A novel photonumeric hand grading scale for hand rejuvenation

Background Few scales are currently available to evaluate changes in hand volume. We aimed to develop a hand grading scale for quantitative assessments of dorsal hand volume with additional consideration of changes in skin texture; to validate and prove the precision and reproducibility of the new s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jong Hun Lee, Yean Su Choi, Eun Soo Park, Jong Seo Kim, Moon Seok Kang, Hwa Young Oh, So Dam Yang, Seon Hui Jeon
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons 2019-07-01
Series:Archives of Plastic Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.e-aps.org/upload/pdf/aps-2019-00521.pdf
Description
Summary:Background Few scales are currently available to evaluate changes in hand volume. We aimed to develop a hand grading scale for quantitative assessments of dorsal hand volume with additional consideration of changes in skin texture; to validate and prove the precision and reproducibility of the new scale; and to demonstrate the presence of clinically significant differences between grades on the scale. Methods Five experienced plastic surgeons developed the Hand Volume Rating Scale (HVRS) and rated 91 images. Another five plastic surgeons validated the scale using 50 randomly selected images. Intra- and inter-rater agreement was calculated using the weighted kappa statistic and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Paired images were also evaluated to verify whether the scale reflected clinical differences. Results The intra-rater agreement was 0.95 (95% confidence interval, 0.922–0.974). The interrater ICCs were excellent (first rating, 0.94; second rating, 0.94). Image pairs that differed by 1, 2, and 3 grades were considered to contain clinically relevant differences in 80%, 100%, and 100% of cases, respectively, while 84% of image pairs of the same grade were found not to show clinically relevant differences. This confirmed that the scale of the HVRS corresponded to clinically relevant distinctions. Conclusions The scale was proven to be precise, reproducible, and reflective of clinical differences.
ISSN:2234-6163
2234-6171