on Mueller Hinton agar planted with Streptococcus mutans (ATCC 25175) and the width of the inhibition haloes was measured at 24 h and 48 h. Nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis comparison tests and the Wilcoxon rank test were performed. Results: The maximum width of the inhibition halo achieved by 0.12% aqueous chlorhexidine, 20% green tea (Camellia sinensis) ethanolic extract, and 20% propolis ethanolic extract at 24 h was 10.64 mm ± 0.924 mm, 6.82 mm ± 0.982 mm and 8.36 mm ± 1.286 mm, respectively. The 20% green tea (Camellia sinensis) ethanolic extract showed statistically significant differences with respect to the 20% propolis ethanolic extract, both at 24 h (p= 0.013) and at 48 h (p= 0.011). Conclusions: The 20% propolis ethanolic extract displays greater antibacterial activity against the growth of Streptococcus mutans (ATCC 25175) strains than the 10% and 20% green tea (Camellia sinensis) ethanolic extract. This activity decreases with the passing of time.
topic camellia sinensis (té verde)
propóleo
clorhexidina.
url http://www.revestomatologia.sld.cu/index.php/est/article/view/2967
work_keys_str_mv AT cesarfelixcayorojas antibacterialactivityofcamelliasinensisversuspropolisagainststreptococcusmutans
AT luisadolfocervantesganoza antibacterialactivityofcamelliasinensisversuspropolisagainststreptococcusmutans
_version_ 1724430170768539648