Buddhism and Confucianism in the Tangut State: A Comparative Analysis, with Special Attention to the Use of the Term Xiang
From a generic perspective, the Tangut ideological system can be represented as the conflation of three major factors: in the course of their history, the Tanguts were open to ideological inflows originating mainly on the Central Plains (1, Buddhism and Confucianism) and the Tibetan Plateau (2, Bud...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
CERES / KHK Bochum
2019-12-01
|
Series: | Entangled Religions - Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Religious Contact and Transfer |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://er.ceres.rub.de/index.php/ER/article/view/8472 |
id |
doaj-c5a52eb07c4947e8b412a43c945f5353 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-c5a52eb07c4947e8b412a43c945f53532020-11-25T02:36:56ZengCERES / KHK BochumEntangled Religions - Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Religious Contact and Transfer 2363-66962019-12-01810.13154/er.8.2019.8472Buddhism and Confucianism in the Tangut State: A Comparative Analysis, with Special Attention to the Use of the Term XiangKirill Solonin From a generic perspective, the Tangut ideological system can be represented as the conflation of three major factors: in the course of their history, the Tanguts were open to ideological inflows originating mainly on the Central Plains (1, Buddhism and Confucianism) and the Tibetan Plateau (2, Buddhism). These two inflows encountered the Tangut indigenous ideology (3), which had obviously emerged before the proclamation of the Tangut State, and is scarcely known. These elements developed into a unique amalgamation provisionally identified as ‘Tangut ideology,’ or the ‘Tangut tradition.’ This ‘tradition’ cannot be reconstructed in its entirety: our sources are limited to the surviving textual materials in the Tangut language and scattered evidence in a variety of Chinese sources, and, to an even lesser extent, in the Tibetan chronicles. This paper seeks to deal with just one aspect of the multifaceted Tangut ideological system: the relation between Buddhism and Confucianism in the Tangut State. The main conclusion is that despite the fact that the role of Confucianism is not clearly evident in existing sources, the ultimate importance of Confucian influence is the formation of the Tangut *wen* 文. https://er.ceres.rub.de/index.php/ER/article/view/8472Tangut writing systemBuddhismChinese learningTangut stateConfucianismTangut rituals |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Kirill Solonin |
spellingShingle |
Kirill Solonin Buddhism and Confucianism in the Tangut State: A Comparative Analysis, with Special Attention to the Use of the Term Xiang Entangled Religions - Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Religious Contact and Transfer Tangut writing system Buddhism Chinese learning Tangut state Confucianism Tangut rituals |
author_facet |
Kirill Solonin |
author_sort |
Kirill Solonin |
title |
Buddhism and Confucianism in the Tangut State: A Comparative Analysis, with Special Attention to the Use of the Term Xiang |
title_short |
Buddhism and Confucianism in the Tangut State: A Comparative Analysis, with Special Attention to the Use of the Term Xiang |
title_full |
Buddhism and Confucianism in the Tangut State: A Comparative Analysis, with Special Attention to the Use of the Term Xiang |
title_fullStr |
Buddhism and Confucianism in the Tangut State: A Comparative Analysis, with Special Attention to the Use of the Term Xiang |
title_full_unstemmed |
Buddhism and Confucianism in the Tangut State: A Comparative Analysis, with Special Attention to the Use of the Term Xiang |
title_sort |
buddhism and confucianism in the tangut state: a comparative analysis, with special attention to the use of the term xiang |
publisher |
CERES / KHK Bochum |
series |
Entangled Religions - Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Religious Contact and Transfer |
issn |
2363-6696 |
publishDate |
2019-12-01 |
description |
From a generic perspective, the Tangut ideological system can be represented as the conflation of three major factors: in the course of their history, the Tanguts were open to ideological inflows originating mainly on the Central Plains (1, Buddhism and Confucianism) and the Tibetan Plateau (2, Buddhism). These two inflows encountered the Tangut indigenous ideology (3), which had obviously emerged before the proclamation of the Tangut State, and is scarcely known. These elements developed into a unique amalgamation provisionally identified as ‘Tangut ideology,’ or the ‘Tangut tradition.’ This ‘tradition’ cannot be reconstructed in its entirety: our sources are limited to the surviving textual materials in the Tangut language and scattered evidence in a variety of Chinese sources, and, to an even lesser extent, in the Tibetan chronicles. This paper seeks to deal with just one aspect of the multifaceted Tangut ideological system: the relation between Buddhism and Confucianism in the Tangut State. The main conclusion is that despite the fact that the role of Confucianism is not clearly evident in existing sources, the ultimate importance of Confucian influence is the formation of the Tangut *wen* 文.
|
topic |
Tangut writing system Buddhism Chinese learning Tangut state Confucianism Tangut rituals |
url |
https://er.ceres.rub.de/index.php/ER/article/view/8472 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT kirillsolonin buddhismandconfucianisminthetangutstateacomparativeanalysiswithspecialattentiontotheuseofthetermxiang |
_version_ |
1724797860627611648 |