Accuracy and precision of abdominal diameter measurement by a new instrument

Objective: To study the accuracy and precision of abdominal diameter measurement of a new instrument. Material and Methods: Nineteen healthy volunteers (15 men and 4 women) aged 20-44 year and median body mass index of 22.0 kg/m2 (range 18.8-36.8) were studied. The sagittal and transverse abdominal...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: A Thamprasit, W Setasuban, S Soonthornpun
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Prince of Songkla University 2005-06-01
Series:Journal of Health Science and Medical Research (JHSMR)
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.jhsmr.org/index.php/jhsmr/article/view/517
id doaj-c51198e0484c46e7a94912e94d4ab41f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c51198e0484c46e7a94912e94d4ab41f2020-11-25T00:32:37ZengPrince of Songkla UniversityJournal of Health Science and Medical Research (JHSMR)2586-99812630-05592005-06-01233145149531Accuracy and precision of abdominal diameter measurement by a new instrumentA Thamprasit0W Setasuban1S Soonthornpun2Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla 90110,Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla 90110,Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla 90110,Objective: To study the accuracy and precision of abdominal diameter measurement of a new instrument. Material and Methods: Nineteen healthy volunteers (15 men and 4 women) aged 20-44 year and median body mass index of 22.0 kg/m2 (range 18.8-36.8) were studied. The sagittal and transverse abdominal diameter were measured by the computed tomography scan and the new instrument on the same occasion. Results: There was a good correlation between the abdominal diameters measured by the new instrument and those measured by the computed tomography scan with correlation coefficient of 0.95 for sagittal abdominal diameter and 0.99 for transverse abdominal diameter. The mean difference+SD of the differences of the sagittal and transverse abdominal diameter measured by the new instrument and those by the computed tomography scan were 0.67+0.81 cm and -0.89+0.63 cm, respectively. Conclusion: This new instrument has good accuracy and precision in measuring the abdominal diameters.https://www.jhsmr.org/index.php/jhsmr/article/view/517anthropometry, sagittal abdominal diameter, transverse abdominal diameter, visceral fat
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author A Thamprasit
W Setasuban
S Soonthornpun
spellingShingle A Thamprasit
W Setasuban
S Soonthornpun
Accuracy and precision of abdominal diameter measurement by a new instrument
Journal of Health Science and Medical Research (JHSMR)
anthropometry, sagittal abdominal diameter, transverse abdominal diameter, visceral fat
author_facet A Thamprasit
W Setasuban
S Soonthornpun
author_sort A Thamprasit
title Accuracy and precision of abdominal diameter measurement by a new instrument
title_short Accuracy and precision of abdominal diameter measurement by a new instrument
title_full Accuracy and precision of abdominal diameter measurement by a new instrument
title_fullStr Accuracy and precision of abdominal diameter measurement by a new instrument
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy and precision of abdominal diameter measurement by a new instrument
title_sort accuracy and precision of abdominal diameter measurement by a new instrument
publisher Prince of Songkla University
series Journal of Health Science and Medical Research (JHSMR)
issn 2586-9981
2630-0559
publishDate 2005-06-01
description Objective: To study the accuracy and precision of abdominal diameter measurement of a new instrument. Material and Methods: Nineteen healthy volunteers (15 men and 4 women) aged 20-44 year and median body mass index of 22.0 kg/m2 (range 18.8-36.8) were studied. The sagittal and transverse abdominal diameter were measured by the computed tomography scan and the new instrument on the same occasion. Results: There was a good correlation between the abdominal diameters measured by the new instrument and those measured by the computed tomography scan with correlation coefficient of 0.95 for sagittal abdominal diameter and 0.99 for transverse abdominal diameter. The mean difference+SD of the differences of the sagittal and transverse abdominal diameter measured by the new instrument and those by the computed tomography scan were 0.67+0.81 cm and -0.89+0.63 cm, respectively. Conclusion: This new instrument has good accuracy and precision in measuring the abdominal diameters.
topic anthropometry, sagittal abdominal diameter, transverse abdominal diameter, visceral fat
url https://www.jhsmr.org/index.php/jhsmr/article/view/517
work_keys_str_mv AT athamprasit accuracyandprecisionofabdominaldiametermeasurementbyanewinstrument
AT wsetasuban accuracyandprecisionofabdominaldiametermeasurementbyanewinstrument
AT ssoonthornpun accuracyandprecisionofabdominaldiametermeasurementbyanewinstrument
_version_ 1725319904387661824