How stands the Tree of Life a century and a half after <it>The Origin</it>?
<p>Abstract</p> <p>We examine the Tree of Life (TOL) as an evolutionary hypothesis and a heuristic. The original TOL hypothesis has failed but a new "statistical TOL hypothesis" is promising. The TOL heuristic usefully organizes data without positing fundamental evolution...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2011-06-01
|
Series: | Biology Direct |
Online Access: | http://www.biology-direct.com/content/6/1/32 |
id |
doaj-c633424ea84a41f0b2bacf86b2f2e5f2 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-c633424ea84a41f0b2bacf86b2f2e5f22020-11-25T02:00:58ZengBMCBiology Direct1745-61502011-06-01613210.1186/1745-6150-6-32How stands the Tree of Life a century and a half after <it>The Origin</it>?Koonin Eugene VO'Malley Maureen A<p>Abstract</p> <p>We examine the Tree of Life (TOL) as an evolutionary hypothesis and a heuristic. The original TOL hypothesis has failed but a new "statistical TOL hypothesis" is promising. The TOL heuristic usefully organizes data without positing fundamental evolutionary truth.</p> <p>Reviewers</p> <p>This article was reviewed by W. Ford Doolittle, Nicholas Galtier and Christophe Malaterre.</p> http://www.biology-direct.com/content/6/1/32 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Koonin Eugene V O'Malley Maureen A |
spellingShingle |
Koonin Eugene V O'Malley Maureen A How stands the Tree of Life a century and a half after <it>The Origin</it>? Biology Direct |
author_facet |
Koonin Eugene V O'Malley Maureen A |
author_sort |
Koonin Eugene V |
title |
How stands the Tree of Life a century and a half after <it>The Origin</it>? |
title_short |
How stands the Tree of Life a century and a half after <it>The Origin</it>? |
title_full |
How stands the Tree of Life a century and a half after <it>The Origin</it>? |
title_fullStr |
How stands the Tree of Life a century and a half after <it>The Origin</it>? |
title_full_unstemmed |
How stands the Tree of Life a century and a half after <it>The Origin</it>? |
title_sort |
how stands the tree of life a century and a half after <it>the origin</it>? |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
Biology Direct |
issn |
1745-6150 |
publishDate |
2011-06-01 |
description |
<p>Abstract</p> <p>We examine the Tree of Life (TOL) as an evolutionary hypothesis and a heuristic. The original TOL hypothesis has failed but a new "statistical TOL hypothesis" is promising. The TOL heuristic usefully organizes data without positing fundamental evolutionary truth.</p> <p>Reviewers</p> <p>This article was reviewed by W. Ford Doolittle, Nicholas Galtier and Christophe Malaterre.</p> |
url |
http://www.biology-direct.com/content/6/1/32 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT koonineugenev howstandsthetreeoflifeacenturyandahalfafterittheoriginit AT omalleymaureena howstandsthetreeoflifeacenturyandahalfafterittheoriginit |
_version_ |
1724959700844281856 |