Going Digital: Persistent Identifiers for Research Samples, Resources and Instruments

The uptake of Persistent Identifiers (PIDs) has increased in recent years and has improved the Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability and Reusability (FAIR) of various research related objects (e.g., data, software, researchers and research organisations). The uptake of PIDs for physical aspec...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Esther Plomp
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ubiquity Press 2020-12-01
Series:Data Science Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://datascience.codata.org/articles/1285
id doaj-c63abd4d9fe3498dbc8c8dc9afff3bde
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c63abd4d9fe3498dbc8c8dc9afff3bde2021-01-11T05:08:59ZengUbiquity PressData Science Journal1683-14702020-12-0119110.5334/dsj-2020-046801Going Digital: Persistent Identifiers for Research Samples, Resources and InstrumentsEsther Plomp0Delft University of Technology, Faculty of Applied SciencesThe uptake of Persistent Identifiers (PIDs) has increased in recent years and has improved the Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability and Reusability (FAIR) of various research related objects (e.g., data, software, researchers and research organisations). The uptake of PIDs for physical aspects of research (such as samples, artefacts, reagents and analyses instruments) has thus far been embraced primarily for use in the fields of Earth and life Sciences. Wider adoption of PIDs for physical aspects of research can improve the findability and accessibility of these resources, which will allow for data to be put into more detailed context. By using PIDs all the information about a sample or artefact could be more easily available in a single location, allowing for persistent links to other sources of relevant information. Through the use of interoperable (metadata) standards and shared forms of documentation it will be easier to collaborate across multiple disciplines and the reusability of resulting data and the physical samples and artefacts themselves will improve. Wider adoption of PIDs for physical aspects of research is challenging, as research communities will have to work together to establish relevant standards that are meaningful across multiple domains. The infrastructure for wider adoption already exists, it is now up to research communities to adopt standards and PIDs for the physical aspects of their research and up to funding and research institutes to support this broader adoption.https://datascience.codata.org/articles/1285fairphysical samplespersistent identifiersdatapids
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Esther Plomp
spellingShingle Esther Plomp
Going Digital: Persistent Identifiers for Research Samples, Resources and Instruments
Data Science Journal
fair
physical samples
persistent identifiers
data
pids
author_facet Esther Plomp
author_sort Esther Plomp
title Going Digital: Persistent Identifiers for Research Samples, Resources and Instruments
title_short Going Digital: Persistent Identifiers for Research Samples, Resources and Instruments
title_full Going Digital: Persistent Identifiers for Research Samples, Resources and Instruments
title_fullStr Going Digital: Persistent Identifiers for Research Samples, Resources and Instruments
title_full_unstemmed Going Digital: Persistent Identifiers for Research Samples, Resources and Instruments
title_sort going digital: persistent identifiers for research samples, resources and instruments
publisher Ubiquity Press
series Data Science Journal
issn 1683-1470
publishDate 2020-12-01
description The uptake of Persistent Identifiers (PIDs) has increased in recent years and has improved the Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability and Reusability (FAIR) of various research related objects (e.g., data, software, researchers and research organisations). The uptake of PIDs for physical aspects of research (such as samples, artefacts, reagents and analyses instruments) has thus far been embraced primarily for use in the fields of Earth and life Sciences. Wider adoption of PIDs for physical aspects of research can improve the findability and accessibility of these resources, which will allow for data to be put into more detailed context. By using PIDs all the information about a sample or artefact could be more easily available in a single location, allowing for persistent links to other sources of relevant information. Through the use of interoperable (metadata) standards and shared forms of documentation it will be easier to collaborate across multiple disciplines and the reusability of resulting data and the physical samples and artefacts themselves will improve. Wider adoption of PIDs for physical aspects of research is challenging, as research communities will have to work together to establish relevant standards that are meaningful across multiple domains. The infrastructure for wider adoption already exists, it is now up to research communities to adopt standards and PIDs for the physical aspects of their research and up to funding and research institutes to support this broader adoption.
topic fair
physical samples
persistent identifiers
data
pids
url https://datascience.codata.org/articles/1285
work_keys_str_mv AT estherplomp goingdigitalpersistentidentifiersforresearchsamplesresourcesandinstruments
_version_ 1724341584041869312