Summary: | <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p><it>Thiomonas </it>strains are ubiquitous in arsenic-contaminated environments. Differences between <it>Thiomonas </it>strains in the way they have adapted and respond to arsenic have never been studied in detail. For this purpose, five <it>Thiomonas </it>strains, that are interesting in terms of arsenic metabolism were selected: <it>T. arsenivorans</it>, <it>Thiomonas </it>spp. WJ68 and 3As are able to oxidise As(III), while <it>Thiomonas </it>sp. Ynys1 and <it>T. perometabolis </it>are not. Moreover, <it>T. arsenivorans </it>and 3As present interesting physiological traits, in particular that these strains are able to use As(III) as an electron donor.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The metabolism of carbon and arsenic was compared in the five <it>Thiomonas </it>strains belonging to two distinct phylogenetic groups. Greater physiological differences were found between these strains than might have been suggested by 16S rRNA/<it>rpoA </it>gene phylogeny, especially regarding arsenic metabolism. Physiologically, <it>T. perometabolis </it>and Ynys1 were unable to oxidise As(III) and were less arsenic-resistant than the other strains. Genetically, they appeared to lack the <it>aox </it>arsenic-oxidising genes and carried only a single <it>ars </it>arsenic resistance operon. <it>Thiomonas arsenivorans </it>belonged to a distinct phylogenetic group and increased its autotrophic metabolism when arsenic concentration increased. Differential proteomic analysis revealed that in <it>T. arsenivorans</it>, the <it>rbc</it>/<it>cbb </it>genes involved in the assimilation of inorganic carbon were induced in the presence of arsenic, whereas these genes were repressed in <it>Thiomonas </it>sp. 3As.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Taken together, these results show that these closely related bacteria differ substantially in their response to arsenic, amongst other factors, and suggest different relationships between carbon assimilation and arsenic metabolism.</p>
|