A Comparison Between Subjective and Objective Methods of Predicting Health Care Expenses to Support Consumers’ Health Insurance Plan Choice
Objective. Numerous electronic tools help consumers select health insurance plans based on their estimated health care utilization. However, the best way to personalize these tools is unknown. The purpose of this study was to compare two common methods of personalizing health insurance plan displays...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2018-06-01
|
Series: | MDM Policy & Practice |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/2381468318781093 |
id |
doaj-c5348bc66f414aee8b24985e07928198 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-c5348bc66f414aee8b24985e079281982020-11-25T02:48:08ZengSAGE PublishingMDM Policy & Practice2381-46832018-06-01310.1177/2381468318781093A Comparison Between Subjective and Objective Methods of Predicting Health Care Expenses to Support Consumers’ Health Insurance Plan ChoiceMary C. PolitiEnbal ShachamAbigail R. BarkerNerissa GeorgeNageen MirSydney PhilpottJingxia Esther LiuEllen PetersObjective. Numerous electronic tools help consumers select health insurance plans based on their estimated health care utilization. However, the best way to personalize these tools is unknown. The purpose of this study was to compare two common methods of personalizing health insurance plan displays: 1) quantitative healthcare utilization predictions using nationally representative Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) data and 2) subjective-health status predictions. We also explored their relations to self-reported health care utilization. Methods. Secondary data analysis was conducted with responses from 327 adults under age 65 considering health insurance enrollment in the Affordable Care Act (ACA) marketplace. Participants were asked to report their subjective health, health conditions, and demographic information. MEPS data were used to estimate predicted annual expenditures based on age, gender, and reported health conditions. Self-reported health care utilization was obtained for 120 participants at a 1-year follow-up. Results. MEPS-based predictions and subjective-health status were related ( P < 0.0001). However, MEPS-predicted ranges within subjective-health categories were large. Subjective health was a less reliable predictor of expenses among older adults (age × subjective health, P = 0.04). Neither significantly related to subsequent self-reported health care utilization ( P = 0.18, P = 0.92, respectively). Conclusions. Because MEPS data are nationally representative, they may approximate utilization better than subjective health, particularly among older adults. However, approximating health care utilization is difficult, especially among newly insured. Findings have implications for health insurance decision support tools that personalize plan displays based on cost estimates.https://doi.org/10.1177/2381468318781093 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Mary C. Politi Enbal Shacham Abigail R. Barker Nerissa George Nageen Mir Sydney Philpott Jingxia Esther Liu Ellen Peters |
spellingShingle |
Mary C. Politi Enbal Shacham Abigail R. Barker Nerissa George Nageen Mir Sydney Philpott Jingxia Esther Liu Ellen Peters A Comparison Between Subjective and Objective Methods of Predicting Health Care Expenses to Support Consumers’ Health Insurance Plan Choice MDM Policy & Practice |
author_facet |
Mary C. Politi Enbal Shacham Abigail R. Barker Nerissa George Nageen Mir Sydney Philpott Jingxia Esther Liu Ellen Peters |
author_sort |
Mary C. Politi |
title |
A Comparison Between Subjective and Objective Methods of Predicting Health Care Expenses to Support Consumers’ Health Insurance Plan Choice |
title_short |
A Comparison Between Subjective and Objective Methods of Predicting Health Care Expenses to Support Consumers’ Health Insurance Plan Choice |
title_full |
A Comparison Between Subjective and Objective Methods of Predicting Health Care Expenses to Support Consumers’ Health Insurance Plan Choice |
title_fullStr |
A Comparison Between Subjective and Objective Methods of Predicting Health Care Expenses to Support Consumers’ Health Insurance Plan Choice |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Comparison Between Subjective and Objective Methods of Predicting Health Care Expenses to Support Consumers’ Health Insurance Plan Choice |
title_sort |
comparison between subjective and objective methods of predicting health care expenses to support consumers’ health insurance plan choice |
publisher |
SAGE Publishing |
series |
MDM Policy & Practice |
issn |
2381-4683 |
publishDate |
2018-06-01 |
description |
Objective. Numerous electronic tools help consumers select health insurance plans based on their estimated health care utilization. However, the best way to personalize these tools is unknown. The purpose of this study was to compare two common methods of personalizing health insurance plan displays: 1) quantitative healthcare utilization predictions using nationally representative Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) data and 2) subjective-health status predictions. We also explored their relations to self-reported health care utilization. Methods. Secondary data analysis was conducted with responses from 327 adults under age 65 considering health insurance enrollment in the Affordable Care Act (ACA) marketplace. Participants were asked to report their subjective health, health conditions, and demographic information. MEPS data were used to estimate predicted annual expenditures based on age, gender, and reported health conditions. Self-reported health care utilization was obtained for 120 participants at a 1-year follow-up. Results. MEPS-based predictions and subjective-health status were related ( P < 0.0001). However, MEPS-predicted ranges within subjective-health categories were large. Subjective health was a less reliable predictor of expenses among older adults (age × subjective health, P = 0.04). Neither significantly related to subsequent self-reported health care utilization ( P = 0.18, P = 0.92, respectively). Conclusions. Because MEPS data are nationally representative, they may approximate utilization better than subjective health, particularly among older adults. However, approximating health care utilization is difficult, especially among newly insured. Findings have implications for health insurance decision support tools that personalize plan displays based on cost estimates. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1177/2381468318781093 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT marycpoliti acomparisonbetweensubjectiveandobjectivemethodsofpredictinghealthcareexpensestosupportconsumershealthinsuranceplanchoice AT enbalshacham acomparisonbetweensubjectiveandobjectivemethodsofpredictinghealthcareexpensestosupportconsumershealthinsuranceplanchoice AT abigailrbarker acomparisonbetweensubjectiveandobjectivemethodsofpredictinghealthcareexpensestosupportconsumershealthinsuranceplanchoice AT nerissageorge acomparisonbetweensubjectiveandobjectivemethodsofpredictinghealthcareexpensestosupportconsumershealthinsuranceplanchoice AT nageenmir acomparisonbetweensubjectiveandobjectivemethodsofpredictinghealthcareexpensestosupportconsumershealthinsuranceplanchoice AT sydneyphilpott acomparisonbetweensubjectiveandobjectivemethodsofpredictinghealthcareexpensestosupportconsumershealthinsuranceplanchoice AT jingxiaestherliu acomparisonbetweensubjectiveandobjectivemethodsofpredictinghealthcareexpensestosupportconsumershealthinsuranceplanchoice AT ellenpeters acomparisonbetweensubjectiveandobjectivemethodsofpredictinghealthcareexpensestosupportconsumershealthinsuranceplanchoice AT marycpoliti comparisonbetweensubjectiveandobjectivemethodsofpredictinghealthcareexpensestosupportconsumershealthinsuranceplanchoice AT enbalshacham comparisonbetweensubjectiveandobjectivemethodsofpredictinghealthcareexpensestosupportconsumershealthinsuranceplanchoice AT abigailrbarker comparisonbetweensubjectiveandobjectivemethodsofpredictinghealthcareexpensestosupportconsumershealthinsuranceplanchoice AT nerissageorge comparisonbetweensubjectiveandobjectivemethodsofpredictinghealthcareexpensestosupportconsumershealthinsuranceplanchoice AT nageenmir comparisonbetweensubjectiveandobjectivemethodsofpredictinghealthcareexpensestosupportconsumershealthinsuranceplanchoice AT sydneyphilpott comparisonbetweensubjectiveandobjectivemethodsofpredictinghealthcareexpensestosupportconsumershealthinsuranceplanchoice AT jingxiaestherliu comparisonbetweensubjectiveandobjectivemethodsofpredictinghealthcareexpensestosupportconsumershealthinsuranceplanchoice AT ellenpeters comparisonbetweensubjectiveandobjectivemethodsofpredictinghealthcareexpensestosupportconsumershealthinsuranceplanchoice |
_version_ |
1724749674502422528 |