The Trade-off Between Housing Density and Sprawl Area: Minimizing Impacts to Carabid Beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae)

Increasing housing density has negative effects on native biodiversity. This implies that we should build at low density to conserve native species. However, for a given human population, low-density development must cover a large area, resulting in sprawl. A pertinent question is then, at what hous...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sara A. Gagné, Lenore Fahrig
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Resilience Alliance 2010-12-01
Series:Ecology and Society
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/art12/
id doaj-c5395bfaeb454619b418de48d2de6321
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c5395bfaeb454619b418de48d2de63212020-11-24T22:38:01ZengResilience AllianceEcology and Society1708-30872010-12-011541210.5751/ES-03635-1504123635The Trade-off Between Housing Density and Sprawl Area: Minimizing Impacts to Carabid Beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae)Sara A. Gagné0Lenore FahrigDepartment of Geography and Earth Sciences, University of North Carolina-CharlotteIncreasing housing density has negative effects on native biodiversity. This implies that we should build at low density to conserve native species. However, for a given human population, low-density development must cover a large area, resulting in sprawl. A pertinent question is then, at what housing density are the impacts of a given human population on native biodiversity minimized? We addressed this question with carabid beetles in Ottawa and Gatineau, Canada. First, we collected beetles at 22 sites representing a range of housing densities. We then used these data to estimate beetle abundance and species richness in hypothetical development scenarios representing the housing density/sprawl area trade-off. Our results suggest that clustering development at a high housing density minimizes the impacts of a given human population on carabid beetles. If these results are general across all forest taxa, then planning that favors densification rather than sprawl would minimize urbanization effects on forest biodiversity.http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/art12/development scenarioforest fragmentationforest taxaground beetlehousing densityresidential developmenturban sprawl
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sara A. Gagné
Lenore Fahrig
spellingShingle Sara A. Gagné
Lenore Fahrig
The Trade-off Between Housing Density and Sprawl Area: Minimizing Impacts to Carabid Beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae)
Ecology and Society
development scenario
forest fragmentation
forest taxa
ground beetle
housing density
residential development
urban sprawl
author_facet Sara A. Gagné
Lenore Fahrig
author_sort Sara A. Gagné
title The Trade-off Between Housing Density and Sprawl Area: Minimizing Impacts to Carabid Beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae)
title_short The Trade-off Between Housing Density and Sprawl Area: Minimizing Impacts to Carabid Beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae)
title_full The Trade-off Between Housing Density and Sprawl Area: Minimizing Impacts to Carabid Beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae)
title_fullStr The Trade-off Between Housing Density and Sprawl Area: Minimizing Impacts to Carabid Beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae)
title_full_unstemmed The Trade-off Between Housing Density and Sprawl Area: Minimizing Impacts to Carabid Beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae)
title_sort trade-off between housing density and sprawl area: minimizing impacts to carabid beetles (coleoptera: carabidae)
publisher Resilience Alliance
series Ecology and Society
issn 1708-3087
publishDate 2010-12-01
description Increasing housing density has negative effects on native biodiversity. This implies that we should build at low density to conserve native species. However, for a given human population, low-density development must cover a large area, resulting in sprawl. A pertinent question is then, at what housing density are the impacts of a given human population on native biodiversity minimized? We addressed this question with carabid beetles in Ottawa and Gatineau, Canada. First, we collected beetles at 22 sites representing a range of housing densities. We then used these data to estimate beetle abundance and species richness in hypothetical development scenarios representing the housing density/sprawl area trade-off. Our results suggest that clustering development at a high housing density minimizes the impacts of a given human population on carabid beetles. If these results are general across all forest taxa, then planning that favors densification rather than sprawl would minimize urbanization effects on forest biodiversity.
topic development scenario
forest fragmentation
forest taxa
ground beetle
housing density
residential development
urban sprawl
url http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/art12/
work_keys_str_mv AT saraagagne thetradeoffbetweenhousingdensityandsprawlareaminimizingimpactstocarabidbeetlescoleopteracarabidae
AT lenorefahrig thetradeoffbetweenhousingdensityandsprawlareaminimizingimpactstocarabidbeetlescoleopteracarabidae
AT saraagagne tradeoffbetweenhousingdensityandsprawlareaminimizingimpactstocarabidbeetlescoleopteracarabidae
AT lenorefahrig tradeoffbetweenhousingdensityandsprawlareaminimizingimpactstocarabidbeetlescoleopteracarabidae
_version_ 1716492225336049664