The MATISSE Trial–A Critique

U.K. national guidelines for the treatment of schizophrenia recommend art therapy among other approaches. However, a recent major trial called MATISSE (Multicenter evaluation of Art Therapy in Schizophrenia: Systematic Evaluation) suggests that art therapy may not be helpful. The purpose of the pres...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sue Holttum, Val Huet
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2014-04-01
Series:SAGE Open
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014532930
id doaj-c5d3001c52114038881c88f4d0ef4bfc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c5d3001c52114038881c88f4d0ef4bfc2020-11-25T03:08:24ZengSAGE PublishingSAGE Open2158-24402014-04-01410.1177/215824401453293010.1177_2158244014532930The MATISSE Trial–A CritiqueSue Holttum0Val Huet1Canterbury Christ Church University, Southborough, UKBritish Association of Art Therapists, London, UKU.K. national guidelines for the treatment of schizophrenia recommend art therapy among other approaches. However, a recent major trial called MATISSE (Multicenter evaluation of Art Therapy in Schizophrenia: Systematic Evaluation) suggests that art therapy may not be helpful. The purpose of the present study was to explore reasons for the MATISSE trial findings. A critical review of the MATISSE trial drawing on six papers reporting on the trial and its processes was performed. The MATISSE trial appeared to have weak conceptualization of the mechanisms for change, lack of piloting, incomplete process and subgroup analyses, and inappropriate assumptions about the generalizability of findings. The MATISSE trial’s conclusion that art therapy is of no value to people with a diagnosis of schizophrenia is unwarranted. More account should be taken of extant quality guidelines for complex interventions, including proposed change mechanisms, piloting, process analyses, variations in practice and contexts, and the effect of randomization on generalizability.https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014532930
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sue Holttum
Val Huet
spellingShingle Sue Holttum
Val Huet
The MATISSE Trial–A Critique
SAGE Open
author_facet Sue Holttum
Val Huet
author_sort Sue Holttum
title The MATISSE Trial–A Critique
title_short The MATISSE Trial–A Critique
title_full The MATISSE Trial–A Critique
title_fullStr The MATISSE Trial–A Critique
title_full_unstemmed The MATISSE Trial–A Critique
title_sort matisse trial–a critique
publisher SAGE Publishing
series SAGE Open
issn 2158-2440
publishDate 2014-04-01
description U.K. national guidelines for the treatment of schizophrenia recommend art therapy among other approaches. However, a recent major trial called MATISSE (Multicenter evaluation of Art Therapy in Schizophrenia: Systematic Evaluation) suggests that art therapy may not be helpful. The purpose of the present study was to explore reasons for the MATISSE trial findings. A critical review of the MATISSE trial drawing on six papers reporting on the trial and its processes was performed. The MATISSE trial appeared to have weak conceptualization of the mechanisms for change, lack of piloting, incomplete process and subgroup analyses, and inappropriate assumptions about the generalizability of findings. The MATISSE trial’s conclusion that art therapy is of no value to people with a diagnosis of schizophrenia is unwarranted. More account should be taken of extant quality guidelines for complex interventions, including proposed change mechanisms, piloting, process analyses, variations in practice and contexts, and the effect of randomization on generalizability.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014532930
work_keys_str_mv AT sueholttum thematissetrialacritique
AT valhuet thematissetrialacritique
AT sueholttum matissetrialacritique
AT valhuet matissetrialacritique
_version_ 1724666725553668096