The Trade-off Between Housing Density and Sprawl Area: Minimizing Impacts to Carabid Beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae)
Increasing housing density has negative effects on native biodiversity. This implies that we should build at low density to conserve native species. However, for a given human population, low-density development must cover a large area, resulting in sprawl. A pertinent question is then, at what hous...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Resilience Alliance
2010-12-01
|
Series: | Ecology and Society |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/art12/ |
id |
doaj-c5395bfaeb454619b418de48d2de6321 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-c5395bfaeb454619b418de48d2de63212020-11-24T22:38:01ZengResilience AllianceEcology and Society1708-30872010-12-011541210.5751/ES-03635-1504123635The Trade-off Between Housing Density and Sprawl Area: Minimizing Impacts to Carabid Beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae)Sara A. Gagné0Lenore FahrigDepartment of Geography and Earth Sciences, University of North Carolina-CharlotteIncreasing housing density has negative effects on native biodiversity. This implies that we should build at low density to conserve native species. However, for a given human population, low-density development must cover a large area, resulting in sprawl. A pertinent question is then, at what housing density are the impacts of a given human population on native biodiversity minimized? We addressed this question with carabid beetles in Ottawa and Gatineau, Canada. First, we collected beetles at 22 sites representing a range of housing densities. We then used these data to estimate beetle abundance and species richness in hypothetical development scenarios representing the housing density/sprawl area trade-off. Our results suggest that clustering development at a high housing density minimizes the impacts of a given human population on carabid beetles. If these results are general across all forest taxa, then planning that favors densification rather than sprawl would minimize urbanization effects on forest biodiversity.http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/art12/development scenarioforest fragmentationforest taxaground beetlehousing densityresidential developmenturban sprawl |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Sara A. Gagné Lenore Fahrig |
spellingShingle |
Sara A. Gagné Lenore Fahrig The Trade-off Between Housing Density and Sprawl Area: Minimizing Impacts to Carabid Beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) Ecology and Society development scenario forest fragmentation forest taxa ground beetle housing density residential development urban sprawl |
author_facet |
Sara A. Gagné Lenore Fahrig |
author_sort |
Sara A. Gagné |
title |
The Trade-off Between Housing Density and Sprawl Area: Minimizing Impacts to Carabid Beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) |
title_short |
The Trade-off Between Housing Density and Sprawl Area: Minimizing Impacts to Carabid Beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) |
title_full |
The Trade-off Between Housing Density and Sprawl Area: Minimizing Impacts to Carabid Beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) |
title_fullStr |
The Trade-off Between Housing Density and Sprawl Area: Minimizing Impacts to Carabid Beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Trade-off Between Housing Density and Sprawl Area: Minimizing Impacts to Carabid Beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) |
title_sort |
trade-off between housing density and sprawl area: minimizing impacts to carabid beetles (coleoptera: carabidae) |
publisher |
Resilience Alliance |
series |
Ecology and Society |
issn |
1708-3087 |
publishDate |
2010-12-01 |
description |
Increasing housing density has negative effects on native biodiversity. This implies that we should build at low density to conserve native species. However, for a given human population, low-density development must cover a large area, resulting in sprawl. A pertinent question is then, at what housing density are the impacts of a given human population on native biodiversity minimized? We addressed this question with carabid beetles in Ottawa and Gatineau, Canada. First, we collected beetles at 22 sites representing a range of housing densities. We then used these data to estimate beetle abundance and species richness in hypothetical development scenarios representing the housing density/sprawl area trade-off. Our results suggest that clustering development at a high housing density minimizes the impacts of a given human population on carabid beetles. If these results are general across all forest taxa, then planning that favors densification rather than sprawl would minimize urbanization effects on forest biodiversity. |
topic |
development scenario forest fragmentation forest taxa ground beetle housing density residential development urban sprawl |
url |
http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/art12/ |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT saraagagne thetradeoffbetweenhousingdensityandsprawlareaminimizingimpactstocarabidbeetlescoleopteracarabidae AT lenorefahrig thetradeoffbetweenhousingdensityandsprawlareaminimizingimpactstocarabidbeetlescoleopteracarabidae AT saraagagne tradeoffbetweenhousingdensityandsprawlareaminimizingimpactstocarabidbeetlescoleopteracarabidae AT lenorefahrig tradeoffbetweenhousingdensityandsprawlareaminimizingimpactstocarabidbeetlescoleopteracarabidae |
_version_ |
1716492225336049664 |