Aerosol generation during cadaveric simulation of otologic surgery and live cochlear implantation

Abstract Objective The risk of SARS‐CoV‐2 transmission to healthcare workers through airborne aerosolization during otologic surgery has not been characterized. The objective of this study was to describe and quantify the aerosol generation during common otologic procedures in both cadaveric surgica...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dhruv Sharma, Vincent J. Campiti, Michael J. Ye, Mohamad Saltagi, Aaron E. Carroll, Jonathan Y. Ting, Elisa A. Illing, Jae Hong Park, Rick F. Nelson, Sarah J. Burgin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-02-01
Series:Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/lio2.506
id doaj-c55fc0b8729f412084ad5e2ef2a3e7d1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c55fc0b8729f412084ad5e2ef2a3e7d12021-02-15T12:54:20ZengWileyLaryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology2378-80382021-02-016112913610.1002/lio2.506Aerosol generation during cadaveric simulation of otologic surgery and live cochlear implantationDhruv Sharma0Vincent J. Campiti1Michael J. Ye2Mohamad Saltagi3Aaron E. Carroll4Jonathan Y. Ting5Elisa A. Illing6Jae Hong Park7Rick F. Nelson8Sarah J. Burgin9Department of Otolaryngology – Head & Neck Surgery Indiana University School of Medicine Indianapolis Indiana USASchool of Medicine Indiana University Indianapolis Indiana USADepartment of Otolaryngology – Head & Neck Surgery Indiana University School of Medicine Indianapolis Indiana USADepartment of Otolaryngology – Head & Neck Surgery Indiana University School of Medicine Indianapolis Indiana USASchool of Medicine Indiana University Indianapolis Indiana USADepartment of Otolaryngology – Head & Neck Surgery Indiana University School of Medicine Indianapolis Indiana USADepartment of Otolaryngology – Head & Neck Surgery Indiana University School of Medicine Indianapolis Indiana USASchool of Health Sciences Purdue University West Lafayette Indiana USADepartment of Otolaryngology – Head & Neck Surgery Indiana University School of Medicine Indianapolis Indiana USADepartment of Otolaryngology – Head & Neck Surgery Indiana University School of Medicine Indianapolis Indiana USAAbstract Objective The risk of SARS‐CoV‐2 transmission to healthcare workers through airborne aerosolization during otologic surgery has not been characterized. The objective of this study was to describe and quantify the aerosol generation during common otologic procedures in both cadaveric surgical simulation and live patient surgery. Methods The number concentrations of generated aerosols in the particle size range of 0.30 to 10.0 μm were quantified using an optical particle sizer during both a cadaveric simulation of routine otologic procedures as well as cochlear implant surgery on live patients in the operating room. Results In the cadaveric simulation, temporalis fascia graft harvest using cold techniques (without electrocautery) (n = 4) did not generate aerosols above baseline concentrations. Tympanoplasty (n = 3) and mastoidectomy (n = 3) both produced statistically significant increases in concentrations of aerosols (P < 0.05), predominantly submicron particles (< 1.0 μm). High‐speed, powered drilling of the temporal bone during mastoidectomy with a Multi Flute cutting burr resulted in higher peak concentrations and greater number of spikes in aerosols than with a diamond burr. In the operating room, spikes in aerosols occurred during both cochlear implant surgeries. Conclusion In the cadaveric simulation, temporalis fascia graft harvest without electrocautery did not generate aerosol levels above baseline, while significant aerosol levels were generated during mastoidectomy and to a much less degree during tympanoplasty. Aerosol spikes were appreciated during cochlear implantation surgery in live patients. Level of Evidence 2.https://doi.org/10.1002/lio2.506Aerosol‐Generating ProcedureCOVID‐19MastoidectomyOtologic SurgeryTympanoplasty
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Dhruv Sharma
Vincent J. Campiti
Michael J. Ye
Mohamad Saltagi
Aaron E. Carroll
Jonathan Y. Ting
Elisa A. Illing
Jae Hong Park
Rick F. Nelson
Sarah J. Burgin
spellingShingle Dhruv Sharma
Vincent J. Campiti
Michael J. Ye
Mohamad Saltagi
Aaron E. Carroll
Jonathan Y. Ting
Elisa A. Illing
Jae Hong Park
Rick F. Nelson
Sarah J. Burgin
Aerosol generation during cadaveric simulation of otologic surgery and live cochlear implantation
Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
Aerosol‐Generating Procedure
COVID‐19
Mastoidectomy
Otologic Surgery
Tympanoplasty
author_facet Dhruv Sharma
Vincent J. Campiti
Michael J. Ye
Mohamad Saltagi
Aaron E. Carroll
Jonathan Y. Ting
Elisa A. Illing
Jae Hong Park
Rick F. Nelson
Sarah J. Burgin
author_sort Dhruv Sharma
title Aerosol generation during cadaveric simulation of otologic surgery and live cochlear implantation
title_short Aerosol generation during cadaveric simulation of otologic surgery and live cochlear implantation
title_full Aerosol generation during cadaveric simulation of otologic surgery and live cochlear implantation
title_fullStr Aerosol generation during cadaveric simulation of otologic surgery and live cochlear implantation
title_full_unstemmed Aerosol generation during cadaveric simulation of otologic surgery and live cochlear implantation
title_sort aerosol generation during cadaveric simulation of otologic surgery and live cochlear implantation
publisher Wiley
series Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
issn 2378-8038
publishDate 2021-02-01
description Abstract Objective The risk of SARS‐CoV‐2 transmission to healthcare workers through airborne aerosolization during otologic surgery has not been characterized. The objective of this study was to describe and quantify the aerosol generation during common otologic procedures in both cadaveric surgical simulation and live patient surgery. Methods The number concentrations of generated aerosols in the particle size range of 0.30 to 10.0 μm were quantified using an optical particle sizer during both a cadaveric simulation of routine otologic procedures as well as cochlear implant surgery on live patients in the operating room. Results In the cadaveric simulation, temporalis fascia graft harvest using cold techniques (without electrocautery) (n = 4) did not generate aerosols above baseline concentrations. Tympanoplasty (n = 3) and mastoidectomy (n = 3) both produced statistically significant increases in concentrations of aerosols (P < 0.05), predominantly submicron particles (< 1.0 μm). High‐speed, powered drilling of the temporal bone during mastoidectomy with a Multi Flute cutting burr resulted in higher peak concentrations and greater number of spikes in aerosols than with a diamond burr. In the operating room, spikes in aerosols occurred during both cochlear implant surgeries. Conclusion In the cadaveric simulation, temporalis fascia graft harvest without electrocautery did not generate aerosol levels above baseline, while significant aerosol levels were generated during mastoidectomy and to a much less degree during tympanoplasty. Aerosol spikes were appreciated during cochlear implantation surgery in live patients. Level of Evidence 2.
topic Aerosol‐Generating Procedure
COVID‐19
Mastoidectomy
Otologic Surgery
Tympanoplasty
url https://doi.org/10.1002/lio2.506
work_keys_str_mv AT dhruvsharma aerosolgenerationduringcadavericsimulationofotologicsurgeryandlivecochlearimplantation
AT vincentjcampiti aerosolgenerationduringcadavericsimulationofotologicsurgeryandlivecochlearimplantation
AT michaeljye aerosolgenerationduringcadavericsimulationofotologicsurgeryandlivecochlearimplantation
AT mohamadsaltagi aerosolgenerationduringcadavericsimulationofotologicsurgeryandlivecochlearimplantation
AT aaronecarroll aerosolgenerationduringcadavericsimulationofotologicsurgeryandlivecochlearimplantation
AT jonathanyting aerosolgenerationduringcadavericsimulationofotologicsurgeryandlivecochlearimplantation
AT elisaailling aerosolgenerationduringcadavericsimulationofotologicsurgeryandlivecochlearimplantation
AT jaehongpark aerosolgenerationduringcadavericsimulationofotologicsurgeryandlivecochlearimplantation
AT rickfnelson aerosolgenerationduringcadavericsimulationofotologicsurgeryandlivecochlearimplantation
AT sarahjburgin aerosolgenerationduringcadavericsimulationofotologicsurgeryandlivecochlearimplantation
_version_ 1724269006257389568