Screening for QT Prolongation in the Emergency Department: Is There a Better “Rule of Thumb?”
Introduction: Identification of QT prolongation in the emergency department (ED) is critical for appropriate monitoring, disposition, and treatment of patients at risk for torsades de pointes (TdP). Unfortunately, identifying prolonged QT is not straightforward. Computer algorithms are unreliable in...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
eScholarship Publishing, University of California
2020-01-01
|
Series: | Western Journal of Emergency Medicine |
Online Access: | https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9kf4j4wv |
id |
doaj-c62453dab813488897a1d9e06af54861 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-c62453dab813488897a1d9e06af548612020-11-25T02:08:27ZengeScholarship Publishing, University of CaliforniaWestern Journal of Emergency Medicine1936-90182020-01-0121210.5811/westjem.2019.10.40381wjem-21-226Screening for QT Prolongation in the Emergency Department: Is There a Better “Rule of Thumb?”Megan L. Rischall0Stephen W. Smith1Ari B. Friedman2Hennepin County Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Minneapolis, MinnesotaHennepin County Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Minneapolis, MinnesotaUniversity of Pennsylvania, Department of Emergency Medicine, Philadelphia, PennsylvaniaIntroduction: Identification of QT prolongation in the emergency department (ED) is critical for appropriate monitoring, disposition, and treatment of patients at risk for torsades de pointes (TdP). Unfortunately, identifying prolonged QT is not straightforward. Computer algorithms are unreliable in identifying prolonged QT. Manual QT-interval assessment methods, including QT correction formulas and the QT nomogram, are time-consuming and are not ideal screening tools in the ED. Many emergency clinicians rely on the “rule of thumb” or “Half the RR” rule (Half-RR) as an initial screening method, but prior studies have shown that the Half-RR rule performs poorly as compared to other QT assessment methods. We sought to characterize the problems associated with the Half-RR rule and find a modified screening tool to more safely assess the QT interval of ED patients for prolonged QT. Methods: We created graphs comparing the prediction of the Half-RR rule to other common QT assessment methods for a spectrum of QT and heart rate pairs. We then proposed various modifications to the Half-RR rule and assessed these modifications to find an improved “rule of thumb.” Results: When compared to other methods of QT correction, the Half-RR rule appears to be more conservative at normal and elevated heart rates, making it a safe initial screening tool. However, in bradycardia, the Half-RR rule is not sufficiently sensitive in identifying prolonged QT. Adding a fixed QT cutoff of 485 milliseconds (ms) increases the sensitivity of the rule in bradycardia, creating a safer initial screening tool. Conclusion: For a rapid and more sensitive screening evaluation of the QT interval on electrocardiograms in the ED, we propose combining use of the Half-RR rule at normal and elevated heart rates with a fixed uncorrected QT cutoff of 485 ms in bradycardia.https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9kf4j4wv |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Megan L. Rischall Stephen W. Smith Ari B. Friedman |
spellingShingle |
Megan L. Rischall Stephen W. Smith Ari B. Friedman Screening for QT Prolongation in the Emergency Department: Is There a Better “Rule of Thumb?” Western Journal of Emergency Medicine |
author_facet |
Megan L. Rischall Stephen W. Smith Ari B. Friedman |
author_sort |
Megan L. Rischall |
title |
Screening for QT Prolongation in the Emergency Department: Is There a Better “Rule of Thumb?” |
title_short |
Screening for QT Prolongation in the Emergency Department: Is There a Better “Rule of Thumb?” |
title_full |
Screening for QT Prolongation in the Emergency Department: Is There a Better “Rule of Thumb?” |
title_fullStr |
Screening for QT Prolongation in the Emergency Department: Is There a Better “Rule of Thumb?” |
title_full_unstemmed |
Screening for QT Prolongation in the Emergency Department: Is There a Better “Rule of Thumb?” |
title_sort |
screening for qt prolongation in the emergency department: is there a better “rule of thumb?” |
publisher |
eScholarship Publishing, University of California |
series |
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine |
issn |
1936-9018 |
publishDate |
2020-01-01 |
description |
Introduction: Identification of QT prolongation in the emergency department (ED) is critical for appropriate monitoring, disposition, and treatment of patients at risk for torsades de pointes (TdP). Unfortunately, identifying prolonged QT is not straightforward. Computer algorithms are unreliable in identifying prolonged QT. Manual QT-interval assessment methods, including QT correction formulas and the QT nomogram, are time-consuming and are not ideal screening tools in the ED. Many emergency clinicians rely on the “rule of thumb” or “Half the RR” rule (Half-RR) as an initial screening method, but prior studies have shown that the Half-RR rule performs poorly as compared to other QT assessment methods. We sought to characterize the problems associated with the Half-RR rule and find a modified screening tool to more safely assess the QT interval of ED patients for prolonged QT. Methods: We created graphs comparing the prediction of the Half-RR rule to other common QT assessment methods for a spectrum of QT and heart rate pairs. We then proposed various modifications to the Half-RR rule and assessed these modifications to find an improved “rule of thumb.” Results: When compared to other methods of QT correction, the Half-RR rule appears to be more conservative at normal and elevated heart rates, making it a safe initial screening tool. However, in bradycardia, the Half-RR rule is not sufficiently sensitive in identifying prolonged QT. Adding a fixed QT cutoff of 485 milliseconds (ms) increases the sensitivity of the rule in bradycardia, creating a safer initial screening tool. Conclusion: For a rapid and more sensitive screening evaluation of the QT interval on electrocardiograms in the ED, we propose combining use of the Half-RR rule at normal and elevated heart rates with a fixed uncorrected QT cutoff of 485 ms in bradycardia. |
url |
https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9kf4j4wv |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT meganlrischall screeningforqtprolongationintheemergencydepartmentisthereabetterruleofthumb AT stephenwsmith screeningforqtprolongationintheemergencydepartmentisthereabetterruleofthumb AT aribfriedman screeningforqtprolongationintheemergencydepartmentisthereabetterruleofthumb |
_version_ |
1724927356401876992 |