Welfare Markets and the Democracy of European Integration

(Series Information) European Papers - A Journal on Law and Integration, 2016 1(3), 783-790 | Overview | (Abstract) Since 2009, austerity and the pressure for decreasing public spending in Europe have strongly targeted welfare services such as transport, healthcare, social services, culture and educ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Amandine Crespy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: European Papers (www.europeanpapers.eu) 2017-01-01
Series:European Papers
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.europeanpapers.eu/en/e-journal/welfare-markets-and-the-democracy-of-european-integration
id doaj-c61a995829a54b62b3f59507054176b3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c61a995829a54b62b3f59507054176b32021-01-03T17:53:15ZengEuropean Papers (www.europeanpapers.eu)European Papers2499-82492017-01-012016 1378379010.15166/2499-8249/104Welfare Markets and the Democracy of European IntegrationAmandine Crespy0Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB)(Series Information) European Papers - A Journal on Law and Integration, 2016 1(3), 783-790 | Overview | (Abstract) Since 2009, austerity and the pressure for decreasing public spending in Europe have strongly targeted welfare services such as transport, healthcare, social services, culture and education, etc. In order to understand the current situation of welfare services in Europe today, one must take a step back and look at the broader development what has been the role of the EU in the marketization of public services? And to what extent has contestation mattered in that regard? From an institutionalist point of view, the EU has exhibited a bias towards negative integration, that is policies relying on competition and marketization. This is explained by the building the Single Market through liberalization directives and the institutional strength of competition law. Yet, legal and institutional factors (including case law) do not have a deterministic, mechanic effect on policy making. One needs to look at the political battles surrounding welfare services, and especially mobilization of left wing political actors (including radical left or social democratic parties, trade unions, and associations from the global justice movement) against marketization policies. Main contentious episodes have included protest against the EU Services directive, the campaign calling for an EU Framework directive on welfare services, and the global mobilization against the General Agreement on Trade in Services. The study of politicization through coalition formation and discourse provides evidence that politicization could occasionally able to slow down or hamper marketization. Yet, the EU has consistently acted as a catalyser for the marketization of welfare and continues to do so. Today, in the aftermath of the Eurozone crisis, austerity and marketization are two sides of the same coin.https://www.europeanpapers.eu/en/e-journal/welfare-markets-and-the-democracy-of-european-integrationwelfareservicesmarketizationeuropean unionpoliticizationdemocracy
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Amandine Crespy
spellingShingle Amandine Crespy
Welfare Markets and the Democracy of European Integration
European Papers
welfare
services
marketization
european union
politicization
democracy
author_facet Amandine Crespy
author_sort Amandine Crespy
title Welfare Markets and the Democracy of European Integration
title_short Welfare Markets and the Democracy of European Integration
title_full Welfare Markets and the Democracy of European Integration
title_fullStr Welfare Markets and the Democracy of European Integration
title_full_unstemmed Welfare Markets and the Democracy of European Integration
title_sort welfare markets and the democracy of european integration
publisher European Papers (www.europeanpapers.eu)
series European Papers
issn 2499-8249
publishDate 2017-01-01
description (Series Information) European Papers - A Journal on Law and Integration, 2016 1(3), 783-790 | Overview | (Abstract) Since 2009, austerity and the pressure for decreasing public spending in Europe have strongly targeted welfare services such as transport, healthcare, social services, culture and education, etc. In order to understand the current situation of welfare services in Europe today, one must take a step back and look at the broader development what has been the role of the EU in the marketization of public services? And to what extent has contestation mattered in that regard? From an institutionalist point of view, the EU has exhibited a bias towards negative integration, that is policies relying on competition and marketization. This is explained by the building the Single Market through liberalization directives and the institutional strength of competition law. Yet, legal and institutional factors (including case law) do not have a deterministic, mechanic effect on policy making. One needs to look at the political battles surrounding welfare services, and especially mobilization of left wing political actors (including radical left or social democratic parties, trade unions, and associations from the global justice movement) against marketization policies. Main contentious episodes have included protest against the EU Services directive, the campaign calling for an EU Framework directive on welfare services, and the global mobilization against the General Agreement on Trade in Services. The study of politicization through coalition formation and discourse provides evidence that politicization could occasionally able to slow down or hamper marketization. Yet, the EU has consistently acted as a catalyser for the marketization of welfare and continues to do so. Today, in the aftermath of the Eurozone crisis, austerity and marketization are two sides of the same coin.
topic welfare
services
marketization
european union
politicization
democracy
url https://www.europeanpapers.eu/en/e-journal/welfare-markets-and-the-democracy-of-european-integration
work_keys_str_mv AT amandinecrespy welfaremarketsandthedemocracyofeuropeanintegration
_version_ 1724350261870198784