Mining protein function from text using term-based support vector machines

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Text mining has spurred huge interest in the domain of biology. The goal of the BioCreAtIvE exercise was to evaluate the performance of current text mining systems. We participated in Task 2, which addressed assigning Gene Ontology t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rice Simon B, Nenadic Goran, Stapley Benjamin J
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2005-05-01
Series:BMC Bioinformatics
id doaj-c61ddb506bb5414da0b84e8848ca1a55
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c61ddb506bb5414da0b84e8848ca1a552020-11-24T22:15:14ZengBMCBMC Bioinformatics1471-21052005-05-016Suppl 1S2210.1186/1471-2105-6-S1-S22Mining protein function from text using term-based support vector machinesRice Simon BNenadic GoranStapley Benjamin J<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Text mining has spurred huge interest in the domain of biology. The goal of the BioCreAtIvE exercise was to evaluate the performance of current text mining systems. We participated in Task 2, which addressed assigning Gene Ontology terms to human proteins and selecting relevant evidence from full-text documents. We approached it as a modified form of the document classification task. We used a supervised machine-learning approach (based on support vector machines) to assign protein function and select passages that support the assignments. As classification features, we used a protein's co-occurring terms that were automatically extracted from documents.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The results evaluated by curators were modest, and quite variable for different problems: in many cases we have relatively good assignment of GO terms to proteins, but the selected supporting text was typically non-relevant (precision spanning from 3% to 50%). The method appears to work best when a substantial set of relevant documents is obtained, while it works poorly on single documents and/or short passages. The initial results suggest that our approach can also mine annotations from text even when an explicit statement relating a protein to a GO term is absent.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>A machine learning approach to mining protein function predictions from text can yield good performance only if sufficient training data is available, and significant amount of supporting data is used for prediction. The most promising results are for combined document retrieval and GO term assignment, which calls for the integration of methods developed in BioCreAtIvE Task 1 and Task 2.</p>
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rice Simon B
Nenadic Goran
Stapley Benjamin J
spellingShingle Rice Simon B
Nenadic Goran
Stapley Benjamin J
Mining protein function from text using term-based support vector machines
BMC Bioinformatics
author_facet Rice Simon B
Nenadic Goran
Stapley Benjamin J
author_sort Rice Simon B
title Mining protein function from text using term-based support vector machines
title_short Mining protein function from text using term-based support vector machines
title_full Mining protein function from text using term-based support vector machines
title_fullStr Mining protein function from text using term-based support vector machines
title_full_unstemmed Mining protein function from text using term-based support vector machines
title_sort mining protein function from text using term-based support vector machines
publisher BMC
series BMC Bioinformatics
issn 1471-2105
publishDate 2005-05-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Text mining has spurred huge interest in the domain of biology. The goal of the BioCreAtIvE exercise was to evaluate the performance of current text mining systems. We participated in Task 2, which addressed assigning Gene Ontology terms to human proteins and selecting relevant evidence from full-text documents. We approached it as a modified form of the document classification task. We used a supervised machine-learning approach (based on support vector machines) to assign protein function and select passages that support the assignments. As classification features, we used a protein's co-occurring terms that were automatically extracted from documents.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The results evaluated by curators were modest, and quite variable for different problems: in many cases we have relatively good assignment of GO terms to proteins, but the selected supporting text was typically non-relevant (precision spanning from 3% to 50%). The method appears to work best when a substantial set of relevant documents is obtained, while it works poorly on single documents and/or short passages. The initial results suggest that our approach can also mine annotations from text even when an explicit statement relating a protein to a GO term is absent.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>A machine learning approach to mining protein function predictions from text can yield good performance only if sufficient training data is available, and significant amount of supporting data is used for prediction. The most promising results are for combined document retrieval and GO term assignment, which calls for the integration of methods developed in BioCreAtIvE Task 1 and Task 2.</p>
work_keys_str_mv AT ricesimonb miningproteinfunctionfromtextusingtermbasedsupportvectormachines
AT nenadicgoran miningproteinfunctionfromtextusingtermbasedsupportvectormachines
AT stapleybenjaminj miningproteinfunctionfromtextusingtermbasedsupportvectormachines
_version_ 1725795376267526144