Analytical assessment and comparison of facilities management services for residential estates

Populous places are particularly in need of high-rise residential buildings, which are increasingly built as estates. The facilities in these estates entail proper management in order to serve the numerous residents there. Aimed at evaluating the facilities management (FM) services for three major...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Joseph H. K. Lai
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Vilnius Gediminas Technical University 2012-10-01
Series:International Journal of Strategic Property Management
Subjects:
Online Access:https://tede.vgtu.lt/index.php/IJSPM/article/view/4856
id doaj-c63bd2453ab942fc99ad4570d350293f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c63bd2453ab942fc99ad4570d350293f2021-07-02T05:57:16ZengVilnius Gediminas Technical UniversityInternational Journal of Strategic Property Management1648-715X1648-91792012-10-0116310.3846/1648715X.2012.682183Analytical assessment and comparison of facilities management services for residential estatesJoseph H. K. Lai0Department of Building Services Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China Populous places are particularly in need of high-rise residential buildings, which are increasingly built as estates. The facilities in these estates entail proper management in order to serve the numerous residents there. Aimed at evaluating the facilities management (FM) services for three major kinds of residential estates (‘public’, ‘semi-public’ and ‘private’), a study was conducted based on a performance-importance-cost (PIC) evaluation model. The end-users’ perceived importance and performance levels and the cost data of the FM services for a public estate, a semi-public estate and a private estate were analyzed using the analytical hierarchy process (AHP), analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Fisher's least significant difference (LSD) procedure. The importance and performance levels of the services and their differences between the estates were revealed. The highest service performance and cost levels were found with the private estate, followed by the semi-public estate and the public estate, while the orders of their cost-effectiveness reversed. Rather than assessing merely the cost or performance of services, using the approach of this study to examine their cost-effectiveness can enable more holistic evaluations towards strategic property management. https://tede.vgtu.lt/index.php/IJSPM/article/view/4856Cost-effectivenessFacilities managementHousing estatePerformance evaluationResidential building
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Joseph H. K. Lai
spellingShingle Joseph H. K. Lai
Analytical assessment and comparison of facilities management services for residential estates
International Journal of Strategic Property Management
Cost-effectiveness
Facilities management
Housing estate
Performance evaluation
Residential building
author_facet Joseph H. K. Lai
author_sort Joseph H. K. Lai
title Analytical assessment and comparison of facilities management services for residential estates
title_short Analytical assessment and comparison of facilities management services for residential estates
title_full Analytical assessment and comparison of facilities management services for residential estates
title_fullStr Analytical assessment and comparison of facilities management services for residential estates
title_full_unstemmed Analytical assessment and comparison of facilities management services for residential estates
title_sort analytical assessment and comparison of facilities management services for residential estates
publisher Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
series International Journal of Strategic Property Management
issn 1648-715X
1648-9179
publishDate 2012-10-01
description Populous places are particularly in need of high-rise residential buildings, which are increasingly built as estates. The facilities in these estates entail proper management in order to serve the numerous residents there. Aimed at evaluating the facilities management (FM) services for three major kinds of residential estates (‘public’, ‘semi-public’ and ‘private’), a study was conducted based on a performance-importance-cost (PIC) evaluation model. The end-users’ perceived importance and performance levels and the cost data of the FM services for a public estate, a semi-public estate and a private estate were analyzed using the analytical hierarchy process (AHP), analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Fisher's least significant difference (LSD) procedure. The importance and performance levels of the services and their differences between the estates were revealed. The highest service performance and cost levels were found with the private estate, followed by the semi-public estate and the public estate, while the orders of their cost-effectiveness reversed. Rather than assessing merely the cost or performance of services, using the approach of this study to examine their cost-effectiveness can enable more holistic evaluations towards strategic property management.
topic Cost-effectiveness
Facilities management
Housing estate
Performance evaluation
Residential building
url https://tede.vgtu.lt/index.php/IJSPM/article/view/4856
work_keys_str_mv AT josephhklai analyticalassessmentandcomparisonoffacilitiesmanagementservicesforresidentialestates
_version_ 1721337977760645120