Ammonia and conventional engine fuels: comparative environmental impact assessment

Ammonia has recently attracted great attention as a fuel for internal combustion engines. The aim of this study was to compare the environmental impact caused by the production processes of ammonia and conventional engine fuels – gasoline and diesel oil. Present fuel technology, commonly used in Eur...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lasocki Jakub
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2018-01-01
Series:E3S Web of Conferences
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20184400091
id doaj-c65776276fa54e3f9424b72833b738ad
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c65776276fa54e3f9424b72833b738ad2021-02-02T05:45:44ZengEDP SciencesE3S Web of Conferences2267-12422018-01-01440009110.1051/e3sconf/20184400091e3sconf_eko-dok2018_00091Ammonia and conventional engine fuels: comparative environmental impact assessmentLasocki JakubAmmonia has recently attracted great attention as a fuel for internal combustion engines. The aim of this study was to compare the environmental impact caused by the production processes of ammonia and conventional engine fuels – gasoline and diesel oil. Present fuel technology, commonly used in Europe, was investigated. Haber-Bosch process for ammonia synthesis was considered, coupled with steam methane reforming (SMR) and partial oxidation of heavy oils (POX) as sources of hydrogen. Fuel technology was evaluated with the use of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), based on a total emission of selected pollutants, including greenhouse gases, total consumption of water and primary energy, as well as Eco-indicator 99 score. LCA results indicated that current industrial methods for ammonia production have unambiguously more negative impact on the environment, compared to fossil fuel technologies, when energy content of the fuel is taken into account. The environmental load of ammonia production process depends strictly on the method of hydrogen obtaining. SMR has lower negative impact on the environment than POX. In order for ammonia to be considered as a potential transportation fuel, the use of hydrogen generation pathways that are less burdensome to the environment should be promoted.https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20184400091
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lasocki Jakub
spellingShingle Lasocki Jakub
Ammonia and conventional engine fuels: comparative environmental impact assessment
E3S Web of Conferences
author_facet Lasocki Jakub
author_sort Lasocki Jakub
title Ammonia and conventional engine fuels: comparative environmental impact assessment
title_short Ammonia and conventional engine fuels: comparative environmental impact assessment
title_full Ammonia and conventional engine fuels: comparative environmental impact assessment
title_fullStr Ammonia and conventional engine fuels: comparative environmental impact assessment
title_full_unstemmed Ammonia and conventional engine fuels: comparative environmental impact assessment
title_sort ammonia and conventional engine fuels: comparative environmental impact assessment
publisher EDP Sciences
series E3S Web of Conferences
issn 2267-1242
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Ammonia has recently attracted great attention as a fuel for internal combustion engines. The aim of this study was to compare the environmental impact caused by the production processes of ammonia and conventional engine fuels – gasoline and diesel oil. Present fuel technology, commonly used in Europe, was investigated. Haber-Bosch process for ammonia synthesis was considered, coupled with steam methane reforming (SMR) and partial oxidation of heavy oils (POX) as sources of hydrogen. Fuel technology was evaluated with the use of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), based on a total emission of selected pollutants, including greenhouse gases, total consumption of water and primary energy, as well as Eco-indicator 99 score. LCA results indicated that current industrial methods for ammonia production have unambiguously more negative impact on the environment, compared to fossil fuel technologies, when energy content of the fuel is taken into account. The environmental load of ammonia production process depends strictly on the method of hydrogen obtaining. SMR has lower negative impact on the environment than POX. In order for ammonia to be considered as a potential transportation fuel, the use of hydrogen generation pathways that are less burdensome to the environment should be promoted.
url https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20184400091
work_keys_str_mv AT lasockijakub ammoniaandconventionalenginefuelscomparativeenvironmentalimpactassessment
_version_ 1724302866142724096