Improving Infrastructure Installation Planning Processes using Procedural Modeling
Time and costs are often the most critical constraints in implementing a development impact fee (DIF) for local infrastructure installation planning in South Korea. For this reason, drafting quality plan alternatives and calculating precise DIFs for improvement remain challenging. This study propose...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2020-02-01
|
Series: | Land |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/9/2/48 |
id |
doaj-c5fa4c5faf594cb68984a5425c9d5d43 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-c5fa4c5faf594cb68984a5425c9d5d432020-11-25T01:30:41ZengMDPI AGLand2073-445X2020-02-01924810.3390/land9020048land9020048Improving Infrastructure Installation Planning Processes using Procedural ModelingNae-Young Choei0Hyungkyoo Kim1Seonghun Kim2Department of Urban Design and Planning, Hongik University, Seoul 04066, KoreaDepartment of Urban Design and Planning, Hongik University, Seoul 04066, KoreaResearch Institute of Science and Technology, Hongik University, Seoul 04066, KoreaTime and costs are often the most critical constraints in implementing a development impact fee (DIF) for local infrastructure installation planning in South Korea. For this reason, drafting quality plan alternatives and calculating precise DIFs for improvement remain challenging. This study proposes an application of a procedural modeling method using CityEngine as an alternative to traditional methods, which rely on AutoCAD. A virtual low-density suburban development project in Jeju, South Korea was used to compare the workability of the two methods. The findings suggest that procedural modeling outperforms the other approach by significantly reducing the number of steps and commands required in the planning process. This paper also argues that procedural modeling provides real-time 2- and 3-dimensional modeling and design evaluation and allows for a more efficient assessment of plan quality and calculation of DIF. We also argue for the need to diffuse procedural modeling to better support local planning practices.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/9/2/48infrastructure installation planningprocedural modelingdevelopment impact feesjeju |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Nae-Young Choei Hyungkyoo Kim Seonghun Kim |
spellingShingle |
Nae-Young Choei Hyungkyoo Kim Seonghun Kim Improving Infrastructure Installation Planning Processes using Procedural Modeling Land infrastructure installation planning procedural modeling development impact fees jeju |
author_facet |
Nae-Young Choei Hyungkyoo Kim Seonghun Kim |
author_sort |
Nae-Young Choei |
title |
Improving Infrastructure Installation Planning Processes using Procedural Modeling |
title_short |
Improving Infrastructure Installation Planning Processes using Procedural Modeling |
title_full |
Improving Infrastructure Installation Planning Processes using Procedural Modeling |
title_fullStr |
Improving Infrastructure Installation Planning Processes using Procedural Modeling |
title_full_unstemmed |
Improving Infrastructure Installation Planning Processes using Procedural Modeling |
title_sort |
improving infrastructure installation planning processes using procedural modeling |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Land |
issn |
2073-445X |
publishDate |
2020-02-01 |
description |
Time and costs are often the most critical constraints in implementing a development impact fee (DIF) for local infrastructure installation planning in South Korea. For this reason, drafting quality plan alternatives and calculating precise DIFs for improvement remain challenging. This study proposes an application of a procedural modeling method using CityEngine as an alternative to traditional methods, which rely on AutoCAD. A virtual low-density suburban development project in Jeju, South Korea was used to compare the workability of the two methods. The findings suggest that procedural modeling outperforms the other approach by significantly reducing the number of steps and commands required in the planning process. This paper also argues that procedural modeling provides real-time 2- and 3-dimensional modeling and design evaluation and allows for a more efficient assessment of plan quality and calculation of DIF. We also argue for the need to diffuse procedural modeling to better support local planning practices. |
topic |
infrastructure installation planning procedural modeling development impact fees jeju |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/9/2/48 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT naeyoungchoei improvinginfrastructureinstallationplanningprocessesusingproceduralmodeling AT hyungkyookim improvinginfrastructureinstallationplanningprocessesusingproceduralmodeling AT seonghunkim improvinginfrastructureinstallationplanningprocessesusingproceduralmodeling |
_version_ |
1725090616845533184 |