Biofuels Barrier Properties of Polyamide 6 and High Density Polyethylene

In this paper, a comparison of the biofuels barrier properties of PolyAmide 6 (PA6) and High Density PolyEthylene (HDPE) is presented. Model fuels were prepared as mixtures of toluene, isooctane and ethanol, the ethanol volume fraction varying between 0% and 100%. Barrier properties were determined...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fillot L.-A., Ghiringhelli S., Prebet C., Rossi S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2015-02-01
Series:Oil & Gas Science and Technology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.2516/ogst/2013213
id doaj-c5afb73d506c4cdd9f6cea375aeb1957
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c5afb73d506c4cdd9f6cea375aeb19572021-02-02T02:21:24ZengEDP SciencesOil & Gas Science and Technology1294-44751953-81892015-02-0170233535110.2516/ogst/2013213ogst130067Biofuels Barrier Properties of Polyamide 6 and High Density PolyethyleneFillot L.-A.Ghiringhelli S.Prebet C.Rossi S.In this paper, a comparison of the biofuels barrier properties of PolyAmide 6 (PA6) and High Density PolyEthylene (HDPE) is presented. Model fuels were prepared as mixtures of toluene, isooctane and ethanol, the ethanol volume fraction varying between 0% and 100%. Barrier properties were determined at 40°C by gravimetric techniques or gas chromatography measurements, and it was shown that polyamide 6 permeability is lower than that of polyethylene on a wide range of ethanol contents up to 85% of ethanol (E85) in the biofuel, permeability of PA6 being 100 times lower than that of HDPE for low ethanol content fuels (E5, E0). The time-lags were also compared, and on the whole range of ethanol contents, HDPE permeation kinetics appears to be much faster than that of PA6, the time lag for a 1 mm thick specimens in presence of E10 being 50 days for PA6 and 0.5 days for HDPE. The compositions of the solvent fluxes were analyzed by FID gas chromatography, and it turned out that the solvent flux was mainly made up of ethanol (minimum 95%) in the case of PA6, whereas in the case of HDPE, solvent flux was mainly made up of hydrocarbons. The implication of this difference in the solvent flux composition is discussed in the present article, and a side effect called the “fuel exhaustion process” is presented. The influence of the sample thickness was then studied, and for the different biofuels compositions, the pervaporation kinetics of polyamide 6 appeared to evolve with the square of the thickness, a long transitory regime being highlighted in the case of PA6. This result implies that the time needed to characterize the steady state permeability of thick PA6 parts such as fuel tanks can be very long (one year or more), this duration being far superior to the Euros 5 or Euro 6 standard emission measurements time scale. The influence of temperature on the permeability was finally assessed, and the activation energy that is the signature of the temperature dependence of the barrier property turned out to be similar for the different biofuels compositions.http://dx.doi.org/10.2516/ogst/2013213
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Fillot L.-A.
Ghiringhelli S.
Prebet C.
Rossi S.
spellingShingle Fillot L.-A.
Ghiringhelli S.
Prebet C.
Rossi S.
Biofuels Barrier Properties of Polyamide 6 and High Density Polyethylene
Oil & Gas Science and Technology
author_facet Fillot L.-A.
Ghiringhelli S.
Prebet C.
Rossi S.
author_sort Fillot L.-A.
title Biofuels Barrier Properties of Polyamide 6 and High Density Polyethylene
title_short Biofuels Barrier Properties of Polyamide 6 and High Density Polyethylene
title_full Biofuels Barrier Properties of Polyamide 6 and High Density Polyethylene
title_fullStr Biofuels Barrier Properties of Polyamide 6 and High Density Polyethylene
title_full_unstemmed Biofuels Barrier Properties of Polyamide 6 and High Density Polyethylene
title_sort biofuels barrier properties of polyamide 6 and high density polyethylene
publisher EDP Sciences
series Oil & Gas Science and Technology
issn 1294-4475
1953-8189
publishDate 2015-02-01
description In this paper, a comparison of the biofuels barrier properties of PolyAmide 6 (PA6) and High Density PolyEthylene (HDPE) is presented. Model fuels were prepared as mixtures of toluene, isooctane and ethanol, the ethanol volume fraction varying between 0% and 100%. Barrier properties were determined at 40°C by gravimetric techniques or gas chromatography measurements, and it was shown that polyamide 6 permeability is lower than that of polyethylene on a wide range of ethanol contents up to 85% of ethanol (E85) in the biofuel, permeability of PA6 being 100 times lower than that of HDPE for low ethanol content fuels (E5, E0). The time-lags were also compared, and on the whole range of ethanol contents, HDPE permeation kinetics appears to be much faster than that of PA6, the time lag for a 1 mm thick specimens in presence of E10 being 50 days for PA6 and 0.5 days for HDPE. The compositions of the solvent fluxes were analyzed by FID gas chromatography, and it turned out that the solvent flux was mainly made up of ethanol (minimum 95%) in the case of PA6, whereas in the case of HDPE, solvent flux was mainly made up of hydrocarbons. The implication of this difference in the solvent flux composition is discussed in the present article, and a side effect called the “fuel exhaustion process” is presented. The influence of the sample thickness was then studied, and for the different biofuels compositions, the pervaporation kinetics of polyamide 6 appeared to evolve with the square of the thickness, a long transitory regime being highlighted in the case of PA6. This result implies that the time needed to characterize the steady state permeability of thick PA6 parts such as fuel tanks can be very long (one year or more), this duration being far superior to the Euros 5 or Euro 6 standard emission measurements time scale. The influence of temperature on the permeability was finally assessed, and the activation energy that is the signature of the temperature dependence of the barrier property turned out to be similar for the different biofuels compositions.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.2516/ogst/2013213
work_keys_str_mv AT fillotla biofuelsbarrierpropertiesofpolyamide6andhighdensitypolyethylene
AT ghiringhellis biofuelsbarrierpropertiesofpolyamide6andhighdensitypolyethylene
AT prebetc biofuelsbarrierpropertiesofpolyamide6andhighdensitypolyethylene
AT rossis biofuelsbarrierpropertiesofpolyamide6andhighdensitypolyethylene
_version_ 1724310015154585600